ERRATUM Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 172

Erratum: Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study

In the original article titled “Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Protocol versus Traditional Protocol in Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study”, published on pages 28-33, Issue 1, Volume 12 in Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care,[1] the footerwas inadvertently missed. The footer should read as below:

This article is based on a study first presented as an oral paper in AOA National Conference with the title “Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective caesarean section- A prospective observational study”[2] The study has been published in part as abstract in International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia, June 2021, Vol 46, Supplement 1, 103012 with the title 'Impact of implementation of ERAS protocol in elective caesarean section'.[3]

1.Gupta S, Gupta A, Baghel AS, Sharma K, Choudhary S, Choudhary V. Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2022;12:28-33  
    2.Baghel AS. Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective caesarean section- A prospective observational study. Presented at 14th National conference of Association of Obstetric Anaesthesia of India; 2021, Sep 23rd-25th; Hyderabad, India.  
    3.Choudhary S, Gupta S, Baghel AS, Sharma K. Impact of implementation of ERAS protocol in elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021;46:103012.