Adler, P., Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Sage.
Google Scholar Allen, J., Kildea, S., Stapleton, H. (2015). How does group antenatal care function within a caseload midwifery model? A critical ethnographic analysis. Midwifery, 31(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.009
Google Scholar Arnold, R., van Teijlingen, E., Ryan, K., Holloway, I. (2015). Understanding Afghan healthcare providers: A qualitative study of the culture of care in a Kabul maternity hospital. Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122(2), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13179
Google Scholar Atkinson, P., Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Sage.
Google Scholar Aubrey, C., Mumtaz, Z., Patterson, P. B., Chari, R., Mitchell, B. F. (2017). Accommodating immigrant women’s preferences for female health care providers. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 129(5), 919–924. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001984
Google Scholar Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Lewis, S., Saul, J., Carroll, S., Bitz, J. (2012). Large-system transformation in health care: A realist review. Milbank Q, 90(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x
Google Scholar Black, B. P. (2011). Truth telling and severe fetal diagnosis: A virtue ethics perspective. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 25(1), 13–20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Braithwaite, J., Churruca, K., Long, J., Ellis, L., Herkes, J. (2018). When complexity science meets implementation science: A theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 63. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z
Google Scholar Bunce, A. E., Gold, R., Davis, J. V., McMullen, C. K., Jaworski, V., Mercer, M., Nelson, C. (2014). Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: Explaining the complexity of implementation. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0607-0
Google Scholar Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, V., Sheehan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: The insider/outsider debate. Midwifery, 28(1), 52–60.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Chen, F. H., Chen, S. L., Hu, W. Y. (2015). Taiwanese women’s experiences of lactation suppression after stillbirth. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 44(4), 510–517.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Cheyney, M., Everson, C., Burcher, P. (2014). Homebirth transfers in the United States: Narratives of risk, fear, and mutual accommodation. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314524028
Google Scholar Curtis, K., Fry, M., Shaban, R. Z., Considine, J. (2017). Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13586
Google Scholar Danielsen, L. (2017). Enforcing ‘Progress’: A story of an MDG 5 indicator and maternal health in Malawi. Development and Change, 48(3), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12307
Google Scholar Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. London: Butterworths.
Google Scholar Dove, S., Muir-Cochrane, E. (2014). Being safe practitioners and safe mothers: A critical ethnography of continuity of care midwifery in Australia. Midwifery, 30(10), 1063–1072.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Eberle, T. S., Maeder, C. (2011). Organizational ethnography. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative Research (pp. 53–74). Sage.
Google Scholar Eccles, M. P., Foy, R., Sales, A., Wensing, M., Mittman, B. (2012). Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review. Implementation Science, 7(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-71
Google Scholar Finlay, S., Sandall, J. (2009). “Someone’s rooting for you”: Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare. Social Science and Medicine, 69(8), 1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.029
Google Scholar Flacking, R., Dykes, F. (2013). ‘Being in a womb’ or ‘playing musical chairs’: The impact of place and space on infant feeding in NICUs. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13, 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-179
Google Scholar Fogarty International Center . (2013). What is implementation science? http://www.fic.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/News/Events/implementation-science/Pages/faqs.aspx
Google Scholar Francis, K. (2013). Ethnography. In Taylor, B., Francis, K. (Eds.), Qualitative research in the health sciences (pp. 66–76). Routledge.
Google Scholar Gagnon, A. J., Carnevale, F., Mehta, P., et al. (2013). Developing population interventions with migrant women for maternal-child health: A focused ethnography. BMC Public Health, 13, 471.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
Google Scholar Geertz, C. (1998). Deep hanging out. The New York Review of Books, 45, 69.
Google Scholar Goodwin, L., Hunter, B., Jones, A. (2018). The midwife–woman relationship in a South Wales community: Experiences of midwives and migrant Pakistani women in early pregnancy. Health Expectations, 21(1), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12629
Google Scholar Grassley, J. S., Clark, M., Schleis, J. (2015). An institutional ethnography of nurses’ support of breastfeeding on the night shift. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 44(5), 567–577.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Greenhalgh, T. (2018). How to Implement Evidence-Based Healthcare. Wiley Blackwell.
Google Scholar Greenhalgh, T., Swinglehurst, D. (2011). Studying technology use as social practice: The untapped potential of ethnography. BMC Medicine, 9(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-45
Google Scholar Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar | Crossref Harte, J. D., Sheehan, A., Stewart, S. C., Foureur, M. (2016). Childbirth supporters’ experiences in a built hospital birth environment: Exploring inhibiting and facilitating factors in negotiating the supporter role. Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(3), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715622006
Google Scholar Hawe, P., Bond, L., Butler, H. (2009). Knowledge theories can inform evaluation practice: What can a complexity lens add? New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(124), 89–100.
Google Scholar | Crossref Herbert, S. (2000). For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189102
Google Scholar Higginbottom, G. M. A., Safipour, J., Mumtaz, Z., Chiu, Y., Paton, P., Pillay, J. (2013). “I have to do what I believe”: Sudanese women’s beliefs and resistance to hegemonic practices at home and during experiences of maternity care in Canada. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-51
Google Scholar Higginbottom, G. M. A., Safipour, J., Yohani, S., O’Brien, B., Mumtaz, Z., Paton, P. (2015). An ethnographic study of communication challenges in maternity care for immigrant women in rural Alberta. Midwifery, 31(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.009
Google Scholar Holmes, B., Best, A., Davies, H., Hunter, D., Kelly, M., Marshall, M., Rycroft-Malone, J. (2017). Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: A call to action. Evidence and Policy, 13(3), 539–560.
Google Scholar | Crossref Hugill, K., Letherby, G., Reid, T., Lavender, T. (2013). Experiences of fathers shortly after the birth of their preterm infants. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 42(6), 655–663.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Hunter, B. (2010). Implementing a national policy initiative to support normal birth: Lessons from the all wales clinical pathway for normal labour. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 55(3), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.12.014
Google Scholar Hunter, B., Segrott, J. (2010). Using a clinical pathway to support normal birth: Impact on practitioner roles and working practices. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care, 37(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00410.x
Google Scholar Kemp, J., Sandall, J. (2010). Normal birth, magical birth: The role of the 36-week birth talk in caseload midwifery practice. Midwifery, 26(2), 211–221.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kennedy, H. P., Grant, J., Walton, C., Sandall, J. (2013). Elective caesarean delivery: A mixed method qualitative investigation. Midwifery, 29(12), E138–E144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.008
Google Scholar Kennedy, H. P., Grant, J., Walton, C., Shaw-Battista, J., Sandall, J. (2010). Normalizing birth in England: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 55(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.006
Google Scholar Lalor, J. G., Casey, D., Elliott, N., Coyne, I., Comiskey, C., Higgins, A., Murphy, K., Devane, D., Begley, C. (2013). Using case study within a sequential explanatory design to evaluate the impact of specialist and advanced practice roles on clinical outcomes: The SCAPE study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 55–55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-55
Google Scholar Lange, I. L., Kanhonou, L., Goufodji, S., Ronsmans, C., Filippi, V. (2016). The costs of ‘free’: Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin’s caesarean section exemption policy. Social Science & Medicine, 168, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.008
Google Scholar Lee, D. T. S., Ngai, I. S. L., Ng, M. M. T., Lok, I. H., Yip, A. S. K., Chung, T. K. H. (2009). Antenatal taboos among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Midwifery, 25(2), 104–113.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Liamputtong, P. (2011). Research Methods in health: Foundations for evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Liamputtong, P., Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Google Scholar Lindsay, P., Sandall, J., Humphrey, C. (2012). The social dimensions of safety incident reporting in maternity care: The influence of working relationships and group processes. Social Science and Medicine, 75(10), 1793–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.030
Google Scholar Lofland, J., Lofland, L. H. (1971). Analyzing social settings. A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Google Scholar Logsdon, K., Smith-Morris, C. (2017). An ethnography on perceptions of pain in Dutch “Natural” childbirth. Midwifery, 55, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.004
Google Scholar Mackenzie, A. E. (1994). Evaluating ethnography: Considerations for analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(4), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01150.x
Google Scholar Mays, N., Pope, C. (1995). Observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311(6998), 182–184.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Miltenburg, A. S., Kiritta, R. F., Meguid, T., Sundby, J. (2018). Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: Identification of areas that need improvement. Reprod Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1
Google Scholar Mondy, T., Fenwick, J., Leap, N., Foureur, M. (2016). How domesticity dictates behaviour in the birth space: Lessons for designing birth environments in institutions wanting to promote a positive experience of birth. Midwifery, 43, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.009
Google Scholar Morgan, S., J., Pullon, S. R. H., Macdonald, L. M., McKinlay, E. M., Gray, B. V. (2016). Case study observational research: A framework for conducting case study research where observation data are the focus. Qualitative Health Research, 27(7), 1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316649160
Google Scholar Murphy, E., Dingwall, R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 2223–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008
Google Scholar Newnham, E., McKellar, L. V., Pincombe, J. I. (2015). Documenting risk: A comparison of policy and information pamphlets for using epidural or water in labour. Women and Birth, 28(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.012
Google Scholar Newnham, E., McKellar, L. V., Pincombe, J. I. (2017a). ‘It’s your body, but. . .’ Mixed messages in childbirth education: Findings from a hospital ethnography. Midwifery, 55, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.003
Google Scholar Newnham, E., McKellar, L. V., Pincombe, J. I. (2017b). Paradox of the institution: Findings from a hospital labour ward ethnography. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
Google Scholar | Crossref Newnham, E., Pincombe, J. I., McKellar, L. V. (2013). Access or egress? Questioning the “ethics” of ethics committee review for an ethnographic doctoral research study in a childbirth setting. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 121–136. http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p121-136Newnham0267
Google Scholar Newnham, E., Pincombe, J. I., McKellar, L. V. (2016). Critical medical anthropology in midwifery research: A framework for ethnographic analysis. Global qualitative nursing research, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393616675029
Google Scholar Newnham, E., Small, K., Allen, J. (2021). Critical ethnography in maternity care research: Bridging creativity and rigour—a discussion paper. Midwifery, 99, 103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103014
Google Scholar O’Boyle, C. (2013). ‘Just waiting to be hauled over the coals’: Home birth midwifery in Ireland. Midwifery, 29(8), 988–995.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline O’Boyle, C. (2014). “Being with” while retaining and asserting professional midwifery power and authority in home birth. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-03-2013-0005