Abstract

Background Given the potential benefits of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) in perioperative care and the high prevalence of their use alongside conventional treatments, understanding perceptions of CAIM during surgery is important.

Methods A survey was conducted among authors who published in surgery journals. 40,074 clinicians and researchers were invited to participate. The survey included questions on demographics and CAIM perceptions.

Results The survey received 599 responses, with most identifying as both researchers and clinicians (n=331, 55.3%). Mind-body therapies (n=212, 47.1%) were considered the most promising CAIM areas for surgery. Most respondents believed CAIM therapies are safe (n=184, 46.2%) but were uncertain about their effectiveness (n=153, 38.6% disagreed and n=169, 42.7% were neutral). Many agreed on the value of CAIM research (n=310, 77.9%), increased funding (n=224, 55.9%), and clinician training through formal (n=215, 52.9%) and supplementary (n=246, 61.8%) education.

Conclusions Surgery clinicians and researchers show strong interest in more CAIM education and research. This study’s findings can guide the development of resources and training programs to improve CAIM knowledge and perceptions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/538AH

Funding Statement

This study was unfunded.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study received approval from the University Tubingen Research Ethics board (REB Number: 389/2023BO2).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

List of AbbreviationsCAIMcomplementary, alternative, and integrative medicineCHERRIESChecklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-SurveysDOIdigital object identifierMEDLINEMedical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnlineNLMNational Library of MedicineOSFOpen Science FrameworkPMIDPubMed identifierREBResearch Ethics BoardSTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology