Effectiveness of Computer-Based Auditory Training for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Randomized Crossover Study

Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I., Hochstein, S. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1515), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0253
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Alhanbali, S., Dawes, P., Lloyd, S., Munro, K. J. (2018). Hearing handicap and speech recognition correlate with self-reported listening effort and fatigue. Ear and Hearing, 39(3), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000515
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Anderson, S., White-Schwoch, T., Choi, H. J., Kraus, N. (2013). Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00097
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B., Kathleen, Pichora-Fuller, M. (2009). The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00753.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Aronoff, J. M., Landsberger, D. M. (2013). The development of a modified spectral ripple test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), EL217–EL222. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4813802
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Ausmeel, H. (1988). TIPS (Text-Information-Processing-System): A user’s guide. Department of Education and Psychology, Linkoping University.
Google Scholar Baddeley, A., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90019-1
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Bench, J., Doyle, J. (1979). The BKB/A (Bamford Kowal Bench) Sentence Lists for Speech Audiometry-Australian version. Lincoln Institute.
Google Scholar Bernstein, L. E., Eberhardt, S. P., Auer, E. T. (2014). Audiovisual spoken word training can promote or impede auditory-only perceptual learning: Prelingually deafened adults with late-acquired cochlear implants versus normal hearing adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00934
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Besser, J., Koelewijn, T., Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Festen, J. M. (2013). How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise—A review. Trends in Amplification, 17(2), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713813495459
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Besser, J., Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Rönnberg, J., Festen, J. M. (2012). New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0008
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., Dillier, N., Dowell, R., Fraysse, B., Gallégo, S., Govaerts, P. J., Green, K., Huber, A. M., Kleine-Punte, A., Maat, B., Marx, M., Mawman, D., Mosnier, I., O'Connor, A. F., … Lazard, D. S. (2013). Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiology & neuro-otology, 18(1), 36--47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343189
Google Scholar Boisgontier, M. P., Cheval, B. (2016). The ANOVA to mixed model transition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 1004–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.034
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Boisvert, I., Reis, M., Au, A., Cowan, R., Dowell, R. C. (2020). Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review. PLoS One, 15(5), e0232421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232421
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Boothroyd, A. (2007). Adult aural rehabilitation: What is it and does it work? Trends in Amplification, 11(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713807301073
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Boothroyd, A. (2010). Adapting to changed hearing: The potential role of formal training. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(9), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.9.6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Borson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Chen, P., Ganguli, M. (2003). The Mini-Cog as a screen for dementia: Validation in a population-based sample. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(10), 1451–1454. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Boutron, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P. (2017). CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: A 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0046
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Burckhardt, C. S., Anderson, K. L. (2003). The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(60), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-60
Google Scholar | Medline Causey, G. D., Hood, L. J., Hermanson, C. L., Bowling, L. S. (1984). The Maryland CNC test: Normative studies. Audiology, 23(6), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.3109/0020609840908153
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . (2005). Decision Memo for Cochlear Implantation (CAG-00107N). https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=134
Google Scholar Cullington, H., Kitterick, P., Weal, M., Margol-Gromada, M. (2018). Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 8, e019640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019640
Google Scholar Cunningham, L. L., Tucci, D. L. (2017). Hearing loss in adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(25), 2465–2473. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1616601
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Dosher, B. A., Lu, Z.-L. (2007). The functional form of performance improvements in perceptual learning: Learning rates and transfer. Psychological Science, 18(6), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01934.x
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Dupuis, K., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Chasteen, A. L., Marchuk, V., Singh, G., Smith, S. L. (2015). Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(4), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.968084
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Egan, J. P. (1948). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 955–991. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-194809000-00002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Ferguson, M. A., Henshaw, H. (2015). Auditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing loss. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00556
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Ferguson, M. A., Henshaw, H., Clark, D. P., Moore, D. R. (2014). Benefits of phoneme discrimination training in a randomized controlled trial of 50-to 74-year-olds with mild hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 35(4), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000020
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Fu, Q.-J., Galvin, J., Wang, X., Nogaki, G. (2004). Effects of auditory training on adult cochlear implant patients: A preliminary report. Cochlear Implants International, 5(S1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1179/cim.2004.5.Supplement-1.84
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Füllgrabe, C. (2020). On the possible overestimation of cognitive decline: The impact of age-related hearing loss on cognitive-test performance. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00454
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Granberg, S., Möller, K., Skagerstrand, Å., Möller, C., Danermark, B. (2014). The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: Researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). International Journal of Audiology, 53(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.858279
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Heinrich, A., Henshaw, H., Ferguson, M. A. (2015). The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00782
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Henshaw, H., Ferguson, M. A. (2013). Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: A systematic review of the evidence. PLoS One, 8(5), e62836. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062836
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Hilly, O., Hwang, E., Smith, L., Shipp, D., Nedzelski, J., Chen, J., & Lin, V. (2016). Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: Stability of outcome over time. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 130(8), 706--711. doi:10.1017/S0022215116008197
Google Scholar Hughes, S. E., Hutchings, H. A., Rapport, F. L., McMahon, C. M., Boisvert, I. (2018). Social connectedness and perceived listening effort in adult cochlear implant users: A grounded theory to establish content validity for a new patient-reported outcome measure. Ear and Hearing, 39(5), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000553
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers . (1969). IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 17(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1969.1162058
Google Scholar | Crossref Jennings, M. B., Cheesman, M. F., Laplante-Lévesque, A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for situational communication management questionnaire (SESMQ). Ear and Hearing, 35(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000441081.64281.b9
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Killion, M. C., Niquette, P. A., Gudmundsen, G. I., Revit, L. J., Banerjee, S. (2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2395–2405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1784440
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kramer, S. E., Zekveld, A. A., Houtgast, T. (2009). Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: The value of using the text reception threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00747.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Krueger, B., Joseph, G., Rost, U., Strau-Schier, A., Lenarz, T., Buechner, A. (2008). Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: Speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otology & Neurotology, 29(4), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318171972f
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI McCroskey, J. C., Beatty, M. J., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G. (1985). The content validity of the PRCA-24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369595
Google Scholar | Crossref Miller, J. D., Watson, C. S., Kistler, D. J., Wightman, F. L., Preminger, J. E. (2007). Preliminary evaluation of the Speech Perception Assessment and Training System (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 2(1), 050004. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2988004
Google Scholar | Crossref Molloy, K., Moore, D. R., Sohoglu, E., Amitay, S. (2012). Less is more: Latent learning is maximized by shorter training sessions in auditory perceptual learning. PLoS One, 7(5), e36929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036929
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Noble, W., Jensen, N. S., Naylor, G., Bhullar, N., Akeroyd, M. A. (2013). A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12. International Journal of Audiology, 52(6), 409–412. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.781278
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Oba, S. I., Fu, Q.-J., Galvin, J. J., III. (2011). Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users’ speech understanding in noise. Ear and Hearing, 32(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820fc821
Google Scholar

Comments (0)

No login
gif