Engineering and clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning and data science advancements: radiology leading the way for future

1. Thrall, JH, Li, X, Li, Q, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in radiology: opportunities, challenges, pitfalls, and criteria for success. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15: 504–508.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Schmidhuber, J . Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 2015; 61: 85–117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Yue, W, Wang, Z, Chen, H, et al. Machine learning with applications in breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Designs 2018; 2: 13.
Google Scholar | Crossref4. Cho, J, Lee, K, Shin, E, et al. How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy? arXiv preprint arXiv 2015: 1511.06348.
Google Scholar5. Srivastava, N, Hinton, G, Krizhevsky, A, et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 2014; 15: 1929–1958.
Google Scholar | ISI6. Shang, W, Sohn, K, Almeida, D, et al. Understanding and improving convolutional neural networks via concatenated rectified linear units. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning, , pp. 2217–2225. New York: ICML.
Google Scholar7. Glorot, X, Bordes, A, Bengio, Y. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (JMLR workshop and conference proceedings), Fort Lauderdale, FL, , pp. 315–323. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v15/glorot11a/glorot11a.pdf
Google Scholar8. Krizhevsky, A, Sutskever, I, Hinton, GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2012; 25: 1097–1105.
Google Scholar9. Dodge, S, Karam, L. A study and comparison of human and deep learning recognition performance under visual distortions. In: Proceedings 2017 26th international conference on computer communication and networks (ICCCN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, , pp. 1–7. New York: IEEE.
Google Scholar10. Rajpurkar, P, Irvin, J, Zhu, K, et al. CheXNet: radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest x-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv 2017: 1711.05225.
Google Scholar11. He, K, Zhang, X, Ren, S, et al. Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, Santiago, Chile, , pp. 1026–1034. New York: IEEE.
Google Scholar12. Aerts, HJ . The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2: 1636–1642.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Ravì, D, Wong, C, Deligianni, F, et al. Deep learning for health informatics. IEEE J Biomed Health 2016; 21: 4–21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Kononenko, I . Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med 2001; 23: 89–109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Saba, L, Biswas, M, Kuppili, V, et al. The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur J Radiol 2019; 114: 14–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Goodfellow, I, Bengio, Y, Courville, A, et al. Deep learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.
Google Scholar17. Morid, MA, Borjali, A, Del Fiol, G. A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNet. Comput Biol Med 2020; 128: 104115.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Mazurowski, MA, Buda, M, Saha, A, et al. Deep learning in radiology: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI. J Magn Reson Im 2019; 49: 939–954.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Erickson, BJ, Korfiatis, P, Akkus, Z, et al. Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 2017; 37: 505–515.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Wang, S, Summers, RM. Machine learning and radiology. Med Image Anal 2012; 16: 933–951.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Choy, G, Khalilzadeh, O, Michalski, M, et al. Current applications and future impact of machine learning in radiology. Radiology 2018; 288: 318–328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Figueroa, RL, Zeng-Treitler, Q, Kandula, S, et al. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Med Inform Decis 2012; 12: 1–10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. 8 key clinical applications of machine learning in radiology . Radiology Business, 26 June 2018, http://www.radiologybusiness.com/topics/artificial-intelligence/8-key-clinical-applications-machine-learning-radiology (accessed 16 February 2021).
Google Scholar24. Kohli, M, Prevedello, LM, Filice, RW, et al. Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208: 754–760.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Reza Soroushmehr, SM, Davuluri, P, Molaei, S, et al. Spleen segmentation and assessment in CT images for traumatic abdominal injuries. J Med Syst 2015; 39: 87–81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Pustina, D, Coslett, HB, Turkeltaub, PE, et al. Automated segmentation of chronic stroke lesions using LINDA: lesion identification with neighborhood data analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37: 1405–1421.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Maier, O, Schröder, C, Forkert, ND, et al. Classifiers for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation: a comparison study. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0145118.
Google Scholar | Crossref28. Liu, S, Xie, Y, Reeves, AP. Automated 3D closed surface segmentation: application to vertebral body segmentation in CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016; 11: 789–801.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Do, S, Salvaggio, K, Gupta, S, et al. Automated quantification of pneumothorax in CT. Comput Math Methods Med 2012; 2012: 736320.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Herweh, C, Ringleb, PA, Rauch, G, et al. Performance of e-ASPECTS software in comparison to that of stroke physicians on assessing CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 438–445.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI31. Burns, JE, Yao, J, Muñoz, H, et al. Automated detection, localization, and classification of traumatic vertebral body fractures in the thoracic and lumbar spine at CT. Radiology 2016; 278: 64–73.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Goodfellow, I, Pouget-Abadie, J, Mirza, M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In: Ghahramani, Z, Welling, M, Cortes, C, et al. (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). San Diego, CA: NeurIPS, 2014, pp. 2672–2680.
Google Scholar33. Wang, Y, Qiu, Y, Thai, T, et al. A two-step convolutional neural network based computer-aided detection scheme for automatically segmenting adipose tissue volume depicting on CT images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2017; 144: 97–104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Akkus, Z, Galimzianova, A, Hoogi, A, et al. Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Digit Imaging 2017; 30: 449–459.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Esses, SJ, Lu, X, Zhao, T, et al. Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture. J Magn Reson Im 2018; 47: 723–728.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Hannun, A, Case, C, Casper, J, et al. Deep speech: scaling up end-to-end speech recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv 2014: 1412.5567.
Google Scholar37. Hannaford, N, Mandel, C, Crock, C, et al. Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20120336.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI38. Morgan, TA, Helibrun, ME, Kahn, CE Reporting initiative of the Radiological Society of North America: progress and new directions. Radiology 2014; 273: 642–645.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Wu, Y, Giger, ML, Doi, K, et al. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 1993; 187: 81–87.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI40. McBee, MP, Awan, OA, Colucci, AT, et al. Deep learning in radiology. Acad Radiol 2018; 25: 1472–1480.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Hussain, L, Ahmed, A, Saeed, S, et al. Prostate cancer detection using machine learning techniques by employing combination of features extracting strategies. Cancer Biomark 2018; 21: 393–413.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Jnawali, K, Arbabshirani, MR, Ulloa, AE, et al. Automatic classification of radiological report for intracranial hemorrhage. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 13th international conference on semantic computing (ICSC), Newport Beach, CA, , pp. 187–190. New York: IEEE.
Google Scholar43. Al-antari, MA, Al-masni, MA, Park, SU, et al. An automatic computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer in digital mammograms via deep belief network. J Med Biol Eng 2018; 38: 443–456.
Google Scholar | Crossref44. Dikaios, N, Johnston, EW, Sidhu, HS, et al. Deep learning to improve prostate cancer diagnosis. In: Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, vol. 3, Paris, , http://cds.ismrm.org/protected/17MPresentations/abstracts/0669html
Google Scholar45. Pavithra, R, Pattar, SY. Detection and classification of lung disease-pneumonia and lung cancer in chest radiology using artificial neural network. Int J Sci Res Publ 2015; 5: 128–132.
Google Scholar46. Morey, JM, Haney, NM, Kim, W. Applications of AI beyond image interpretation. In: Ranschaert, E, Morozov, S, Algra, P (eds) Artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 129–143.
Google Scholar | Crossref47. Ulyanov, D, Vedaldi, A, Lempitsky, V. Deep image prior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, , pp. 9446–9454. New York: IEEE.
Google Scholar48. Radford, A, Metz, L, Chintala, S. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv 2015: 1511.06434.
Google Scholar49. Gong, K, Catana, C, Qi, J, et al. PET image reconstruction using deep image prior. IEEE T Med Imaging 2018; 38: 1655–1665.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline50. Rivenson, Y, Zhang, Y, Günaydın, H, et al. Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networks. Light Sci Appl 2018; 7: 17141–17141.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline51. Larson, DB, Towbin, AJ, Pryor, RM, et al. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 2013; 267: 240–250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline52. Pons, E, Braun, LM, Hunink, MM, et al. Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 2016; 279: 329–343.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline53. Lakhani, P, Kim, W, Langlotz, CP. Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25: 30–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline54. Sippo, DA, Warden, GI, Andriole, KP, et al. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26: 989–994.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline55. Lacson, R, Prevedello, LM, Andriole, KP, et al. Factors associated with radiologists’ adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9: 468–473.

Comments (0)

No login
gif