1. Faculty of Pain Medicine (FPM) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists . Opioids aware: about pain, https://www.fpm.ac.uk/opioids-aware-understanding-pain-medicines-pain/about-pain (accessed 4 July 2020).
Google Scholar2. Fayaz, A, Croft, P, Langford, RM, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010364.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. The British Pain Society . British Pain Society Press release: chronic pain costs the UK £billions but research funding is inadequate, https://www.britishpainsociety.org/mediacentre/news/british-pain-society-press-release-chronic-pain-costs-the-uk-billions-but-research-funding-is-inadequate/ (accessed 4 June 2020).
Google Scholar4. Royal College of General Practitioners . Chronic pain, https://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/resources/a-to-z-clinical-resources/chronic-pain.aspx (accessed 4 July 2020).
Google Scholar5. Faculty of Pain Medicine (FPM) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists . Opioids aware: long term prescribing, https://www.fpm.ac.uk/opioids-aware-structured-approach-opioid-prescribing/long-term-prescribing (accessed 4 July 2020).
Google Scholar6. Chou, R, Turner, JA, Devine, EB, et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 276–286.
Google Scholar | Crossref7. Krebs, EE, Gravely, A, Nugent, S, et al. Effect of opioid vs nonopioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain: the SPACE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 319(9): 872–882.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Eriksen, J, Sjøgren, P, Bruera, E, et al. Critical issues on opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: an epidemiological study. Pain 2006; 125(1–2): 172–179.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Curtis, H, Croker, R, Walker, A, et al. Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998–2018: a retrospective database study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6(2): 140–150.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Foy, R, Leaman, B, McCrorie, C, et al. Prescribed opioids in primary care: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of influence of patient and practice characteristics. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010276.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Public Health Research Consortium . Prescribing patterns in dependence forming medicines, 2017, https://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/1800571/Trends-in-long-term-prescribing-of-dependence-forming-medicines.pdf (accessed 3 July 2020).
Google Scholar12. Ashaye, T, Hounsome, N, Carnes, D, et al. Opioid prescribing for chronic musculoskeletal pain in UK primary care: results from a cohort analysis of the COPERS trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8(6): e019491.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain (NG193), 2021, https://www.nice.org.uk/ (accessed 10 April 2021).
Google Scholar14. Stannard, C. Opioids in the UK: what’s the problem? BMJ 2013; 347: f5108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual 2019 . In: Chapter 11: Scoping reviews - JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - JBI GLOBAL WIKI.
Google Scholar16. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist , http://prisma-statement.org/ (accessed 1 July 2020).
Google Scholar17. Bergman, AA, Matthias, MS, Coffing, J, et al. Contrasting tensions between patients and PCPs in chronic pain management: a qualitative study. Pain Med 2013; 14(11): 1689–1697.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Esquibel, A, Borkan, J. Doctors and patients in pain: conflict and collaboration in opioid prescription in primary care. Pain 2014; 155(12): 2575–2582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Buchman, D, Ho, A, Illes, J. You present like a drug addict: patient and clinician perspectives on trust and trustworthiness in chronic pain management. Pain Med 2016; 17(8): 1394–1406.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Matthias, MS, Krebs, EE, Bergman, AA, et al. Communicating about opioids for chronic pain: a qualitative study of patient attributions and the influence of the patient-physician relationship. Eur J Pain 2014; 18(6): 835–843.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Wallace, LS, Wexler, RK, McDougle, L, et al. Voices that may not otherwise be heard: a qualitative exploration into the perspectives of primary care patients living with chronic pain. J Pain Res 2014; 7: 291–299.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Matthias, MS, Parpart, A, Nyland, K, et al. The patient-provider relationship in chronic pain care: providers’ perspectives. Pain Med 2010; 11(11): 1688–1697.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Shields, C, Fuzzell, L, Christ, S, et al. Patient and provider characteristics associated with communication about opioids: an observational study. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102(5): 888–894.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Henry, SG, Bell, R, Fenton, J, et al. Communication about chronic pain and opioids in primary care: impact on patient and physician visit experience. Pain 2018; 159(2): 371–379.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Matthias, MS, Talib, TL, Huffman, MA. Managing chronic pain in an opioid crisis: what is the role of shared decision-making? Health Commun 2020; 35(10): 1239–1247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Frank, J, Levy, C, Matlock, D, et al. Patients’ perspectives on tapering of chronic opioid therapy: a qualitative study. Pain Med 2016; 17(10): 1838–1847.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Henry, SG, Paterniti, DA, Feng, B, et al. Patients’ experience with opioid tapering: a conceptual model with recommendations for clinicians. J Pain 2019; 20(2): 181–191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Sherman, KJ, Walker, RL, Saunders, K, et al. Doctor-patient trust among chronic pain patients on chronic opioid therapy after opioid risk reduction initiatives: a survey. J Am Board Fam Med 2018; 31(4): 578–587.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Kennedy, LC, Binswanger, IA, Mueller, SR, et al. ‘Those conversations in my experience don’t go well’: a qualitative study of primary care provider experiences tapering long-term opioid medications. Pain Med 2018; 19(11): 2201–2211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Matthias, MS, Johnson, N, Shields, C, et al. ‘I’m not gonna pull the rug out from under you’. Patient-provider communication about opioid tapering. J Pain 2017; 18(11): 1365–1373.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Henry, SG, Gosdin, M, White, A, et al. ‘It sometimes doesn’t even work’: patient opioid assessments as clues to therapeutic flexibility in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35(6): 1635–1640.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Buonora, M, Perez, HR, Stumph, J, et al. Medical record documentation about opioid tapering: examining benefit-to-harm framework and patient engagement. Pain Med 2020; 21(10): 2574–2582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. McCrorie, C, Closs, SJ, House, A, et al. Understanding long-term opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16: 121–129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Kesten, J, Thomas, K, Scott, L, et al. Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70(691): e120–e129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Desveaux, L, Saragosa, M, Kithulegoda, N, et al. Understanding the behavioural determinants of opioid prescribing among family physicians: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2019; 20(1): 59.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Kennedy, M, Pallotti, P, Dickinson, R, et al. ‘If you can’t see a dilemma in this situation you should probably regard it as a warning’: a metasynthesis and theoretical modelling of general practitioners’ opioid prescription experiences in primary care. Br J Pain 2019; 13(3): 159–176.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI37. Maynard, D, Heritage, J. Conversation analysis, doctor patient interaction and medical communication. Med Educ 2005; 39(4): 428–435.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Parry, R, Pino, M, Faull, C, et al. Acceptability and design of video based research on healthcare communication: evidence and recommendations. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99(8): 1271–1284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Psathas, G. Reflections on the history of ethnomethodology: the Boston and Manchester ‘schools’. Am Sociol 2008; 39(1): 38–67.
Google Scholar | Crossref40. Barnes, RK. Conversation analysis of communication in medical care: description and beyond. Res Lang Soc Interact 2019; 52(3): 300–315.
Google Scholar | Crossref41. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes (NG5), 2015, https://www.nice.org.uk (accessed 10 July 2020).
Google Scholar42. National Health Service (England) . Shared decision making programme, 2018, https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/shared-decision-making/ (accessed 5 July 2020).
Google Scholar43. Ha, JF, Longnecker, N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J 2010; 10(1): 38–43.
Google Scholar | Medline44. National Health Service (England) . Personalised care institute, https://www.england.nhs.uk/personalisedcare/supporting-health-and-care-staff-to-deliver-personalised-care/personalised-care-institute/ (accessed 1 February 2021).
Google Scholar45. Boivin, A, Richards, T, Forsythe, L, et al. Evaluating patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2018; 363: k5147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. National Institute for Health Research . Going the extra mile: improving the nation’s health and wellbeing through public involvement in research, 2015, www.nihr.ac.uk (accessed 1 February 2021).
Google Scholar