A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+)

Keywords: cervical cancer, cytology screening, human papillomavirus (HPV), high-grade lesions, low-grade lesions

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most preventable cancers; however, it is the leading cause of cancer-related female deaths in South Africa. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of recurrent low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology as criteria to predict CIN2+ incidence, to a single initial high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study comprising 344 women was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018 at the Colposcopy Clinic, Tygerberg Hospital. The women were categorised into two groups: (1) women with a recurrent LSIL cytology result, with recurrent cytology scheduled within 6–12 months; (2) women diagnosed with a single initial HSIL cytology result. The outcome was dichotomised into (1) normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (<CIN2) and (2) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 or CC (CIN2+). Pearson’s chi-square test (X2) and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess any association between the patient-related factors considered and CIN2+ incidence.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for referral HSIL cytology was 72.73% (95% CI 65.96–78.80), 79.10% (95% CI 71.24–85.64), 83.72% (95% CI 78.54–87.85) and 66.25% (95% CI 60.61–71.46), respectively. HIV status (p = 0.012) and ARV treatment (p = 0.015) were found to have statistically significant associations with CIN2+ incidence.

Conclusions: A single initial HSIL result is a more efficient predictor of CIN2+ incidence compared with a recurrent LSIL cytology result. The HIV-negative women were more accurately identified as CIN2+, compared with HIV-positive women. Women not on ARV treatment were more accurately identified as <CIN2+, compared with women on ARV treatment.

Author Biographies

R Suleman, Stellenbosch University

African Cancer Institute, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa

M H Botha, Stellenbosch University

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Section

Original Research

By submitting manuscripts to SAJGO, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the South African Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SASGO). Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAJGO for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.

Comments (0)

No login
gif