1. Zelnick, JR, Abramowitz, M. The perils of privatization: bringing the business model into human services. Soc Work 2020; 65: 213–224.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Kotz, DM. The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Abramovitz, M. Regulating the lives of women: social policy from colonial times to the present. London: Routledge, 2018, Preface, pp.ix–xxxvi.
Google Scholar4. Harvey, D. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Abramovitz, M, Zelnick, JR. Business as usual? A wake up call for the human service. Report, Human Services Council, USA, June 2018. https://s27588.pcdn.co/wpcontent/uploads/2018/10/report_human_services_workforce
Google Scholar6. Hasenfeld, Y, Garrow, E. Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Soc Serv Rev 2012; 86: 295–322.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI7. Harlow, E, Berg, J, Chandler, EE. Neoliberalism, managerialism and the reconfiguring of social work in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Organization 2013; 20: 534–550.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI8. Salamon, LM. The nonprofit sector at a crossroads: the case of America. Voluntas 1999; 10: 5–23.
Google Scholar | Crossref9. Baines, D, Charlesworth, S, Turner, D, et al. Lean social care and worker identity: the role of outcomes, supervision and mission. Crit Soc Policy 2014; 34: 433–453.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI10. Abramovitz, M, Zelnick, JR. The rise of managerialism in the U.S.: Whither worker control?. In: Baines, D, Cunningham, I (eds) Working in the context of austerity: challenges and struggles. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2021.
Google Scholar11. Benjamin, LM, Misra, K. Doing good work: implication for performance accountability for practice in the non-profit sector. Int J Rural Man 2006; 2: 147–162.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals12. Tatian, PA. Performance measurement to evaluation. Report, The Urban Institute, NY, USA, 2016. http://www.urban.org/research/publication/performance-measurement-evaluation-0\
Google Scholar13. Hood, C. A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 1991; 69: 3–19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI14. Mullaly, B. The new structural social work. Oxford, ON: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Google Scholar15. Baines, D. ‘ Whose needs are being served?’ Quantitative metrics and the reshaping of social services. Stud Polit Econ 2006; 77: 195–209.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. Carey, M. Everything must go? The privatization of state social work. Br J Soc Work 2008; 38: 918–935.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI17. Abramovitz, M, Zelnick, JR. Privatization in the human services: impact on front lines and the ground floor. In: Fineman, M, Andersson, U, Mattsson, T (eds) Privatization, vulnerability, and social responsibility. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, 2016, pp.182–200.
Google Scholar18. Mark, L, Levit, KR, Vandivort-Warren, R, et al.; SAMHSA Spending Estimates Team. Trends in spending for substance abuse treatment, 1986–2003. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: 1118–1128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2019 National survey on drug use and health: methodological summary and definitions. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ (2019, accessed 15 March 2021).
Google Scholar20. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Opioid overdose crisis , https://www.drugabuse.gov/drug-topics/opioids/opioid-overdose-crisis (accessed 15 March 2021).
Google Scholar21. Alexander, J. Adaptive strategies of nonprofit human services organizations in an era of devolution and new public management. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2000; 10: 287–303.
Google Scholar | Crossref22. Banks, S. Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: professional wisdom and ethics work. Euro J Soc Work 2013; 16: 587–604.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Connell, R, Fawcett, B, Meagher, G. Neoliberalism new public management and the human service professions: introduction to the special issue. J Sociol 2009; 45: 331–338.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI24. Drug Policy Alliance. A brief history of the drug war , https://drugpolicy.org/issues/brief-history-drug-war (accessed 18 March 2021).
Google Scholar25. Sacco, L. Drug enforcement in the United States: history, policy and trends. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014, Report no. 7-5700, R43749.
Google Scholar26. Rosenberger, LR. America’s drug war debacle. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co, 1996.
Google Scholar27. Alexander, M. The new Jim crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press, 2012.
Google Scholar28. Mark, TL, Levit, KR, Vandivort-Warren, R, et al. Changes in U.S. spending on mental health and substance abuse treatment, 1986–2005, and implications for policy. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2011; 30: 284–292.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Mark, TL, Levit, K, Yee, T, et al. Spending of mental and substance use disorders projected to grow more slowly than all health spending through 2020. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2014; 33: 1407–1415.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. SAMHSA report: states will bear more of substance abuse treatment cost burden. Alcohol Drug Abuse Wkly 2008; 20: 1–3.
Google Scholar31. Clemans-Cope, L, Epstein, M, Lynch, V, et al. Rapid growth in medicaid spending and prescriptions to treat opioid use disorder and opioid overdose from 2010 to 2017. Report, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
Google Scholar32. New York State Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services . Statewide comprehensive service plan 2012–2016, https://www.oasas.ny.gov (accessed March 2021).
Google Scholar33. New York State Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services . Statewide comprehensive service plan 2020–2024, https://www.oasas.ny.gov (accessed March 2021).
Google Scholar34. Nevo, I, Slonim-Nevo, V. The myth of evidence-based practice: towards informed practice. Br J Soc Work 2001; 41: 1176–1197.
Google Scholar | Crossref35. Webb, SA. Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. Br J Soc Work 2001; 31: 57–79.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI36. Scaglione, F. Get your scorecard here!. New York, NY: New York Nonprofit Press, 2010, vol. 9, p. 1.
Google Scholar37. Lewiskin, JE. On the front lines: managerialism in substance abuse agencies. New York, NY: CUNY Academics Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2776 (2018, accessed 11 August 2021).
Google Scholar38. Patton, MQ. Qualitative research evaluation and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2002.
Google Scholar39. N., King Template analysis. In: Cassell, C, Symon, G (eds) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: a practical guide. London: SAGE, 1999, pp.118–134.
Google Scholar40. Fabricant, M. The industrialization of social work practice. Soc Work 1985; 30: 389–395.
Google Scholar | Crossref41. McCracken, S, Marsh, J. Practitioner expertise in evidence-based practice decision making. Res Soc Work Pract 2008; 18: 301–310.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI42. Aronson, J, Smith, K. Identity work and critical social service management: balancing a tightrope? Br J Soc Work 2011; 41: 432–448.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI43. Lonne, R. Social workers and human service practitioners. In Sollard, M, Winefield, A, Winefield, H (eds) Occupational stress in the service professions. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003, pp.281–310.
Google Scholar | Crossref44. Newcomb, M. Supportive social work supervision as an act of care: a conceptual model. Br J Soc Work 2021; ▪: bcab074.
Google Scholar | Crossref45. Corrigan, PW, Nieweglowski, K. Stigma and the public health agenda for the opioid crisis in America. Int J Drug Policy 2018; 59: 44–49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. Stark, C. The neoliberal ideology and the challenges for social work ethics and practice. Soc Work Rev 2010; 9: 9–19.
Google Scholar