Abernathy, W. B. (2008). Implications and applications of a behavior systems perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060802100980

Article  Google Scholar 

Abreu-Rodrigues, J., Natalino, P. C., & Aló, R. M. (2002). Instruções e iniqüidade de reforços: efeitos sobre o comportamento competitivo [Instructions and inequity of reinforcements: effects on competitive behavior]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 18, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722002000100010

Agbota, T. K., Sandaker, I., de Carvalho, L. C., & Couto, K. (2017). Behavioral and cultural accounts of corruption in the interface between public officer and client. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 13(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v13i1.5261

Agbota, T. K., Sandaker, I., & Ree, G. (2015). Verbal operants of corruption: A study of avoidance in corruption behavior. Behavior & Social Issues, 24, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v24i0.5864

Article  Google Scholar 

Alavosius, M. P., & Houmanfar, R. A. (2022). High-reliability organizations. A technical context to coordinate behaviors. In R. A. Houmanfar, M. Fryling & M. P. Alavosius (Eds.), Applied Behavioral Sciences in Organizations (pp. 275–289). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198949-13

Almeida, M., Caldas, L. F., & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2023).Cooperação em Análise do Comportamento: Conceitos e procedimentos [Cooperation in Behavior Analysis: Concepts and procedures]. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 24, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v24i1.1764

Andery, M. A. P. A. (2010). Especificidades e implicações da interpretação da linguagem como comportamento verbal [Specificities and implications of interpreting language as verbal behavior]. In E. Z. Tourinho & S. V. Luna (Eds.), Análise do comportamento: Investigações históricas, conceituais e aplicadas  (pp. 61–99). Roca.

Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (2001). Harnessing complexity. Basic Books.

Azfar, O., Lee, Y., & Swamy, A. (2001). The causes and consequences of corruption. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 573(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162015730010

Article  Google Scholar 

Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Balcazar, F. E., Shupert, M. K., Daniels, A. C., Mawhinney, T. C., & Hopkins, B. L. (1989). An objective review and analysis of ten years of publication in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 10(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v10n01_02

Article  Google Scholar 

Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1985). A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(314), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v07n03_05

Article  Google Scholar 

Bento, F. (2023, August 18). An introduction to complexity: The concepts of emergence, self-organization and networks. [Lecture Recording]. Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Bento, F., Tagliabue, M., & Sandaker, I. (2020). Complex systems and social behavior: Bridging social networks and behavior analysis. In T. M. Cihon & M. A. Mattaini (Eds.), Behavior science perspectives on culture and community (pp. 67–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_4

Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and exsmokers. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00005490

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bohr, N. (n.d.). The opposite of a correct statement is an incorrect statement, but the opposite of a profound truth is another profound truth.

Brethower, D. M. (1979, June). The total performance system: Applications to classrooms and other organizations [Paper presentation]. Association for Behavior Analysis International Convention, Dearborn, MI.

Brethower, D. M. (2001). A systemic view of enterprise: Adding value to performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 20(3/4), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v20n03_06

Article  Google Scholar 

Brethower, D. M. (2004). Understanding behavior of organizations to improve behavior in organizations. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/h010002

Article  Google Scholar 

Bueno, N. P. (2009). Corrupção: teoria, evidências empíricas e sugestões de medidas para reduzir seus níveis no Brasil-uma análise institucional. Revista da CGU, 4(6), 71–84.

Google Scholar 

Carvalho Neto, M. B. D., Costa, J. R. D., Barros, R. D. S., Farias, D. C. D., & Rico, V. V. (2013). Discriminação com três diferentes contingências em SA: Extinção, reforçamento e punição, extinção e punição. Interaçao Psicol, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v17i2.26176

de Carvalho, L. C., Couto, K. C., Gois, N. D. S., Sandaker, I., & Todorov, J. C. (2017). Evaluating effects of cultural consequences on the variability of interlocking behavioral contingencies and their aggregate products. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 18(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2016.1231003

Article  Google Scholar 

Carrara, K. & Fernandes, D. M. (2018). Corrupção e seleção por consequências: uma análise comportamental. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3423

Carson, L. D., & Prado, M. M. (2016). Using institutional multiplicity to address corruption as a collective action problem: Lessons from the Brazilian case. Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 62, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.009

Article  Google Scholar 

Cavalheiro, M. C. (2014). The effect of instruction manipulation and the current reinforcement program on behavioral change. Master’s dissertation, State University of Londrina, Center of Biological Sciences, Graduate Program in Behavior Analysis.

CFC. (2023). CFC e CGU ganham o 1º lugar do Prêmio da Rede Governança Brasil. Retrieved March 10, 2023 from https://cfc.org.br/noticias/cfc-e-cgu-ganham-o-1o-lugar-do-premio-da-rede-governanca-brasil/#:~:text=CFC%20e%20CGU%20ganham%20o%201%C2%BA%20lugar%20do%20Pr%C3%AAmio%20da%20Rede%20Governan%C3%A7a%20Brasil,-Home&text=O%20incentivo%20%C3%A0%20governan%C3%A7a%20p%C3%BAblica,Rede%20Governan%C3%A7a%20Brasil%20(RGB)

Cihon, T. M., Borba, A., Lopez, C. R., Kazaoka, K., & Carvalho, L. C. (2020). Experimental analysis in culturo-behavior Science: The search for basic processes. In T. M. Cihon & M. A. Mattaini (Eds.), Behavior science perspectives on culture and community (pp. 199–150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_6

Davis, K. E. (2021). Anti-corruption law and systemic corruption: The role of direct responses. Revista Direito GV, 17, e2129. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202129

Diener, L. H., McGee, H., & M., & Miguel, C. F. (2009). An integrated approach for conducting a behavioral systems analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060902874534

Article  Google Scholar 

Farias, F. A., & Martins, M. D. (2007). O conceito de pobreza do Banco Mundial [The World Bank’s concept of poverty]. Tensões mundiais, 3(5), 202–219.

Google Scholar 

Ferreira, A. L., Escobal, G., & Goyos, C. (2021). Distribuição de rendimentos no Jogo dos Bens Públicos: Um análogo experimental de corrupção [Income distribution in the Public Goods Game: An experimental analogue of corruption]. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v23i1.1466

Gailmard, S. (2014). Accountability and principal–agent theory. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 90–105 ). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0016

Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393175

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., Todorov, J. C., Tourinho, E. Z., & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 25(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634

Article  Google Scholar 

Gomes, C. T. (2018). Rule-governed behavior and relational responding: An experimental analysis. Master’s thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.  

Government of Brazil. (2022). Dados abertos: Banco Mundial disponibiliza microdados da pesquisa sobre ética e corrupção no serviço público federal [Open data: World Bank releases microdata from the survey on ethics and corruption in the federal public service]. Retrieved on: March 1, 2023 from https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2022/03/dados-abertos-banco-mundial-disponibiliza-microdados-da-pesquisa-sobre-etica-e-corrupcao-no-servico-publico-federal

Government of Brazil. (2023). Relatório Banco Mundial Validação CGU IACM-nível 2.pdf [World Bank Report CGU Validation IACM-level 2]. Retrieved on: February 21, 2023, from: https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2022/11/cgu-recebe-certificacao-no-nivel-2-do-modelo-ia-cm-pelo-banco-mundial/relatorio-banco-mundial-validacao-cgu-iacm-nivel-2.pdf/view

Gwin, C. (1997). US relations with the World Bank, 1945–1992. Brookings Institution., 2, 195–274.

Google Scholar 

Herbst, S. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). Psychological approaches to values in organizations and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060802714210

Article  Google Scholar 

Hora, K. L., & Sampaio, A. A. S. (2019). Units of analysis for corruption experiments: Operant, culturobehavioral lineage, culturant, and macrobehavior. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(4), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00225-y

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Houmanfar, R. A., Ardila Sánchez, J. G., & Alavosius, M. P. (2020). Role of cultural milieu in cultural change: Mediating factor in points of contact. In T. M. Cihon & M. A. Mattaini (Eds.), Behavior science perspectives on culture and community (pp. 151–170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_7

Hunziker, M. H. L. (2017). Dogmas sobre o controle aversivo [Dogmas about aversive control]. Acta Comportamentalia: Revista Latina de Análisis de Comportamiento, 25(1), 85–100.

Article  Google Scholar 

Krispin, J. (2017). Positive feedback loops of metacontingencies: A new conceptualization of cultural-level selection. Behavior & Social Issues, 26, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.7397

Article  Google Scholar 

Krispin, J. (2019). Culturo-behavioral hypercycles and the metacontingency: Incorporating self-organizing dynamics into an expanded model of cultural change. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(2), 869–887. /https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00212-3

Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management & Organization Review, 1(1), 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00006.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Machado, M. R. (2020). Independência como indiferença: A face jurídica da multiplicidade institucional em casos de corrupção. Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade, 55, 257–295.

Machado, M. R., & Paschoal, B. (2016). Monitorar, investigar, responsabilizar e sancionar: a multiplicidade institucional em casos de corrupção. Novos estudos CEBRAP, 35, 11–36 .https://doi.org/10.25091/S0101-3300201600010001

Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.11.2.139

Article  Google Scholar 

Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change. Context Press.

Malott, M. E. (2022). Paradox of organizational change: A selectionist approach to improving complex systems. In R. A. Houmanfar, M. Fryling, & M. P. Alavosius (Eds.), Applied behavior science in organizations: Consilience of historical and emerging trends in organizational behavior management (pp. 129–160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198949-6

Mariotto, F. L. (1991). O conceito de competitividade da empresa: uma análise crítica. Revista de administração de Empresas, 31, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901991000200004

Article  Google Scholar 

McGee, H. M., & Crowley-Koch, B. J. (2021). Performance assessment of organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 41(3), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.1909687

Article  Google Scholar 

Mitchell, R. B. (2014). Compliance theory: An overview 1. In J. Werksman, J. Cameron, & P. Roderick (Eds.), Improving compliance with international environmental law (pp. 3–28). Routledge.

Google Scholar 

Peixoto, J. (2009). Public sector reform in Brazil: An assessment of the CGU’s control activities. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(10), 844–867.

Google Scholar 

Prado, M. M., Carson, L., & Correa, I. (2016). The Brazilian Clean Company Act: Using institutional multiplicity for effective punishment. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 53, 107.

Article  Google Scholar 

Prado, M. M., & Cornelius, E. (2020). Multiplicidade institucional e a luta contra a corrupção: Uma agenda de pesquisa para a rede de accountability brasileira [Institutional multiplicity and the fight against corruption: A research agenda for the Brazilian accountability network]. Revista Direito GV, 16(3), e1974. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172201974

Queiroz, J. W. (2019). Corrupção: O Mal do Século: Entender para vencer o maior crime contra a sociedade [Corruption: The Evil of the Century: Understanding to overcome the greatest crime against society]. Alta Books.

Ribeiro, D. (1995/2022). The Brazilian people: The formation and the meaning of Brazil (Original work published 1995). Global.

Sandaker, I. (2006). How should behavior analysis interact effectively with the Social Sciences? Behavior & Social Issues, 15, 81–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sandaker, I. (2009). A selectionist perspective on systemic and behavioral change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29