Blackmore AE, Wong MTC, Tang CL. “Evolution of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review,” (in eng). World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(17):4926–33. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4926.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Masubuchi S, Okuda J, Hamamoto H, Ishii M, Osumi W, Yamamoto M, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic left colectomy forleft-side colon cancer: a retrospective study. Clin Surg. 2019;4:2506.

Google Scholar 

Brown RF, Cleary RK. “Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive colectomy,” (in eng). J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(3):500–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2019.12.02.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cleary RK, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: a multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes,” (in eng). PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0206277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206277.

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Leersum NJ, et al. “The Dutch surgical colorectal audit,” (in eng). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(10):1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vlug MS, et al. “Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study),” (in eng). Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):868–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kennedy RH, et al. “Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL,” (in eng). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(17):1804–11. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.3694.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T, Stein S, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):264–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.006 (discussion 268).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jian-Cheng T, Shu-Sheng W, Bo Z, Jian F, Liang Z. “Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes,” (in eng). Medicine. 2016;95(48):e5538–e5538. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005538.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

R. F. Brown and R. K. Cleary, "Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive colectomy," Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Vol 11, No 3 (June 2020): Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/35090.

"Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis," J Laparoendosc Ad Surg Tech 2020, 30 4 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0693

Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(4):348–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0485.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Oostendorp S, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):64–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(9):1177–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Aiolfi A, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis,” (in eng). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(4):402–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0693. (The most recent systematic review conducted at the time of writing this paper. Unlike previous reviews, it reported no significant differences in key outcomes such as anastomotic leakage. Lymph node yield was not analysed.)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Emile SH, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis,” (in eng). Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(11):1023–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02079-7.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

"Wells G SB, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

Jadad AR, et al. “Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?,” (in eng). Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

T. C. C. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014., 2014.

P. RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.

DerSimonian R, Laird N. “Meta-analysis in clinical trials,” (in eng). Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Akram WM, et al. “A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway,” (in English). Am J Surg, Article. 2018;216(6):1095–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anania G, et al. “A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery,” (in English). World J Gastroenterol, Article. 2012;18(29):3869–74. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3869.

Article  Google Scholar 

N. Bou Saleh et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: results from the CLIMHET study group," (in English). Tech Coloproctol 2020 24 6 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02202-z.

Carlini M, Spoletini D, Castaldi F, Giovannini C, Passaro U. “Laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure tumors,” (in English). Updates Surg, Article. 2016;68(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0357-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

R. K. Cleary et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: a multi-center propensity scorematched comparison of outcomes," (in English), PLoS One 2018 13 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206277.

Fagarasan V, et al. “Which is the optimal method of reconstruction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, the intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis technique?,” (in English), Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). Article. 2020;115(4):493–504. https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.115.4.493.

Article  Google Scholar 

M. E. Franklin Jr et al., "Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: 11-year experience," (in English). Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004 69 Suppl 1 65–72. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L40414143&from=export.

Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B. “Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2010;24(8):1886–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grieco M, et al. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic resection of the splenic flexure colon cancer: a multicenter propensity score analysis,” (in English). Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Article. 2019;29(6):483–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000653.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hanna MH, et al. “Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2016;30(9):3933–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4704-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

M. Hellan, C. Anderson, and A. Pigazzi, "Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy," (in English). J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2009 Article vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 312–317. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L355484774&from=exporthttp://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/sls/10868089/v13n3/s6.pdf?expires=1255556505&id=52532148&titleid=75000538&accname=Elsevier+Science&checksum=C8AA576B818E1B929896AF4D710263AB.

T. Jian-Cheng, W. Shu-Sheng, Z. Bo, F. Jian, and Z. Liang, "Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes." Medicine 2016 95 48 e5538. [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med13&AN=27902621http://bb2sz3ek3z.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:med13&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMD.0000000000005538&rft_id=info:pmid/27902621&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=48&rft.spage=e5538&rft.pages=e5538&rft.date=2016&rft.jtitle=Medicine&rft.atitle=Total+laparoscopic+right+hemicolectomy+with+3-step+stapled+intracorporeal+isoperistaltic+ileocolic+anastomosis+for+colon+cancer%3A+An+evaluation+of+short-term+outcomes.&rft.aulast=Jian-Cheng.

Kayano H, et al. “Short- and long-term outcomes of 2-step stapled intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer,” (in English). Anticancer Res, Article. 2019;39(11):6393–401. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13853.

Article  Google Scholar 

S. R. Kelley, E. Duchalais, and D. W. Larson, "Short-term outcomes with robotic right colectomy," (in English). Am Surg 2018 84 11 1768–1773. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L625451368&from=export.

Krouchev R, Tamana S, Nguyen N, Yorke E, Harris D, Sampath S. “Total intracorporeal anastomosis for right hemicolectomy: experience from a Canadian center,” (in English). Am J Surg, Article. 2018;215(5):905–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.013.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kwiatkowski AP, Stępińska G, Stanowski E, Paśnik K, Janik MR. “Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy – single center experience,” (in English). Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne, Article. 2019;14(3):381–6. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.81725.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A. “Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2013;27(6):1986–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2698-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

H. J. Lujan et al., "Advantages of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis". Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, Comparative Study 2018 28 1 36–41. [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med15&AN=28319493http://bb2sz3ek3z.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:med15&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSLE.0000000000000384&rft_id=info:pmid/28319493&rft.issn=1530-4515&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-41&rft.date=2018&rft.jtitle=Surgical+Laparoscopy%2C+Endoscopy+%26+Percutaneous+Techniques&rft.atitle=Advantages+of+Robotic+Right+Colectomy+With+Intracorporeal+Anastomosis.&rft.aulast=Lujan.

Magistro C, et al. “Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2013;27(7):2613–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2799-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

V. Malerba et al., "Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis," (in English). Ann Ital Chir 2020 91 49–54. [Online]. Available: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L631268119&from=export.

Mari GM, et al. “Intracorporeal anastomosis reduces surgical stress response in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective randomized trial,” (in English). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2018;28(2):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506.

Article  Google Scholar 

Martinek L, You K, Giuratrabocchetta S, Gachabayov M, Lee K, Bergamaschi R. “Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study,” (in English). Int J Colorectal Dis, Article. 2018;33(3):291–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

M. Milone et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients." Surg Endosc 2018 Article In Press 1‐7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6065-8.

M. Milone et al., "Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers." Surg Endosc, Comparative Study Multicenter Study 2015 29 8 2314–20. [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med12&AN=25414066http://bb2sz3ek3z.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:med12&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00464-014-3950-7&rft_id=info:pmid/25414066&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2314&rft.pages=2314-20&rft.date=2015&rft.jtitle=Surgical+Endoscopy&rft.atitle=Intracorporeal+versus+extracorporeal+anastomosis.+Results+from+a+multicentre+comparative+study+on+512+right-sided+colorectal+cancers.&rft.aulast=Milone.

Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. “Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy,” (in English). Surg Endosc, Article. 2007;21(10):1701–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y.

CAS  Article