1. Elhai, M, Meune, C, Boubaya, M, et al. Mapping and predicting mortality from systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(11): 1897–1905.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Herrick, AL, Pan, X, Peytrignet, S, et al. Treatment outcome in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: the European Scleroderma Observational Study (ESOS). Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(7): 1207–1218.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Van Laar, JM, Farge, D, Sont, JK, et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 2490–2498.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Burt, RK, Milanetti, F. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: history and current status. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2011; 23(6): 519–529.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Kowal-Bielecka, O, Fransen, J, Avouac, J, et al. Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(8): 1327–1339.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Fernández-Codina, A, Walker, KM, Pope, JE, et al. Treatment algorithms for systemic sclerosis according to experts. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018; 70(11): 1820–1828.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Denton, CP, Laird, B, Moros, L, et al. Challenges in physician-patient communication for optimal management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a discourse analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39(10): 2989–2998.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Spierings, J, van Rhijn-Brouwer, FCC, de Bresser, CJM, et al. Treatment decision-making in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a patient’s perspective. Rheumatology 2020; 159(8): 2052–2061.
Google Scholar | Crossref9. Perrenoud, B, Velonaki, VS, Bodenmann, P, et al. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13(10): 82–94.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Kunneman, M, Pieterse, AH, Stiggelbout, AM, et al. Which benefits and harms of preoperative radiotherapy should be addressed? A Delphi consensus study among rectal cancer patients and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 2015; 114(2): 212–217.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Spierings, J, van Laar, JM. Choosing a treatment: how can patients be guided through the labyrinth? Lancet Rheumatol 2020; 2: e130–e131.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Hasson, F, Keeney, S, McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32(4): 1008–1015.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Jünger, S, Payne, SA, Brine, J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 2017; 31(8): 684–706.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals14. Humphrey-Murto, S, Varpio, L, Wood, TJ, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med 2017; 92(10): 1491–1498.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Nasa, P, Jain, R, Juneja, D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol 2021; 11: 116–129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Landgren, E, Bremander, A, Lindqvist, E, et al. ‘Mastering a new life situation’ – patients’ preferences of treatment outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis – a longitudinal qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14: 1421–1433.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Cheema, TJ, Young, M, Rabold, E, et al. Patient and physician perspectives on systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med 2020; 14: 1179548420913281.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals18. Yılmaz, NG, Schouten, BC, Schinkel, S, et al. Information and participation preferences and needs of non-Western ethnic minority cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102(4): 631–650.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Borgmann, SO, Gontscharuk, V, Sommer, J, et al. Different information needs in subgroups of people with diabetes mellitus: a latent class analysis. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 1901.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Singh, JA, Fraenkel, L, Green, C, et al. Individualized decision aid for diverse women with lupus nephritis (IDEA-WON): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2019; 16(5): e1002800.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Singh, JA, Shah, N, Green, C. Individualized patient decision-aid for immunosuppressive drugs in women with lupus nephritis: study protocol of a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Zikmund-Fisher, BJ, Fagerlin, A, Ubel, PA. ‘Is 28% good or bad?’ Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions. Med Decis Making 2004; 24(2): 142–148.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals23. Lipkus, IM, Samsa, G, Rimer, BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001; 21(1): 37–44.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals24. Gigerenzer, G, Gaissmaier, W, Kurz-Milcke, E, et al. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2007; 8(2): 53–96.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals25. Oliffe, M, Thompson, E, Johnston, J, et al. Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study. BMJ Open 2019; 9(2): e024582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline