Study determinants of neonatal mortality among newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit Adama, Ethiopia: A case–control study
Ghulam Nabi
Department of Pediatrics, Bugshan Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ghulam Nabi
Pediatric Consultant and Neonatologist, Bugshan Hospital, Post Box 5860, Jeddah 21432
Saudi Arabia
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
CheckDOI: 10.4103/jcn.JCN_16_20
I read with interest the publication entitled “Study Determinants of Neonatal Mortality among Newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) Adama, Ethiopia.” It is a case–control study reported by Kolobo et al.[1] I have some comments and queries, which require clarification from the authors:
There is no mention about how many babies were abnormal and how many had surgical intervention to correct congenital abnormalityHow many came for follow-up. Neonatal mortality in your study was 33.33% (a total of 300 babies were recruited in this study, from these, 100 cases were recorded as neonatal death and 200 controls were alive, improved, and discharged)[1]In this study 48(48%) neonates were preterm, this was major factor for neonatal deaths.Prematurity and its complications followed by congenital malformations were the leading causes of death.[2] Recent studies reveal that the primary causes of mortality in perinatal and neonatal period are preterm births and malformation.[3]
Khan et al in their study reported of the 159 preterm enrolled children, 65% survived, 16% died, and 19% were lost to follow-up. Those who survived were followed up for neurodevelopment by physicians and developmental psychologists. At a mean age of 31 months, the developmental status of 85 children was followed up for 12 months. Of these, 32% were normal, 45% had mild neurodevelopment impairments, and 23% had serious neurodevelopment impairments.[4] Studies from the various regions of Saudi Arabia have shown variable neonatal mortality in NICU.
Arafa and Alsheri[5] from Abha (southern region of Saudi Arabia) have reported high neonatal mortality (22.4%). Bassuni et al.[6] from the same region reported a neonatal mortality of 17.4%. Nabi and Karim[7] from Khamis Mushait (same region) in a retrospective 7-year study of neonatal mortality reported rates of 17%, 27%, 24%, 12.5%, 11.5%, 9.9%, and 6.6% in the year 1984 up to 1990. From Medina Munawara, western region of Saudi Arabia, Nabi and Karim[6] reported 6% neonatal mortality. The reasons for low neonatal mortality in their study were:
Majority of the pregnant women attended the antenatal clinic and the deliveries were conducted in the hospitalsAdequate number of beds available for the admission in the NICUAdequate number of trained staff (including doctors and nurses), equipment including assisted ventilation, and drugs including surfactantStrict aseptic precautions in collaboration with the infectious control team of the hospitalEarly use of expressed breast milk, breastfeeding, and early maternal involvement for the care of the babyThree-tier medical care system in this country, including primary health centers, secondary care hospitals, and tertiary care hospitalsRapid transport facilities for the transport of sick patientsRegular perinatal mortality and morbidity meeting between obstetricians and NICU staff to discuss mortality and morbidity in the hospitalSupport from continuous medical education programRegular neonatology club meeting in the region. The problems faced by newborn infants vary significantly in different parts of the globe; even among developing nations, there is much variability in the causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. While planning and providing health-care services to newborn infants, we have primarily looked at the information originating in specialized neonatal units rather than at the grassroot level.[8]Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
Comments (0)