EDTA plasma samples of 589 participants were available for the laboratory analysis of this study. The plasma samples were collected at baseline, placed on ice, centrifuged at 4°C, immediately stored at −80°C, and left unthawed until analysis. The samples were stored from time of inclusion until 2019.
To determine the binding susceptibility of lipoproteins to proteoglycans, human aortic proteoglycans were isolated from the intima-media of atherosclerotic human aortas (20Bancells C. Benítez S. Jauhiainen M. Ordóñez-Llanos J. Kovanen P.T. Villegas S. Sánchez-Quesada J.L. Oörni K. High binding affinity of electronegative LDL to human aortic proteoglycans depends on its aggregation level.), and the glycosaminoglycan content of proteoglycans was quantified as overall marker of proteoglycans (21Ahmed O. Littmann K. Gustafsson U. Pramfalk C. Öörni K. Larsson L. Minniti M.E. Sahlin S. Camejo G. Parini P. Eriksson M. Ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin reduces remnant cholesterol without affecting biliary lipid concentrations in gallstone patients.). Then, wells of polystyrene 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with 100 μl of proteoglycans (50 μg/ml in PBS) by incubation at 4°C overnight. Wells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at 37°C. Wells without proteoglycan coating served as controls for unspecific binding. To measure lipoprotein binding to the immobilized proteoglycans, 1 μl of plasma (derived from RTRs at baseline) was added to the wells in a buffer containing 140 mmol/l NaCl, 2 mmol/l MgCl2, 5 mmol/l CaCl2, and 10 mmol/l MES, pH 5.5, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The wells were washed with 10 mmol/l MES-50 mmol/l NaCl, pH 5.5, and the amount of bound TC was determined using the Amplex Red cholesterol kit (Molecular Probes). Each sample was analyzed in duplicate and the nonspecific binding in a single well had been blocked by the blocking buffer. The nonspecific binding consistently accounts for about 5% of the binding to the PG-coated wells. The assay was performed over a duration of several weeks. The day-to-day variation of the measurement is 21Ahmed O. Littmann K. Gustafsson U. Pramfalk C. Öörni K. Larsson L. Minniti M.E. Sahlin S. Camejo G. Parini P. Eriksson M. Ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin reduces remnant cholesterol without affecting biliary lipid concentrations in gallstone patients., 22ApoB-100 lipoprotein complex formation with intima proteoglycans as a cause of atherosclerosis and its possible ex vivo evaluation as a disease biomarker.). Statistical analysisBaseline characteristics of the study population were analyzed for gender-stratified tertiles of levels of bound TC/plasma LDL-C (low, medium, and high). Normally distributed continuous variables are depicted as the mean ± standard deviation, whereas continuous variables with a skewed distribution are given as the median [25th–75th percentile]. Categorical variables are summarized by absolute numbers (percentages).
Baseline characteristics were tested for differences among groups with low, medium, and high LPBS based on sex-stratified tertiles. Baseline characteristics for normally distributed continuous variables were tested for differences among groups with one-way ANOVA. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences between groups for continuous variables with a skewed distribution. Group differences in categorical data were tested with Pearson chi-squared test.
LPBS of subjects who reached the respective end points was compared with values of subjects not reaching the end points of the study by independent samples t test. Similarly, the LPBS for males and females was computed using independent samples t test. Subsequently, all characteristics with a P < 0.10 across gender-stratified tertiles of LPBS were entered into a step-wise multivariable linear regression model with backward elimination (P < 0.05) to identify variables independently associated with LPBS.
Multivariable Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for the primary end points. Adjustment of potential confounders was used to assess the independent association of LPBS with the end points chronic GF and cardiovascular mortality. Potential confounders were determined as known risk factors of chronic GF and CVD in RTRs and included age, sex, eGFR, periods of acute rejection, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, primary renal disease, diabetes mellitus, BMI, dialysis time, type of transplantation, use of calcineurin inhibitors, use of proliferation inhibitors, use of statins, time between transplantation and baseline, and donor age. Validity of proportional hazard assumptions was tested using Schoenfeld residuals. Furthermore, subgroup analysis using interaction tests were performed in which HRs were determined across categories of baseline characteristics. For continuous variables, the median value was used as cutoff. For the end point chronic GF, the subject characteristics were sex (male vs. female), age (<52.1 vs. >52.1 years), use of statins (yes vs. no), eGFR (<46.7 and ≥46.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and period of acute rejection (yes vs. no).
To compare the relevance of the proposed novel functionality parameter with a traditional quantitative parameter, statistical analyses were repeated for plasma concentration of LDL-C at baseline and results were compared with those of LPBS.
Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses and visualization of data were conducted using STATA® Statistical Software, Release 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
ResultsIn this longitudinal follow-up study, the LPBS was measured in 589 RTRs. Individual LPBS values were expressed as the ratio between proteoglycan-bound cholesterol and plasma LDL-C levels (nmol/mmol). Baseline characteristics according to sex-stratified tertiles of LPBS are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of TC, LDL-C, apoA-I (each PP = 0.004), apoB (P = 0.012), and the LDL-C/apoB ratio (PP = 0.04) and BMI (P = 0.015) showed a significant inverse association with binding susceptibility, but for other potential cardiovascular risk factors including age, history of cardiovascular events, diabetes mellitus, tobacco abuse, plasma triglycerides, and HDL-C, no relationship with LPBS was evident.Table 1Baseline characteristics according to sex-stratified tertiles of lipoprotein-proteoglycan binding susceptibility
CVA, cerebrovascular accident; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; Lp, lipoprotein; PG, proteoglycan; TC, total cholesterol; TIA, transient ischemic attack; Tx, transplantation
Normally distributed continuous variables are depicted as the mean ± standard deviation, continuous variables with a skewed distribution are given as the median [25th–75th percentile], and categorical variables are summarized by absolute numbers (percentages). Differences between tertiles of lipoprotein-proteoglycan binding susceptibility were tested using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables with a skewed distribution, and Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical variables.
Subsequently, backward multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess which variables are determinants of LPBS in RTRs (Table 2). The concentration of TC (standardized β = −0.24, PPR2 was 0.10.Table 2Predictors of lipoprotein binding susceptibility
All variables with P < 0.1 between tertiles were entered into a stepwise linear regression with backward elimination.
To further explore factors associated with LPBS, we first correlated the LDL-C/apoB ratio as an, allowedly, relatively crude but easy to calculate measure of the LDL size with LPBS. Previously, a smaller size of LDL particles had been identified as a determinant of increased binding to proteoglycans (23Sartipy P. Camejo G. Svensson L. Hurt-Camejo E. Phospholipase A(2) modification of low density lipoproteins forms small high density particles with increased affinity for proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans.). Surprisingly, an overall significant positive correlation was observed in the RTR (r = 0.159, PP = 0.01), whereas medium- (r = −0.07, not significant) or large-sized LDL particles (r = 0.03, P = not significant) did not correlate with LPBS. Because oxidative modification had been shown to decrease binding of apoB-containing lipoproteins to proteoglycans (24Oörni K. Pentikäinen M.O. Annila A. Kovanen P.T. Oxidation of low density lipoprotein particles decreases their ability to bind to human aortic proteoglycans. Dependence on oxidative modification of the lysine residues.), we measured in a subset of our cohort (n = 40) the conjugated diene content in these particles and correlated the result with LPBS. Consistent with previous reports, also in RTRs, a significant negative correlation between conjugated dienes and LPBS was observed (r = −0.46, P = 0.003). In addition, enzymatic modification by sPLA2-IIA was reported to increase binding of LDL to proteoglycans (23Sartipy P. Camejo G. Svensson L. Hurt-Camejo E. Phospholipase A(2) modification of low density lipoproteins forms small high density particles with increased affinity for proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans.). Also, this result could be replicated in our cohort because plasma levels of sPLA2-IIA correlated positively with LPBS (r = 0.42, P = 0.016, n = 40). Because it has been previously demonstrated that Lp(a) is increased among patients with a low eGFR, (25Hopewell J.C. Haynes R. Baigent C. The role of lipoprotein (a) in chronic kidney disease: thematic review series: lipoprotein (a): coming of age at last.) which in turn leads to a higher binding affinity to proteoglycans (26Lundstam U. Hurt-Camejo E. Olsson G. Sartipy P. Camejo G. Wiklund O. Proteoglycans contribution to association of Lp(a) and LDL with smooth muscle cell extracellular matrix.), we measured Lp(a) levels in our study population. Lp(a) was not correlated with LPBS (r = −0.06, P = 0.13). Furthermore, an adjusted Cox regression with Lp(a) as independent variable showed that there is no significant association between Lp(a) levels and GF (HR = 1.11, P = 0.25).Data concerning specific causes of death were available for a median follow-up of 7 years. Of 130 (22%) patients who died in this period, 68 did so because of confirmed cardiovascular causes (12% of the total study population, 52% of the deceased patients). Furthermore, 29 (5% of the total study population, 22% of the deceased patients) patients died from malignancy, 23 (4% of the total study population, 18% of the deceased patients) from an infectious death, and 10 (2% of the total study population, 7% of the deceased patients) from other causes. During the median follow-up of 9.5 years for GF, a total of 73 (13%) subjects experienced this end point.
At baseline, LDL-C as well as LPBS were comparable between survivors and deceased RTRs, with respect to cardiovascular mortality (LDL-C: 3.90 ± 1.0 vs. 3.88 ± 1.0 mmol/l, P = 0.87; LPBS: 1.34 ± 0.42 vs. 1.29 ± 0.5 nmol/mmol, P = 0.33). While baseline LDL-C levels were also similar in patients developing GF or not (4.03 ± 1.38 vs. 3.88 ± 0.91 mmol/l, P = 0.22), LPBS was significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed GF than in those with a surviving graft (1.47 ± 0.63 vs. 1.32 ± 0.39 nmol/mmol, P = 0.003).
Cox regression analysis revealed that neither LPBS nor the classical biomarker LDL-C was associated with CVD mortality (Table 3); this conclusion remained valid after adjustment for a number of potential confounding factors in different statistical models. However, Cox regression analysis showed a prospective association between LPBS and chronic GF (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.24–2.84; P = 0.003, Table 4, model 1). Adjusting for age and sex did not considerably reduce this association (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21–2.81; P = 0.004, Table 4, model 2).Table 3Comparison between the association of either LDL function (LPBS) or mass levels of LDL-C with cardiovascular mortality
HR, hazard ratio; LPBS, lipoprotein-proteoglycan binding susceptibility.
Model 1: crude; model 2: adjusted for age and sex; model 3: model 2+ adjustment diabetes mellitus; model 4: model 2+ adjustment for BMI; model 5: model 2+ adjustment for dialysis time and time between transplantation and inclusion; model 6: model 2+ adjustment for type of transplantation and donor age; model 7: model 2+ adjustment for use of calcineurin inhibitors and proliferation inhibitors; model 8: model 2+ adjustment for use of statins.
Table 4Comparison between the association of either LDL function (LPBS) or mass levels of LDL-C with chronic graft failure
HR, hazard ratio; LPBS, lipoprotein-proteoglycan binding susceptibility.
Model 1: crude; model 2: adjusted for age and sex; model 3: model 2 + adjustment for use of statins; model 4: model 2 + adjustment for estimated glomerular filtration rate; model 5: model 2 + adjustment for period of acute rejection; model 6: model 2 + adjustment for number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, primary renal disease and period of acute rejection; model 7: model 2+ adjustment for dialysis time and time between transplantation and baseline; model 8: model 2+ adjustment for type of transplantation and donor age.
Comparably, adjustment for a number of other potentially impacting factors, namely the use of statins, periods of acute rejection, number of HLA mismatches, primary renal disease, dialysis time, time between transplantation and inclusion, type of transplantation, and donor age did not appreciatively change the significance of the prospective association. However, after additional adjustments for eGFR, significance was lost (HR, 1.25, 95% CI, 0.85–1.82; P = 0.25, Table 4, model 7). We attempted to further delineate the relationship of LPBS and eGFR. Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed that there is no significant correlation between eGFR and LPBS (r = −0.03, P = 0.52). Then, an interaction term was computed and the association with GF was assessed (HR = 0.99, P = 0.40). This showed that there is no significant interaction between eGFR and LPBS.In contrast to these findings with respect to the functional read-out of LPBS, LDL-C levels were not associated with GF, neither in univariate nor in all computed multivariable Cox regression models (Table 4).Cox regression analyses were repeated with crude proteoglycan binding. The results were not substantially different with regard to the normalized marker of LPBS (supplemental Tables S1 and S2).As shown in Fig. 1, the association of LPBS with chronic GF was not different for males versus females (P for interaction = 0.12), subjects with high versus low age (P for interaction = 0.38), use of statins versus no use of statins (P for interaction = 0.67), high versus low eGFR (P for interaction = 0.17), or period of acute rejection versus no period of acute rejection (P for interaction = 0.45). However, for the association of LPBS with CVD mortality, there was an interaction with the use of calcineurin inhibitors versus no use of calcineurin inhibitors (P for interaction = 0.03), indicating that the relationship of LPBS with CVD risk is stronger in subjects that use calcineurin inhibitors.Fig. 1Hazard ratios for the association of LDL function (LPBS) with incident graft failure, by several participant level characteristics. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LPBS, lipoprotein-proteoglycan binding susceptibility.
DiscussionThe results of this study demonstrate that beyond the static measurement of circulating LDL-C levels, functional metrics determining lipoprotein retention to proteoglycans such as LPBS can provide useful clinical information. Specifically, we show that in RTRs, LPBS was prospectively associated with chronic GF, a manifestation of de novo atherosclerosis, but not with CVD death, largely a consequence of preexisting, complex atherosclerotic lesions. We interpret these findings as being consistent with the response-to-retention hypothesis of atherosclerotic lesion formation (10Tabas I. Williams K.J. Borén J. Subendothelial lipoprotein retention as the initiating process in atherosclerosis: update and therapeutic implications.
Comments (0)