Role of cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization as a prognostic marker: Pathogenesis & clinical course in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia


   Table of Contents       ORIGINAL ARTICLE Year : 2021  |  Volume : 153  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 475-483

Role of cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization as a prognostic marker: Pathogenesis & clinical course in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Dhanlaxmi Shetty1, Hemani Jain1, Yogita Rohil1, Navin Khattry2, Manju Sengar3, Bhausaheb Bagal3, Hasmukh Jain3, Anant Gokarn2, Sachin Punatar2, Venkata Naga Avinash Bonda3, PG Subramanian4
1 Department of Cancer Cytogenetics, Advanced Centre for Training, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4 Department of Hematopathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication2-Aug-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dhanlaxmi Shetty
Cancer Cytogenetics Laboratory, Room No. 6, CCE Building, Advanced Centre for Training, Research & Education in Cancer, Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai 410 210, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2257_18

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Background & objectives: B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) is one of the most common forms of adult leukaemia, with a highly variable clinical course. Specific chromosomal and genetic aberrations are used clinically to predict prognosis, independent from conventional clinical markers. Molecular cytogenetic methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detect aberrations in up to 80 per cent B-CLL patients. This study was conducted to score the frequencies of recurrent aberrations, i.e., del(13q14), trisomy 12, del(11q22), del(17p13), del(6q21) and IgH (immunoglobulin heavy chain) translocations and to understand their role in prognostication and risk stratification.
Methods: FISH studies were performed on bone marrow aspirate or peripheral blood of 280 patients using commercially available disease-specific probe set. The data were correlated with clinical and haematological parameters such as low haemoglobin, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy.
Results: Chromosomal aberrations were detected in 79 per cent of patients, with del(13q14) (57%) as the most common cytogenetic aberration, followed by trisomy 12 (27%), del(11q22) (22%), t(14q32) (19%), del(17p13) (18%) and del(6q21) (9%). Single or in coexistence with other aberration del(13q14) had a favourable outcome in comparison to del(11q22), t(14q32), del(17p13) and del(6q21) which were associated with advanced stages of the disease. Trisomy 12 had a variable clinical course.
Interpretation & conclusions: FISH was found to be a sensitive and efficient technique in detecting the prevalence of recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities. Each of these aberrations is an important independent predictor of disease progression and survival which aids in designing risk-adapted treatment strategies for better disease management.

Keywords: B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia - chromosomal aberration - fluorescence in situ hybridization - lactate dehydrogenase - prognosis - time-to-first treatment - treatment-free survival


How to cite this article:
Shetty D, Jain H, Rohil Y, Khattry N, Sengar M, Bagal B, Jain H, Gokarn A, Punatar S, Avinash Bonda VN, Subramanian P G. Role of cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization as a prognostic marker: Pathogenesis & clinical course in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Indian J Med Res 2021;153:475-83
How to cite this URL:
Shetty D, Jain H, Rohil Y, Khattry N, Sengar M, Bagal B, Jain H, Gokarn A, Punatar S, Avinash Bonda VN, Subramanian P G. Role of cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization as a prognostic marker: Pathogenesis & clinical course in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Indian J Med Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 2];153:475-83. Available from: 
https://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2021/153/4/475/322936
B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) is highly heterogeneous in terms of its clinical course and prognosis which impacts the clinical approaches, treatment strategies and survival times from diagnosis[1]. The most prevalent symptoms in B-CLL are lymphadenopathy, organomegaly, fever, fatigue, weight loss and night sweats, though 25 per cent of patients are asymptomatic[2]. Rai and Binet clinical staging systems are the most useful methods for predicting survival of B-CLL patients, but these cannot be used to predict the individual risk of disease progression and survival during the early stages of disease detection[3]. Thus, determination of new prognostic markers is essential for providing appropriate counselling and designing better treatment strategies. Specific chromosomal and genetic aberrations are currently used clinically to predict prognosis independent of conventional clinical markers for a risk-adapted management of B-CLL patients. Conventional karyotyping can detect chromosome abnormalities in up to 40-50 per cent of patients with B-CLL[4]. Due to low mitotic index of B-CLL leukaemic cells in vitro and poor response to mitogens, analysis by conventional karyotyping is often hampered as there are only a few metaphases wherein smaller cryptic aberrations, and recurrent deletion cannot be detected[5]. In contrast, technique like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allows the detection of chromosomal aberrations not only in dividing cells but also in interphase nuclei. FISH is used for identifying abnormalities important to overall prognosis, disease progression and response to treatment. FISH also identifies abnormalities that are too small to be detected by study of metaphase chromosomes. It detects chromosome abnormalities in up to 80 per cent of B-CLL patients[6]. Thus, FISH has increased sensitivity and detection rate in comparison to conventional karyotyping. The most frequent recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in B-CLL are 13q14 deletion (40-60%), trisomy 12 (20-40%), 11q22 (ATM) deletion (10-25%), 14q32 (IgH) translocation (4-21%), 17p13 (TP53) deletion (4-15%) and 6q21 (MYB) deletion (5-9%)[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12].

The objective of this study was to score and evaluate the frequencies of the recurrent aberrations, i.e., del(13q14), trisomy 12, del(11q22), del(17p13), del(6q21) and IgH translocation by FISH in B-CLL patients, and to understand the role of recurrent aberrations in prognostication, risk stratification of B-CLL patients in terms of treatment-free survival (TFS), time-to-first treatment (TTFT) based upon the correlation of each aberration with clinical and haematological parameters. Another objective was to characterize IgH translocation positive cases into partner chromosome and their clinical assessment.

   Material & Methods Top

Newly diagnosed consecutive B-CLL patients referred to the Cancer Cytogenetics department, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, India, were enrolled in this study from January 2016 to December 2017. Follow up cases were excluded from the study. The diagnosis of B-CLL was based on the WHO 2016 guidelines[13]. The baseline workup included clinical and haematological parameters such as persistent lymphocytosis (peripheral lymphocytes ≥5×109/l and ≥40% lymphocytes in bone marrow), haemoglobin (Hb) level ≤10 g/dl, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (normal range 110-210 U/l), Rai stages (0, I, II, III or IV), presence/absence of splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. All the patients included in the study were positive for B-cell immunophenotype markers such as CD5, CD19 and CD23. The clonality of the circulating B lymphocytes as CLL was confirmed by flow cytometry and thus lymphoma cases were excluded. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee-III and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

FISH studies were performed on heparinized bone marrow aspirate or peripheral blood of 280 B-CLL patients using commercially available disease specific deletion probes LSI D13S319 (13q14)/LSI 13q34, LSI TP53 (17p13)/CEP17 (Zytovision, Germany); LSI ATM (11q22)/CEP11, LSI 6q21/SE6 (Kreatech Diagnostics, Netherlands); centromere CEP 12 and LSI break apart IgH translocation probe (Vysis Abbott Molecular, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Patients showing splitting of one fluorescence signal with the break apart IgH probe were analyzed for partner chromosome: t(8;14), t(11;14), t(14;18) and t(14;19) using dual colour, dual fusion probes LSI IgH/MYC:t(8;14) [Zytovision, Germany], IgH/CCND1:t(11;14), IgH/BCL2:t(14;18) [Vysis Abbott Molecular, Germany] and IgH/BCL3:t(14;19) (Kreatech Diagnostics, Netherlands), respectively. The limit of detection was five per cent for deletion probes, six per cent for break apart probe and two per cent for centromeric and dual-colour, dual-fusion probes. The limit of detection was standardized by in-house validation and it varied from laboratory to laboratory according to the FISH probes used in the assay[14].

In brief, peripheral blood or bone marrow sample was cultured using 5 ml complete culture medium consisting of Ham's-F12 + Glutamax medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10 per cent foetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) and one per cent antibiotic (Gibco, USA) for 24 h. The cultured samples were incubated at 37°C without any mitogens and cells were harvested by treatment with hypotonic solution (KCl) and preserved in their swollen state with Carnoy's fixative (3:1 ratio of methanol:glacial acetic acid)[15]. Cells were dropped on to slides and after addition of the probe, initial co-denaturation was done at 73°C, followed by hybridization at 37°C by overnight incubation. Excess probe was washed off and after addition of a counterstain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, the slides were examined with an Olympus BX61 fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corp., Japan) equipped with appropriate filters. In every specimen, 200 interphase cells were analyzed for each probe by two observers and images were captured using the Genesis ASI System (Applied Spectral Imaging Ltd, Israel). The identified abnormalities were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (ISCN 2016)[16].

Statistical analysis: To evaluate clinicopathological significance of cytogenetic aberrations (TFS and TTFT) based on their correlation with clinical and haematological parameters, FISH-positive cases were divided into three groups. (i) Group 1: patients with single aberration were studied, to assess the importance of a specific aberration without the influence of additional abnormalities; (ii) Group 2: patients with coexistence of two aberrations, i.e., those with coexistence of del(13q14) and other aberrations were compared with those with coexistence of two aberrations other than del(13q14); and (iii) Group 3: disease progression in patients with coexistence of >2 aberrations was studied by comparing them with cases with either single aberration or coexistence of two aberrations.

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp. NY, USA). A Chi-square test for independence was used to test if there was any association between the clinical parameters and the cytogenetic aberrations. One of the endpoints was to analyze the TFS and TTFT among the cytogenetic aberrations which was done using the Kaplan–Meier (log-rank) analysis.

   Results Top

The number of males and females included in the study was 215 and 65, respectively (n=280) with an age range of 30-86 yr (median: 60 yr). Among the 280 patients, 220 (79%) had genetic aberrations, of whom 137 (62%) had one aberration, 60 (27%) had two aberrations and 23 (10%) patients revealed coexistence of >2 aberrations. The most common cytogenetic aberration was del(13q14) (57%), followed by trisomy 12 (27%), del(11q22) (22%), t(14q32) (19%), del(17p13) (18%) and del(6q21) (9%) [Figure 1] and [Table 1]. Of the 126 patients with 13q14 deletions, 13 (10%) had biallelic (0R2G) or coexistence of monoallelic (1R2G) and biallelic deletions, while the remaining had only monoallelic deletion. IgH aberrations were identified 19 per cent (43/220) patients, of whom 49 per cent (21/43) had translocation (1Y1R1G), 47 per cent (20/43) had deletion in variable region of IgH (1Y1R/1Y1RdimG) and five per cent (2/43) had deletion in 3' IgH region (1Y1G) [Figure 2]. Of the 43 patients with translocation t(14q32), three had t(11;14)(q13;q32) (IgH/CCND1), seven had t(14;18)(q32;q21) (IgH/BCL2), four had t(14;19)(q32;q13) (IgH/BCL3) and the rest 26 patients had t(14q32) with an unidentified partner chromosome [Figure 3]. IgH characterization for three cases was not possible due to insufficient sample.

Figure 1: (A) LSI 13S319 (13q14.3) probe shows monoallelic deletion of 13q14.3 locus (one red and two green signals); (B) LSI probe 13S319 (13q14.3) shows biallelic deletion of 13q14.3 locus (zero red and two green signals); (C) CEP 12 probe shows trisomy 12 (three red signals); (D) LSI ATM (11q22.3)/CEP11 probe shows monoallelic deletion of ATM (one red and two green signals); (E) LSI 6q21/SE6 probe shows monoallelic deletion of 6q21 (one red and two green signals); (F) LSI TP53 (17p13.1)/CEP17 probe shows monoallelic deletion of TP53 (one red and two green signals).

Click here to view

Table 1: Frequency of cytogenetic aberrations in B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients (n=220)

Click here to view

Figure 2: (A) Dual-colour IgH break apart probe on interphase cells shows normal IgH allele (one yellow signal) and residual IgH (one red and one green signal); (B) Dual-colour IgH break apart probe on interphase cells shows normal IgH allele (one yellow signal), Residual 3' IgH (one red signal); (C) Dual-colour IgH break apart probe on interphase cells shows normal IgH allele (one yellow signal), deletion in 3' IgH region (one green signal).

Click here to view

Figure 3: (A) IgH/CCND1 dual-fusion probe shows IgH-CCND1 fusion (two yellow signals), 1 normal IgH allele and 1 normal CCND1 allele (one green and one red signal, respectively); (B) IgH/BCL3 dual-fusion probe shows IgH-BCL3 fusion (one yellow signal), one IgH allele and two normal BCL3 allele (one green and two red signals); (C) IGH/MYC dual-fusion probe shows t(14;?)(q32;?) with an unidentified partner, 3'IgH allele and 2 normal MYC allele (3 green and 2 red signals).

Click here to view

Correlation with clinical and haematological parameters: In group 1, of the 137 patients with single cytogenetic aberration, two prognostic categories were identified. The first category was patients with del(13q14) a sole abnormality which was associated with good prognostic markers having less number of patients with low Hb (P>0.06), high LDH (P<0.001), lymphadenopathy (P<0.05), splenomegaly (P<0.02), Rai stage 3 or 4 (P<0.01) and more number of patients having TFS (P<0.001). The second prognostic category was patients positive for either del(11q22) or del(17p13) in which the disease progression was more rapid due to their association with more aggressive clinical and haematological parameters, i.e., low Hb (P>1.00, P<0.02), high LDH (P>0.23, P>0.13), lymphadenopathy (P<0.03, P>0.26), splenomegaly (P<0.04, P<0.00), Rai stage 3 or 4 (P<0.01, P<0.02) and lower number of patients with TFS (P<0.03, P>0.25) [Table 2] and [Figure 4]. The median TTFT for del(13q14) was 380 days, and for del(11q22) and del(17p13), it was 16 and 11 days, respectively. Although insignificant, disease progression for patients with trisomy 12 was variable, and for del(6q21), it was aggressive. Patients with trisomy 12 were associated with both high-risk parameters such as high LDH (P<0.001), lymphocytosis (P>1.00), lymphadenopathy (P>0.44) and less TFS (P>0.57) and intermediate-risk parameters such as less patients with splenomegaly (P<0.01), low Hb (P>0.59), Rai stage 3 or 4 (P>0.10) and median TTFT of 89 days [Figure 4]. Deletion 6q21-positive patients had low Hb (P>0.14), high LDH (P>0.57) and Rai stage 3 or 4 (P>0.59); all the patients had lymphocytosis (P>1.00), splenomegaly (P>0.24) and lymphadenopathy (P>0.55) and none of the patients had TFS (P>0.29) and median TTFT of 18 days [Figure 4].

Table 2: Correlation of cytogenetic aberrations with clinical and haematopathological parameters in a cohort of 137 B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients (Group 1)

Click here to view

Figure 4: Probability of disease progression, as indicated by the treatment-free survival and time-to-first treatment in 137 patients with single cytogenetic aberrations.

Click here to view

Overall disease progression in patients with coexistence of two aberrations is more rapid, but when 41 patients positive for del(13q14) and any other aberration were compared with 19 patients with combination of any two cytogenetic aberrations other than del(13q14), the number of patients with TFS was higher due to the association with low-risk clinical and haematological parameters [Table 3]. Median TTFT for cases with del(13q14) was 256 days and for cases without del(13q14), it was 25 days [Figure 5].

Table 3: Comparison of clinical and laboratory data among 60 patients with del(13q14) and other aberration versus coexistence of other two aberrations (Group 2)

Click here to view

Figure 5: Probability of disease progression, as indicated by the treatment-free survival and time-to-first treatment in 60 patients with or without coexistence of del(13q14).

Click here to view

Patients with coexistence of >2 aberrations (23 cases) had a more advanced disease. High risk prognostic features i.e. low Hb levels, lymphocytosis, high LDH, lymphadenopathy, rai stage 3 or 4 and splenomegaly were found in 75-85 per cent of patients and 5 per cent of patients had TFS. TTFT was of 10 days in comparison to those having single or double aberration, for which the TTFT was 130 days.

The clinical significance of IgH translocation-positive patients characterized into partner chromosomes was also assessed. Patients positive for t(14;18)(q32;q21) had an intermediate disease progression with none of patients having low Hb. Lymphocytosis was present in all the patients, while high LDH lymphadenopathy, Rai stage 3 or 4 and splenomegaly were present in 20- 60 per cent patients. The median TTFT was 499 days and 40 per cent of the patients had TFS. The clinical correlation of other IgH partner chromosomes was not significant, but they represented an unfavourable disease outcome. Patients positive for t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(14;19)(q32;q13) and t(14;?)(q32;?) had low Hb count (67, 25 and 59%), high LDH (100, 100 and 65%), lymphocytosis (66, 100 and 95%), lymphadenopathy (100, 75 and 64%), splenomegaly (100, 50 and 70%), Rai stage 3 or 4 (100, 50 and 64%) and TFS (0, 25 and 18%). The median TTFT for each partner chromosome was 216, 8 and 16 days, respectively.

   Discussion Top

In the present study, chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 79 per cent of B-CLL patients by FISH which was in accordance to reported studies (50-80%)[6]. The incidence of del(13q14) (57%), trisomy 12 (27%), del(11q22) (22%), t(14q32) (19%) and del(6q21) (9%) was not deviated from that of previously reported western and Indian studies, i.e., del(13q14) (40-60%), trisomy 12 (20-40%), del(11q22) (10-25%), t(14q32) (4-21%) and del(6q21) (5-9%)[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]. In comparison to western literature (4-15%), the incidence of del(17p13) (18%) was higher in our study and previously reported studies which may be responsible for a different biology[17]. The study showed the efficiency of FISH to detect various types of chromosomal abnormalities such as deletion, translocation/partial deletion and aneusomy.

The most frequent abnormality associated with favourable prognosis was a deletion involving chromosome band 13q14, which occurred in 57 per cent of cases, a finding similar to literature[5],[6]. The significance of large 13q14 deletions is emphasized by involvement of multiple gene loci such as miR15a/16-1 micro RNA, RB1 and DLEU7 genes involved in key biological pathways like cell cycle control, NF-kB signalling which is responsible for tumour suppressor activity and different clinical courses of the disease[18],[19]. Trisomy 12 was the second most frequent recurrent chromosomal aberration (27%). The prognostic effect of trisomy 12 has been controversial and our study was also consistent with the previous study[12]. Consistent clonal del(13q14) and trisomy 12 appeared to be relatively specific drivers of B-CLL or B-cell malignancies[11],[20].

Apart from the reported independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis, i.e., del(17p13) reported in 18 per cent cases in the present study, two other adverse prognostic markers were identified – del(11q22) and del(6q21) with a frequency of 22 and 9 per cent, respectively. The higher frequency of TP53 deletion may reflect population difference. Inactivation of TP53 gene which has a role in cell death and cell cycle, is involved in del(17p13)[21]. Genes having an important role in pathogenesis of the del(11q22) disease are ATM located within the minimal region of loss at 11q23 and BIRC3 which is located near ATM gene[21],[22],[23],[24]. According to Cuneo et al[25], B-CLL with del(6q21) showed distinct haematological features and intermediate prognosis, but in our study, del(6q21) was identified as high-risk cytogenetic prognostic marker[26]. Edelmann et al[27] defined a region of 2.5Mb at 6q21 that was affected in 80 per cent of del(6q21) patients; however, no specific gene has been identified as responsible for the 6q pathogenesis.

Presence of specific IgH translocations is not a characteristic of B-CLL; however, it has been described that 2-26 per cent of patients carry a wide range of translocations[28] which in our study was 19 per cent. IgH translocations result in the deregulated expression of genes involved in several pathways having a role in control of cell proliferation, apoptosis, etc. In a majority of the cases, the translocated partner gene becomes transcriptionally deregulated as a consequence of its transposition into the immunoglobulin (IG) locus. Put et al[29] revealed that t(14;18)(q32;q21) in B-CLL was not associated with an unfavourable clinical outcome in a large patient cohort with a median TFS time of 48 months. Davids et al[30] demonstrated that the TTFT was significantly shorter among patients harbouring t(14q32) translocations without t(14;18)(q32;q21), compared with those having t(14;18)(q32;q21) which was consistent with our study. Patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32) and t(14;19)(q32;q13) were associated with poor prognosis[31],[32].

Frequencies of combinations of different chromosomal changes were in accordance to other studies[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]. The clinical outcome for the patients with combined chromosomal aberrations was adverse except for patients with coexistence of two aberrations having del(13q14) as one of the aberrations, the disease progression was slow[33]. Thus, for patients with coexistence of aberrations, the clinical course will depend on the combination of aberrations present.

In conclusion, our study showed FISH to be a sensitive and efficient technique in detecting the prevalence of various recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities. These recurrent aberrations are implemented as strong, independent prognostic and diagnostic markers for predicting the individual risk of the disease progression and, survival during early stages of disease detection. Continued understanding of the relationship between specific FISH abnormalities and clinical outcome will lead to improved risk stratification and better disease management. The molecular basis for clinical differences in the outcome may provide important insights into disease biology and should be subjected to further investigations.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

 

   References Top
1.Shanafelt TD, Call TG. Current approach to diagnosis and management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79 : 388-98.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Rosenquist R, Cortese D, Bhoi S, Mansouri L, Gunnarsson R. Prognostic markers and their clinical applicability in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Where do we stand? Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 54 : 2351-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Zwiebel JA, Cheson BD. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Staging and prognostic factors. Semin Oncol 1998; 25 : 42-59.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Autore F, Strati P, Laurenti L, Ferrajoli A. Morphological, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with trisomy 12: A comprehensive review. Haematologica 2018; 103 : 931-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Juliusson G, Oscier DG, Fitchett M, Ross FM, Stockdill G, Mackie MJ, et al. Prognostic subgroups in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia defined by specific chromosomal abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1990; 323 : 720-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Puiggros A, Blanco G, Espinet B. Genetic abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Where we are and where we go. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014 : 1-13.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Flanagan MB, Sathanoori M, Surti U, Soma L, Swerdlow SH. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma lymphoid tissue biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130 : 620-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Quijano S, López A, Rasillo A, Sayagués JM, Barrena S, Sánchez ML, et al. Impact of trisomy 12, del(13q), del(17p), and del(11q) on the immunophenotype, DNA ploidy status, and proliferative rate of leukemic B-cells in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2008; 74 : 139-49.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Durak B, Akay OM, Aslan V, Ozdemir M, Sahin F, Artan S, et al. Prognostic impact of chromosome alterations detected by FISH in Turkish patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2009; 188 : 65-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Ripollés L, Ortega M, Ortuño F, González A, Losada J, Ojanguren J, et al. Genetic abnormalities and clinical outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2006; 171 : 57-64.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Chena C, Arrossagaray G, Scolnik M, Palacios MF, Slavutsky I. Interphase cytogenetic analysis in Argentinean B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients: Association of trisomy 12 and del(13q14). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003; 146 : 154-60.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Amare PS, Gadage V, Jain H, Nikalje S, Manju S, Mittal N, et al. Clinico-pathological impact of cytogenetic subgroups in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Experience from India. Indian J Cancer 2013; 50 : 261-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Döhner H, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood 2018; 131 : 2745-60.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Saxe DF, Persons DL, Wolff DJ, Theil KS; Cytogenetics Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization using an analyte-specific reagent for detection of abnormalities involving the mixed lineage leukaemia gene. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136 : 47-52.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Howe B, Umrigar A, Tsien F. Chromosome preparation from cultured cells. J Vis Exp 2014; 83 : 50203.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Jordan JM, Simons A, Schmid M, editors. ISCN 2016: An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature. New York: Karger; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Saxena R, Kumar R, Sazawal S, Mahapatra M. CLL in India may have a different biology from that in the West. Blood 2016; 128 : 5574.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Parker H, Rose-Zerilli MJ, Parker A, Chaplin T, Wade R, Gardiner A, et al. 13q deletion anatomy and disease progression in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukaemia 2011; 25 : 489-97.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Calin GA, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, Bichi R, Zupo S, Noch E, et al. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 : 15524-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Liso V, Capalbo S, Lapietra A, Pavone V, Guarini A, Specchia G. Evaluation of trisomy 12 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Haematologica 1999; 84 : 212-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Döhner H, Fischer K, Bentz M, Hansen K, Benner A, Cabot G, et al. p53 gene deletion predicts for poor survival and non-response to therapy with purine analogs in chronic B-cell leukaemias. Blood 1995; 85 : 1580-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.Neilson JR, Auer R, White D, Bienz N, Waters JJ, Whittaker JA, et al. Deletions at 11q identify a subset of patients with typical CLL who show consistent disease progression and reduced survival. Leukaemia 1997; 11 : 1929-32.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, James MR, Benner A, Weilguni T, Bentz M, et al. 11q deletions identify a new subset of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia characterized by extensive nodal involvement and inferior prognosis. Blood 1997; 89 : 2516-22.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Delgado J, Espinet B, Oliveira AC, Abrisqueta P, de la Serna J, Collado R, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: A retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and therapy results. Br J Haematol 2012; 157 : 67-74.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Cuneo A, Rigolin GM, Bigoni R, De Angeli C, Veronese A, Cavazzini F, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 6q- shows distinct haematological features and intermediate prognosis. Leukaemia 2004; 18 : 476-83.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Stilgenbauer S, Bullinger L, Benner A, Wildenberger K, Bentz M, Döhner K, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of 6q deletions in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukaemia 1999; 13 : 1331-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Edelmann J, Holzmann K, Miller F, Winkler D, Bühler A, Zenz T, et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia reveals new recurrent genomic alterations. Blood 2012; 120 : 4783-94.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.DE Braekeleer M, Tous C, Guéganic N, LE Bris MJ, Basinko A, Morel F, et al. Immunoglobulin gene translocations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A report of 35 patients and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2016; 4 : 682-94.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Put N, Meeus P, Chatelain B, Rack K, Boeckx N, Nollet F, et al. Translocation t(14;18) is not associated with inferior outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukaemia 2009; 23 : 1201-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    30.Davids MS, Vartanov A, Werner L, Neuberg D, Dal Cin P, Brown JR. Controversial fluorescence in situ hybridization cytogenetic abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: New insights from a large cohort. Br J Haematol 2015; 170 : 694-703.  Back to cited text no. 30
    31.Avet-Loiseau H, Garand R, Gaillard F, Daviet A, Mellerin MP, Robillard N, et al. Detection of t(11;14) using interphase molecular cytogenetics in mantle cell lymphoma and atypical chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998; 23 : 175-82.  Back to cited text no. 31
    32.Huh YO, Schweighofer CD, Ketterling RP, Knudson RA, Vega F, Kim JE, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with t(14;19)(q32;q13) is characterized by atypical morphologic and immunophenotypic features and distinctive genetic features. Am J Clin Pathol 2011; 135 : 686-96.  Back to cited text no. 32
    33.Dyke DL, Shanafelt TD, Call TG, Zent CS, Smoley SA, Rabe KG, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of the prognostic significance of 13q deletions in patients with b-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2010; 148 : 544-50.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

 

Top  

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif