Boyce, DE, Srivastava, S. Placement of sutures in tendon repair. Br J Plast Surg. 1999, 52: 511.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Boyer, MI, Meunier, MJ, Lescheid, J, Burns, ME, Gelberman, RH, Silva, MJ. The influence of cross-sectional area on the tensile properties of flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2001, 26: 828–32.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Byrne, M, Aly, A. The surgical needle. Aesthet Surg J. 2019, 39: S73–7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Choke, A, Wong, YR, McGrouther, DA, Razak, HRBA. The strengths of four different suture types in pulvertaft tendon reconstruction. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 417–9.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Frick TB, Marucci DD, Cartmill JA, Martin CJ, Walsh WR. Resistance forces acting on suture needles. J Biomech. 2001, 34: 1335–40.
Google Scholar | Crossref Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, Winters SC, Silva MJ. The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999, 81: 975–82.
Google Scholar | Crossref Giesen, T, Reissner, L, Besmens, I, Politikou, O, Calcagni, M. Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–9.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Lam, WL, Garrido, A, Vandermeulen, J, Fagan, MJ, Stanley, PR. Cutting or round-bodied needles for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 475–7.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Linnanmäki, L, Göransson, H, Havulinna, J, Sippola, P, Karjalainen, T, Leppänen, OV. Gap formation during cyclic testing of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2018, 43: 570.e1–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref Nduka, CC, Pereira, JA, Belcher, HJ. A simple technique to avoid inadvertent damage to monofilament core suture material during flexor-tendon repair. Br J Plast Surg. 2001, 54: 80–1.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Pan, ZJ, Pan, L, Xu, YF, Ma, T, Yao, LH. Outcomes of 200 digital flexor tendon repairs using updated protocols and 30 repairs using an old protocol: experience over 7 years. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020, 45: 56–63.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Pan, ZJ, Xu, YF, Pan, L, Chen, J. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 361–6.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Pring, DJ, Amis, AA, Coombs, RR. The mechanical properties of human flexor tendons in relation to artificial tendons. J Hand Surg Br. 1985, 10: 331–6.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Sahoo, S, Greeson, CB, McCarron, JA, et al.Effect of pretension and suture needle type on mechanical properties of acellular human dermis patches for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012, 21: 1413–21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Strickland, J 1999 Flexor tendons – acute injuries. In: Green, D, Hotchkiss, R, Pederson, W (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery, New York: Churchill Livingstone, pp. 1861–2.
Google Scholar Tang, JB, Zhou, X, Pan, ZJ, Qing, J, Gong, KT, Chen, J. Strong digital flexor tendon repair, extension-flexion test, and early active flexion: experience in 300 tendons. Hand Clin. 2017, 33: 455–63.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Wu, YF, Mao, WF, Tang, JB. The impact of transverse components on 4-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 830–5.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Wu, YF, Tang, JB. The impact of transverse components on resistance and ultimate strength of 6-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 836–41.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI