1. Longbons, T . U.S. abortion trends: 2019 and preliminary 2020. Charlotte Lozier Institute. American Reports Series Issue 19, September 2021. Accessed September 10, 2021. https://lozierinstitute.org/us-abortion-trends-2019-and-preliminary-2020/
Google Scholar2. U.S. Government Accountability Office . Food and Drug Administration: Information on mifeprex labeling changes and ongoing monitoring efforts. GAO-18-292. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2021.
Google Scholar3. Niinimäki, M, Pouta, A, Bloigu, A, et al. Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):795-804. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b5ccf9
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Carlsson, I, Breding, K, Larsson, P-G. Complications related to induced abortion: a combined retrospective and longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Women's Health. 2018;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0645-6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Cleland, K, Creinin, MD, Nucatola, D, Nshom, M, Trussell, J. Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):166-171. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182755763
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Ireland, LD, Gatter, M, Chen, AY. Medical compared with surgical abortion for effective pregnancy termination in the first trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):22-28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000910
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Upadhyay, UD, Johns, NE, Barron, R, et al. Abortion-related emergency department visits in the United States: an analysis of a national emergency department sample. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1072-0
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Studnicki, J, Reardon, D, Harrison, D, Fisher, J, Skop, I. Improving the metrics and data reporting for maternal mortality: a challenge to public health surveillance and effective prevention. Online J Public Health Inform. 2019;11(2):e17. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v11i2.10012
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Schaible, B . Improving the accuracy of maternal mortality and pregnancy related death. Issues Law Med. 2014;29(2):231-242.
Google Scholar | Medline10. New, MJ . Hyde @ 40: analyzing the impact of the Hyde amendment. Charlotte Lozier Institute, On Point Series 12. 2016. Accessed September 9, 2021. https://s27589.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/OP_hyde_9.28.3.pdf
Google Scholar11. Aultman, K, Cirucci, CA, Harrison, DJ, Beran, BD, Lockwood, MD, Seiler, S. Deaths and severe adverse events after the use of mifepristone as an abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019. Issues Law Med. 2021;36(1):3-26.
Google Scholar | Medline12. Joint Mot. to Stay Case Pending Agency Review, Chelius v. Becerra, Civ. No. 1:17-00493 JAO-RT (D. Haw.).
Google Scholar13. Upadhyay, UD, Desai, S, Zlidar, V, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):175-183. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000603
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI14. Safe2Choose . Will medical staff be able to notice that I am having an abortion? Accessed September 9, 2021. https://safe2choose.org/faq/medical-abortion-faq/during-abortion-with-pills/will-medical-staff-be-able-to-notice-that-i-am-having-an-abortion
Google Scholar15. Plan, C . Abortion pills FAQ: Can I get in trouble for using abortion pills? Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.plancpills.org/guide-how-to-get-abortion-pills#faq
Google Scholar16. Hicks, J . The Potential of Claims Data to Support the Measurement of Health Care Quality. Dissertation, RAND; 2003.
Google Scholar17. Romano, PS . Using administrative data to identify associations between implanted medical devices and chronic diseases. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(4):197-199. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00041-7
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline