There is a scientific debate whether oxygen concentration may be a factor driving the pattern of size decrease at higher temperature. Central to this debate is the fact that oxygen availability relative to demand for living organisms decreases with increasing temperature. We examined whether rotifers Lecane inermis exposed to hypoxic conditions would evolve smaller sizes than rotifers exposed to normoxic conditions, using experimental evolution with the same fluctuating temperature but differentiated by three regimes of oxygen availability: normoxia, hypoxia throughout the whole thermal range, and hypoxia only at the highest temperature. Immediately after the six-month experiment (more than 90 generations), we tested the plasticity of size responses to temperature in three post-evolution groups, and we related these responses to fitness. The results show that normoxic rotifers had evolved significantly larger sizes than two hypoxic rotifer groups, which were similar in size. All three groups displayed similar plastic body size reductions in response to warming over the range of temperatures they were exposed to during the period of experimental evolution, but they showed different and complex responses at two temperatures below this range. Any type of plastic response to different temperatures resulted in a similar fitness pattern across post-evolution groups. We conclude that (i) these rotifers showed a genetic basis for the pattern of size decrease following evolution under both temperature-dependent and temperature-independent hypoxia; and (ii) plastic body size responds consistently to temperatures that are within the thermal range that the rotifers experienced during their evolutionary history, but responses become more noisy at novel temperatures, suggesting the importance of evolutionary responses to reliable environmental cues.