Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act

1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research . NDA 20-687. Approval Letter for MIFEPREX (mifepristone) Tablets, 200 mg to Population Council. Food and Drug Administration. Written September 28, 2000. Accessed November 18, 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2000/20687appltr.htm
Google Scholar2. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. FDA. Updated October 22, 2021. Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
Google Scholar3. What is FOIA? US Dept of Justice. FOIA. Accessed November 16, 2021. https://www.foia.gov/about.html
Google Scholar4. Cleland, K, Creinin, MD, Nucatola, D, Nshom, M, Trussell, J. Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):166‐171. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182755763
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Aultman, K, Cirucci, C, Harrison, D, et al. Deaths and severe adverse events after the Use of mifepristone as an abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019. Issues Law Med. 2021;36(1):326. https://issuesinlawandmedicine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Deaths-and-Severe-Adverse-Events-after-the-use-of-Mifepristone-as-an-Abortifacient-from-September-2000-to-February-2019-copy5.pdf.
Google Scholar6. Gary, MM, Harrison, DJ. Analysis of severe adverse events related to the Use of mifepristone as an abortifacient. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(2):191‐197. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1G481
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI7. Communities Need Clinics: The Essential Role of Independent Abortion Clinics in the United States . Abortion Care Network. 2020:2. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://abortioncarenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CommunitiesNeedClinics-2020.pdf.
Google Scholar8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States. The National Academies Press; 2018: Kindle Locations 1351–1367. Accessed 11–29–21. https://doi.org/10.17226/24950
Google Scholar9. Gill, R, Norman, WV. Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts. Mhealth. 2018;4(3):1–4. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2018.01.01
Google Scholar | Medline10. Upadhyay, UD, Schroeder, R, Roberts, SCM. Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19. Contracept X. 2020;2(100049):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049
Google Scholar11. Gatter, M, Cleland, K, Nucatola, DL. Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days. Contraception. 2015;91(4):269‐273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.005
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Food and Drug Administration . Information on Mifeprex Labeling Changes and Ongoing Monitoring Efforts. GAO-18-292 Report to Congressional Requesters. March 2018:8. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/690914.pdf
Google Scholar13. Letter from Woodcock J . (Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs) to Phipps MG (Chief Executive Officer ACOG) and Grobman, W (Pres Society for Fetal-Maternal Medicine). ACLU. April 12, 2021. p. 2. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/fda_acting_commissioner_letter_to_acog_april_12_2021.pdf
Google Scholar14. Letter to Joseph R. Biden (President of the US) from the ACLU and others . Planned Parenthood. March 18, 2021. 1-5. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/28/b2/28b21706-7f25-4cd6-b43b-ee340a6681d7/coalition_letter_to_biden_administration_re_mifepristone_3_18_21_final.pdf
Google Scholar15. Chelius v. Becerra, Case 1:17-cv-00493-JAO-RT . Document 148. P. 3191. (DC Hawaii) July 9, 2021. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/chelius_v._becerra_-_joint_motion_for_stay_pending_agency_review_may_7_2021.pdf
Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif