1. Insall, J, Ranawat, CS, Scott, WN, et al. Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 120;: 149–154.
Google Scholar2. Shoji, H, Wolf, A, Packard, S, et al. Cruciate retained and excised total knee arthroplasty. A comparative study in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (305): 218–222.
Google Scholar | Medline3. Bolanos, AA, Colizza, WA, McCann, PD, et al. A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13(8): 906–915.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Jacobs, WC, Clement, DJ, Wymenga, AB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4): CD004803.
Google Scholar | Medline5. Verra, WC, van den Boom, LG, Jacobs, W, et al. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11(10): CD004803.
Google Scholar6. Hogervorst, T, Brand, RA. Mechanoreceptors in joint function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80(9): 1365–1378.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Scott, RD . Total Knee Replacement. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders, 1943.
Google Scholar8. Hino, K, Ishimaru, M, Iseki, Y, et al. Mid-flexion laxity is greater after posterior-stabilised total knee replacement than with cruciate-retaining procedures. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(4): 493–497.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Dennis, DA, Komistek, RD, Stiehl, JB, et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13(7): 748–752.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Migaud, H, Tirveilliot, F, Preservation, resection or substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. Proceedings of the EFORT congress. European Instructional Course Lectures, 2003; 6: 176–184.
Google Scholar11. Mihalko, WM, Miller, C, Krackow, KA. Total knee arthroplasty ligament balancing and gap kinematics with posterior cruciate ligament retention and sacrifice. Am J Orthop 2000; 29(8): 610–616.
Google Scholar | Medline12. Laskin, RS, Rieger, M, Schob, C, et al. The posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis in the knee with a severe fixed deformity. Am J Knee Surg 1988; 1: 199.
Google Scholar13. Laskin, RS . Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in patients with a fixed varus deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 331: 29–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Laskin, RS . The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 388: 95–102.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Lombardi, AV, Berend, KR. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, posterior stabilized, and varus/valgus posterior stabilized constrained articulations in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2006; 55: 419–427.
Google Scholar | Medline16. Ritter, MA, Faris, GW, Faris, PM, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with angular varus or valgus deformities of ≥ 20°. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(7): 862–866.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Kubiak, P, Archibeck, MJ, White, RE. Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with at least fifteen degrees of coronal plane deformity. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(3): 366–370.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Faris, PM, Herbst, SA, Ritter, MA, et al. The effect of preoperative knee deformity on the initial results of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7(4): 527–530.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Yoshioka, Y, Siu, D, Cooke, DV. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69-A: 7873–7880.
Google Scholar20. Insall, JN, Dorr, LD, Scott, RD, et al. Rationale, of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248;: 13–14.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Lombardi, AV, Berend, KR, Ng, VY. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 2011; 34(9): e504–e506.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Burnett, RS, Haydon, CM, Rorabeck, CH, et al. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004; 428: 12–25.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI23. Gudnason, A, Hailer, NP, W-Dahl, A, et al. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components-an analysis of 27,733 cruciate-retaining total knee replacements from the Swedish knee arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(12): 994–999.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Harvie, P, Sloan, K, Beaver, RJ. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(5): 667–672.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Voigt, J, Mosier, M. Cemented all-polyethylene and metal-backed polyethylene tibial components used for primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving 1798 primary total knee implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(19): 1790–1798.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–483.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI27. Thumboo, J, Fong, K-Y, Machin, D, et al. Quality of life in an urban Asian population: the impact of ethnicity and socio-economic status. Social Sci Med 2003; 56(8): 1761–1772.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Dawson, J, Fitzpatrick, R, Murray, D, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80-B(1): 63–69.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Escobar, A, Quintana, JM, Bilbao, A, et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15(3): 273–280.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Nuttall, FQ . Body mass index: obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutr Today 2015; 50(3): 117–128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Srikanth, VK, Fryer, JL, Zhai, G, et al. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13(9): 769–781.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI32. Coggon, D, Reading, I, Croft, P, et al. Knee osteoarthritis and obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25(5): 622–627.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Ünkar, EA, Öztürkmen, Y, Şükür, E, et al. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2017; 51: 95–99.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Rodríguez-Merchán, EC . Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints: indications and results. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(4): 121–132.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Sabatini, L, Risitano, S, Rissolio, L, et al. Condylar constrained system in primary total knee replacement: our experience and literature review. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5(6): 135.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Teeny, SM, Krackow, KA, Hungerford, DS, et al. Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 273: 19–31.
Google Scholar37. Baldini, A, Scuderi, GR, Aglietti, P, et al. Flexion-extension gap changes during total knee arthroplasty: effect of posterior cruciate ligament and posterior osteophytes removal. J Knee Surg 2004; 17(2): 69–72.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Kadoya, Y, Kobayashi, A, Komatsu, T, et al. Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 391 2001; 391: 210–217.
Google Scholar | Crossref39. Biau, DJ, Kernéis, S, Porcher, R. Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(9): 2282–2288.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI40. American Joint Replacement Registry . First annual report on hip and knee arthroplasty data, 2013.
Google Scholar41. Sheehy, L, Felson, D, Zhang, Y, et al. Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19(1): 58–64.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline