1. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1283–1293.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, Akl, EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction – GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 383–394.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 395–400.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Balshem, H, Helfand, M, Schunemann, HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 401–406.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 407–415.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Montori, V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1277–1282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294–1302.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1303–1310.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Sultan, S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1311–1316.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI10. Brunetti, M, Shemilt, I, Pregno, S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 140–150.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, Sultan, S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 151–157.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Santesso, N, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 158–172.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Guyatt, GH, Thorlund, K, Oxman, AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 173–183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI14. Andrews, J, Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 719–725.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Andrews, JC, Schunemann, HJ, Oxman, AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 726–735.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Steiner, T. Intrazerebrale Blutung In: Fortbildung der TU München München, 13.01.2021 2021, Neurologische Klinik der TU München.
Google Scholar17. Schünemann, HJ, Mustafa, RA, Brozek, J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 111: 69–82.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Ntaios, G, Bornstein, NM, Caso, V, et al. The European Stroke Organisation guidelines: a standard operating procedure. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 128–135.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI19. Lo, B, Field, MJ. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, 2009.
Google Scholar20. N.N. Icmje Declaration www.icmje.org (2019, 18 February 2020).
Google Scholar21. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924–926.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Steiner, T, Salman, RA, Ntaios, G. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 838–839.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI23. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Schunemann, HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the journal of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 380–382.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI25. Higgins, JP, Altman, DG, Gotzsche, PC, et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928–d5928.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Toni, D, Sacchetti, M, Argentino, C, et al. Does hyperglycemia play a role on the outcome of acute ischaemic stroke patients?. J Neurol 1992; 239: 382–386.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI27. Higgins, JP, Savović, J, Page, MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials. (accessed 13 November 2019).
Google Scholar28. Sterne, JA, Hernan, MA, Reeves, BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Schünemann, HBJ, Oxman, A editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Version 3.2 [updated March 2009]. The GRADE Working Group, 2009, http://www.cc-ims.net/gradepro. (accessed 27 May 2021).
Google Scholar30. Seife, C. Research misconduct identified by the US food and drug administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 567–577.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI