Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (Mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North America. 1967;47(6):1345–51.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Haddad A, et al. The IFSO worldwide one anastomosis gastric bypass survey: techniques and outcomes? Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1411–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robert M, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(4):267–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Luca M, et al. IFSO update position statement on one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3251–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burton PR, Brown WA. The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction. Int J Obes. 2011;35(S3):S26–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Benavoli D, et al. Banded sleeve gastrectomy improves weight loss compared to nonbanded sleeve: midterm results from a prospective randomized study. J Obesity. 2020;2020(2020):1–7.

Google Scholar 

Clarke MG, et al. Laparoscopic silastic ring mini-gastric bypass: a single centre experience. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1852–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sheikh L, Pearless LA, Booth MWC. Laparoscopic silastic ring mini-gastric bypass (SR-MGBP): up to 11-year results from a single centre. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2229–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology. 1932.

Visick AH. A study of the failures after gastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1948;3(5):266–84.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salminen P, et al. IFSO consensus on definitions and clinical practice guidelines for obesity management-an international Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):30–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riddle MC, et al. Consensus report: definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(10):2438–44.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salminen P, et al. IFSO consensus on definitions and clinical practice guidelines for obesity management—an international Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):30–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kermansaravi M, et al. Efficacy of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obes Surg. 2024;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07564-z.

Pullman JS, Plank LD, Nisbet S, Murphy R, Booth MW. Seven-year results of a randomized trial comparing banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes and weight loss. Obes Surg. 2023;33(7):1989–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller KA, et al. 5-year results of banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a pilot study in super-obese patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(11):4307–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campanelli M, et al. Laparoscopic banded one anastomosis gastric bypass: a single-center series. J Obes. 2022;2022:4942052–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee W-J, et al. Laparoscopic roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity : a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):2721–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aleman R, et al. Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(Suppl 1):S7–S7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Parmar C, Pouwels S. Oesophageal and gastric cancer after bariatric surgery: an up-to-date systematic scoping review of literature of 324 cases. Obes Surg. 2022;32(12):3854–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahawar KK, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Min Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahuja A, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramos AC, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) consensus conference statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Slagter N, et al. Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial. British J Surg. 2024;111(9):znae219. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae219.

Article  Google Scholar 

Salman MA, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb (BPL) versus a 200-cm BPL, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1846–56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taha O, et al. Outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass in 472 diabetic patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2802–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses—first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1430–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chevallier JM, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (Omega Loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hussain A, et al. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group. Int J Surg. 2019;69:13–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Almuhanna M, et al. Twenty years’ experience of laparoscopic 1-anastomosis gastric bypass: surgical risk and long-term results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(5):968–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jedamzik J, et al. Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why—a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(2):225–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cazzo E, et al. Weight loss and vomiting 1 year after banded versus non-banded one anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1719–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Quint E, et al. Banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass (BOAGB) for patients living with obesity and extreme obesity: a single institution’s experience. Obes Surg. 2024;34(5):1756–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elhoofy A, Nagy M, Elghandour AM. Banded one anastomosis gastric bypass versus non-banded one anastomosis gastric bypass: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Ain Shams J Surg. 2024;17(4):349–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bessler MMD, et al. Prospective randomized trial of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass for the super obese: early results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):480–4.