Ocular Oncology and Pathology
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy
FullText & PDF
Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Select
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more
Access via DeepDyve
Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article
Organize, annotate And mark up articles
Printing And downloading restrictions apply
Select
Subscribe
Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
Subcription rates
Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details
Abstract
Purpose: To identify non-overlapping diagnostic features between peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) and choroidal melanoma.
Methods: A retrospective study of 80 patients (80 eyes); 40 patients (40 eyes) with PEHCR and 40 patients (40 eyes) with choroidal melanoma was conducted. Ophthalmoscopic and imaging features of PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were compared. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying PEHCR and choroidal melanoma were calculated. Youden’s J statistic was assessed for each diagnostic feature.
Results: The most frequent clinical features of PEHCR were presence of druse (100%), hemorrhagic PED (93%), dome-shaped mass (B-scan) (90%), and subretinal/intraretinal hemorrhage (78%). Statistical analysis confirmed high sensitivity of hemorrhagic PED (0.93; 95% CI 0.80 – 0.98) and high specificity of clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation and bilaterality (1.00; 95% CI 0.91 – 1.00) as diagnostic features of PEHCR. Statistical analysis revealed presence of subretinal fluid 0.80 (95% CI 0.54 – 0.91) was most sensitive and presence of orange pigment, mushroom shape on B-scan, ciliary body extension, and choroidal excavation were most specific (1.00; 95% CI 0.91 – 1.00) for choroidal melanoma. Non-overlapping diagnostic features of PEHCR were hemorrhagic PED, clot retraction cleft, presence of lipid exudation, and bilaterality. All PEHCR patients (100%) had at least one of these non-overlapping diagnostic features. Non-overlapping diagnostic features of choroidal melanoma were the presence of orange pigment, choroidal excavation, mushroom-shaped mass, and ciliary body extension (the latter 3 detected on B-scan). Youden’s J statistic was highest for hemorrhagic PED and lowest for dome shape appearance on B-scan (0.075).
Conclusion: PEHCR and choroidal melanoma can be differentiated by identifying diagnostic features that are exclusive to each entity. The presence of hemorrhagic PED strongly supports a diagnosis of PEHCR. B-scan ultrasonography is required to detect a mushroom-shaped mass, choroidal excavation, or ciliary body extension to exclude underlying choroidal melanoma.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
Comments (0)