A heuristic model for cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal dysplasia

Adams, JW (1940) Correction of error in cephalometric roentgenograms. Angle Orthodontist 10: 3–13.
Google Scholar Ahmed, M, Shaikh, A, Fida, M (2016) Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 21: 41–49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Ahmed, M, Shaikh, A, Fida, M (2018) Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 23: 75–81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Angle, EH (1899) Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 41: 248–264.
Google Scholar Aparna, P, Kumar, DN, Prasad, M, Shamnur, N, Arun Kumar, G, Sridhar, KR, et al (2015) Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 9: 38–41.
Google Scholar Asad, S, Naeem, S (2009) Correlation between various vertical dysplasia assessment parameters. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal 1: 28–33.
Google Scholar Baik, CY, Ververidou, M (2004) A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The β angle. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 126: 100–105.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bhad, WA, Nayak, S, Doshi, UH (2013) A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle. European Journal of Orthodontics 35: 66–70.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bishara, S, Fahl, J, Peterson, L (1983) Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: Clinical applications. American Journal of Orthodontics 84: 133–139.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bohra, S, Udeshi, PS, Sinha, SP, Saidath, K, Shetty, KP, Nayak, USK (2018) Predictability of Pi angle and its comparison with ANB angle, W angle, Yen angle and Β angle in South Indian population. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 52: 22–28.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Broadbent, BH (1931) A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 1: 45–66.
Google Scholar Dave, H, Gill, V, Rai, D, Reddy, YNN (2015) The HBN angle. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 49: 79–84.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Doshi, JR, Trivedi, K, Shyagali, T (2012) Predictability of Yen angle & appraisal of various cephalometric parameters in the assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible in Angle’s class II malocclusion. People’s Journal of Scientific Research 5: 1–8.
Google Scholar Gul, M, Hassan, R, Mushtaq, M, Khurshid, Z (2018) Comparison of linear cephalometric measurements for assessing sagittal jaw relationship. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 4: 111–113.
Google Scholar Gul-e-Erum, Fida, M (2008) A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 18: 679–683.
Google Scholar | Medline Hatewar, S, Reddy, GH, Singh, JR, Jain, M, Munje, S, Khandelwal, P, et al (2015) A new dimension to cephalometry: DW plane. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 49: 206–212.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Jacobson, A (1975) The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. American Journal of Orthodontics 67:125–138.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kalra, A, Jain, A, Jasoria, G, Parihar, SS, Gupta, AK, Matta, A, et al (2018) Comparison of relationship between HBN angle and W angle with skeletal discrepancy parameters in Gwalior population – A cephalometric study. International Journal of Current Research 10: 67702–67706.
Google Scholar Kim, YH, Vietas, JJ (1978) Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: An adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 73: 619–633.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kirchner, J, Williams, S (1993) A comparison of five different methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship. British Journal of Orthodontics 20: 13–17.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Kumar, S, Valiathan, A, Gautam, P, Chakravarthy, K, Jayaswal, P (2012) An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Journal of Orthodontics 39: 262–269.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Nanda, R, Merrill, R (1994) Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 105: 328–344.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Neela, P, Masceranhas, R, Hussain, A (2009) A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: The YEN angle. World Journal of Orthodontics 10: 147–151.
Google Scholar | Medline Qamaruddin, I, Alam, MK, Shahid, F, Tanveer, S, Umer, M, Amin, E (2018) Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability. Saudi Dental Journal 30: 43–46.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Riedel, R (1952) The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthodontist 22: 142–145.
Google Scholar Rotberg, S, Fried, N, Kane, J, Shapiro, E (1980) Predicting the Wits appraisal from the ANB angle. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 636–642.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Roth, R (1982) The ‘Wits’ appraisal - its skeletal and dento-alveolar background. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 21–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Sachdeva, K, Singla, A, Mahajan, V, Seth, V, Nanda, M (2012) Comparison of different angular measurements to assess sagittal discrepany - A cephalometric study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences 4: 27–29.
Google Scholar Sanjeliwala, A, Mehta, F, Patel, R, Bhattacharya, A, Parekh, H, Trivedi, R (2019) An Assessment and Comparison of Pi Analysis with Other Sagittal Discrepancy Indicators. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 18: 76–82.
Google Scholar Sharma, R, Sharma, K, Mathur, A, Preethi, N, Agarwal, V, Singh, S, et al (2015) Comparison of W angle with different angular and linear measurements in assessment of sagittal skeletal relationship in class I and class II patients in Jaipur population - a cephalometric study. Oral Health and Dental Management 14: 155–160.
Google Scholar Sundareswaran, S, Kumar, V (2015) Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine 6: 125–130.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Wylie, W (1947) The assessment of anteroposterior dysplasia. Angle Orthodontist 17: 97–109.
Google Scholar

Comments (0)

No login
gif