Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diagnostiek bij angina pectoris. 2021. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/diagnostiek_bij_angina_pectoris_ap/startpagina_-_diagnostiek_bij_angina_pectoris_ap.html.

van den Boogert TPW, Claessen B, Boekholdt SM, et al. The impact and challenges of implementing CTCA according to the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes: a survey and projection of CTCA services in the Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2021;12:186.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS 2.0—2022 coronary artery disease—reporting and data system. An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed Tomography (SCCT), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American college of radiology (ACR) and the north america society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI). J Am Coll Radiol. 2022;19:1185–212.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foldyna B, Szilveszter B, Scholtz JE, et al. CAD-RADS—a new clinical decision support tool for coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1365–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. Coronary artery disease—reporting and data system (CAD-RADS): an expert consensus document of SCCT, ACR and NASCI: endorsed by the ACC. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1099–113.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS 2.0—2022 coronary artery disease—reporting and data system an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed Tomography (SCCT), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American college of radiology (ACR) and the north america society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI). Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2022;4:e220183.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leipsic J, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U, Vorpahl M, et al. The napkin-ring sign: CT signature of high-risk coronary plaques? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:440–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Driessen RS, et al. Effect of plaque burden and morphology on myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:499–509.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mortensen MB, et al. Impact of plaque burden versus stenosis on Ischemic events in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2803–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hadamitzky M, et al. Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:468–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Celeng C, et al. Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1316–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams MC, Moss A, Dweck M, et al. Standardized reporting systems for computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: a real-world validation of CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS in patients with stable chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14:3–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szilveszter B, et al. CAD-RADS may underestimate coronary plaque progression as detected by serial CT angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23:1530–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Budoff M, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CTA in stable chest pain: CAD-RADS, CAC, and cardiovascular events in PROMISE. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:1534–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang HJ, Lin FY, Lee SE, et al. Coronary atherosclerotic precursors of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2511–22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 1988;78:1157–66.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee JW, Kim JY, Han K, et al. Coronary CT angiography CAD-RADS versus coronary artery calcium score in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2021;301:81–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nerlekar N, et al. Computed tomographic coronary angiography-derived plaque characteristics predict major adverse cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e6973.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maroules CD, Hamilton-Craig C, Branch K, et al. Coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS(TM)): inter-observer agreement for assessment categories and modifiers. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12:125–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ippolito D, Talei Franzesi C, Cangiotti C, et al. Inter-observer agreement and image quality of model-based algorithm applied to the coronary artery disease-reporting and data system score. Insights Imaging. 2022;13:176.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4:65–93.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Basha MAA, et al. The validity and applicability of CAD-RADS in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:117.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hamilton MCK, Charters PFP, Lyen S, et al. Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) has no additional clinical impact over the anatomical coronary artery disease—reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) in real-world elective healthcare of coronary artery disease. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:883–90.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coronaire CT-scans: uniformering van voorbereiding tot verslaglegging. 2023. https://radiologen.nl/sites/default/files/Kwaliteit/coronaire_ct-scans_uniformering_van_voorbereiding_tot_verslaglegging_def_170323.pdf.

Hull RA et al. Adoption of coronary artery disease—reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) and observed impact on medical therapy and systolic blood pressure control. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14:421–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams MC, Earls JP, Hecht H. Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaque, recent progress and current limitations. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16:124–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nurmohamed NS, Bom MJ, Jukema RA, et al. AI-guided quantitative plaque staging predicts long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients at risk for atherosclerotic CVD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;17:269–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choi AD, Marques H, Kumar V, et al. CT evaluation by artificial intelligence for atherosclerosis, stenosis and vascular morphology (CLARIFY): a multi-center, international study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15:470–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baessler B, Gotz M, Antoniades C, et al. Artificial intelligence in coronary computed tomography angiography: demands and solutions from a clinical perspective. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1120361.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Halfmann MC, et al. Ultrahigh-spatial-resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography of coronary artery disease for stenosis assessment. Radiology. 2024;310:e231956.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar