Citra Kusumasari, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaFollow
Takashi Hatayama, Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, JapanFollow
Junji Tagami, Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, JapanFollow
Yasushi Shimada Prof., Tokyo Medical and Dental UniversityFollow
The long-term clinical performance of restoration in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) is an essential yet complicated strategy to achieve it. A resin-build-up tooth with higher elastic moduli is a minimally invasive strategy to decrease the risk of catastrophic root fracture. Additionally, intracanal resin composite anchorage simplifies the restorative procedure and increases the bonding. Objective: This case report describes a resin-build-up tooth restoration using the direct monoblock concept to replace a failed metal post and core and porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crown on the maxillary right central incisor. Case report: A 50-year-old man attended a dental university hospital with a chief complaint about the repeated detachment of the old resin-veneered crown along with the metal post on his maxillary right central incisor. He has been using that aged restoration for five years. The measurement of crown preparation in thickness was 2 mm, core length was 9 mm, post length was 7 mm, remaining gutta-percha was 5 mm, and the length from the end of gutta-percha to the apex was 1 mm. A Direct monoblock restoration using flowable and packable resin composite with universal adhesive was chosen to save time and to achieve long-term bonded restoration. Conclusion: Endodontically treated teeth on the maxillary incisor were successfully restored using the resin-build-up direct monoblock concept. The adhesive intracanal resin composite anchorage to a depth of 7 mm using a flowable resin composite replaced the post for ETT with favorable results. Moreover, the four-year follow-up of the clinical examination and evaluation showed good results.
References1. Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, Ferrari P, Austin R, Bhuva B. Present status and future directions: The restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2022; 55 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1059-84.
2. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: A hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007; 33(4):391-8.
3. Chouhan B, Chaudhary D, Matani P, Mathew RR. Monoblocks in root canals–A real or theoretical goal. Chron Dent Res. 2019; 8(1):8-12.
4. Chiba A, Hatayama T, Kainose K, Nakajima M, Pashley DH, Wakabayashi N, Tagami J. The influence of elastic moduli of core materials on shear stress distributions at the adhesive interface in resin built-up teeth. Dent Mater J. 2017; 36(1):95- 102.
5. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effects of C-factor and resin volume on the bonding to root canal with and without fibre post insertion. J Dent. 2011; 39(6):422-9.
6. Fokkinga WA, Le Bell AM, Kreulen CM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Int Endod J. 2005; 38(4):230-7.
7. Nakajima M, Kanno T, Komada W, Miura H, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of bonded area and/ or fiber post placement on the fracture strengths of resin-core reconstructions for pulpless teeth. Am J Dent. 2010; 23(6):300-4.
8. Kumagae N, Komada W, Fukui Y, Okada D, Takahashi H, Yoshida K, Miura H. Influence of the flexural modulus of prefabricated and experimental posts on the fracture strength and failure mode of composite resin cores. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31(1):113-9.
9. Krastl G, Izquierdo A, Büttel L, Zitzmann NU, Schmitter M, Weiger R. Does an intracanal composite anchorage replace posts? Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18(1):147-53.
10. Kusumasari C, Hatayama T, Shimada Y. Replacement of two failed indirect restorations with direct bonded restorations using minimally invasive strategy. J Dent Indones. 2021 ;28(3):198- 204.
11. Mahalaxmi S. Minimally invasive endodontics and endo-endorestorative–prosthodontic continuum: the right balance? J Oper Dent Endod. 2019; 4(1):42-53.
12. Mannocci F, Cowie J. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Br Dent J. 2014 Mar;216(6):341-6.
13. Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32(suppl 1):e74.
14. Magne P, Lazari PC, Carvalho MA, Johnson T, Del Bel Cury AA. Ferrule-effect dominates over use of a fiber post when restoring endodontically treated incisors: An in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2017; 42(4):396-406.
15. Kusumasari C, Margono A, Aditya DR, Abdou A. Effect of etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes in universal adhesives on push-out bond strength of fiber post. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022; 14(8):e661-8.
16. Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of the elastic modulus of endodontic posts on static load failure. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(5):458-68.
17. Hosaka K, Yonekura K, Taguchi K, Tichy A, Kuno Y, Nagano D, Araoka D, Hatayama T, Sato K, Takahashi M, Nishitani Y, Ikeda M, Nakajima M, Tagami J. The influence of a touch-cure system on the micro-tensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to root canal dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent. 2019; 62(1):39-46.
18. de Kuijper M, Gresnigt M, van den Houten M, Haumahu D, Schepke U, Cune MS. Fracture strength of various types of large direct composite and indirect glass ceramic restorations. Oper Dent. 2019; 44(4):433-42.
19. Kusumasari C, Hayashi M, Shimada Y. Uncut enamel for optimizing bonded composite restoration on multiple diastema closure cases. J Dent Indones. 2022 ;29(2):140-6.
20. Magne P, Belser U. Biomimetic restorative dentistry. Batavia, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2021.
21. Kusumasari C, Aprillia I, Wijayanti W, Abdou A. Survey of adhesive systems knowledge among conservative dentistry specialist dentist in Indonesia. Madj Persat Dokt Gigi Indones. 2023; 6(2):75-85.
22. Dwiandhany WS, Abdou A, Tichy A, Yonekura K, Ikeda M, Hosaka K, Tagami J, Nakajima M. Additive effects of touch-activated polymerization and extended irradiation time on bonding of lightactivated adhesives to root canal dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 127(5):750-8.
23. Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, Hickel R, Meyer-Lueckel H, Gurgan S, Pallesen U, Shearer AC, Tarle Z, Cotti E, Vanherle G, Opdam N. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: academy of operative dentistry European section. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(S7):S48-57.
Comments (0)