Periimplantitis and Concomitant Perigraftitis of an Implant Placed in a Site that Had Alveolar Ridge Preservation Three Decades Earlier: A Case Report with Human Histology

Introduction

While alveolar ridge preservation may minimize alveolar ridge shrinkage following tooth extraction, there is a paucity of data on the effects of alveolar ridge preservation on implant-related outcomes. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on periimplantitis of an implant placed at a site that had alveolar ridge preservation three decades earlier, and the subsequent dislodgement of a ∼1cm3 grafted bone specimen during degranulation 4 months after implant reversal.

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old male had #18 removed and the extraction socket grafted in the 1980s. In 2016, an implant was placed at #18 and restored with a screw-retained restoration. It developed mobility and was removed in 2017; the explantation site was not grafted. In 2018, another implant was placed at #18 and restored in 2019 with a screw-retained restoration. At the 1-year follow-up, the implant had developed periimplantitis. Consequently, it was reversed without flap elevation. Four months later, infection remained. A buccal mucoperiosteal flap was reflected. Implant threads remained visible in the grafted bone. During degranulation, a ∼1cm3 grafted bone specimen dislodged from the mandible. Microscopy of the specimen shows numerous synthetic graft particulates surrounded by vital bone, with a mixed acute and chronic inflammatory infiltrate on its periphery.

Conclusion(s)

Within the limitation of this case report, absence of bone resorption due to impaired/altered bone metabolism of the grafted bone likely allowed bacteria to reach and infect the grafted bone via the implant fixture during development and progression of periimplantitis.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif