Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. “Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion”, Spine. J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2006;6(4):435–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Choi J-Y, Park S-M, Kim H-J, Yeom JS. Recent Updates on Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications. Asian Spine J. 2022;16(6):1013–21. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0436.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

V. Singh et al. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With rhBMP-2 can Achieve High Fusion Rates in Adult Spine Deformity Surgeries. Glob. Spine J 2022;21925682221103512. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221103512.

Berjano P, et al. “Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2015;243:369–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3929-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodgers WB, Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA. Grade 2 spondylolisthesis at L4–5 treated by XLIF: safety and midterm results in the ‘worst case scenario.’ ScientificWorldJ. 2012;2012: 356712. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/356712.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Manzur MK, et al. Fusion rate for stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2020;20(11):1816–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.006.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cheng H, et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2018;229:134–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, Turner JD, Smith W, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(6):104–104. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.03.24.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hijji FY, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates. Spine J. 2017;17(10):1412–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alluri R, et al. Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Neurospine. 2021;18(3):430–6. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142440.220.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pimenta L, Taylor WR, Stone LE, Wali AR, Santiago-Dieppa DR. Prone Transpsoas Technique for Simultaneous Single-Position Access to the Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Spine. Oper Neurosurg Hagerstown Md. 2020;20(1):E5–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa328.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gandhi SD, Liu DS, Sheha ED, Colman MW. Prone transpsoas lumbar corpectomy: simultaneous posterior and lateral lumbar access for difficult clinical scenarios. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(3):284–91. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.12.SPINE201913.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith TG, et al. Initial multi-centre clinical experience with prone transpsoas lateral interbody fusion: Feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and lessons learned. North Am Spine Soc J. 2021;6: 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100056.

Article  Google Scholar 

Martirosyan NL, Uribe JS, Randolph BM, Buchanan RI. Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Case Report and Technical Note. World Neurosurg. 2020;144:170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.172.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dodo Y, et al. The anatomical positioning change of retroperitoneal organs in prone and lateral position: an assessment for single-prone position lateral lumbar surgery. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(6):2003–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07738-w.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farber SH, et al. Complications associated with single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;1(aop):1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.4.SPINE221180.

Article  Google Scholar 

S Mar et al. Pcompa. Oper Neurosurg Hagerstown Md, 2022;23(5). https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000368.

Wellington IJ, et al. Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique. Int J Spine Surg. 2023;17(1):112–21. https://doi.org/10.14444/8390.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Diaz-Aguilar L, et al. Radiographic alignment outcomes after the single-position prone transpsoas approach: a multi-institutional retrospective review of 363 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22603.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soliman MAR, et al. Comparison of prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: A retrospective radiographic propensity score-matched analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;213:107105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107105.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soliman MAR, et al. Complications of the Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery Publish Ahead of Print, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002555.

Morgan CD, et al. Outpatient outcomes of patients with femoral nerve neurapraxia after prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion at L4–5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37(1):92–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.11.SPINE211289.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel A, Rogers M, Michna R. A retrospective review of single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion cases: early learning curve and perioperative outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(6):1992–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07689-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckland AJ, Proctor D, Thomas JA, Protopsaltis TS, Ashayeri K, Braly BA. Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Increases Operative Efficiency and Maintains Safety in Revision Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004699.

Lamartina C, Berjano P. Prone single-position extreme lateral interbody fusion (Pro-XLIF): preliminary results. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06303-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soliman MAR, Khan A, Pollina J. Comparison of Prone Transpsoas and Standard Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Retrospective Radiographic Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;157:e11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.097.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Walker CT, Farber SH, Gandhi S, Godzik J, Turner JD, Uribe JS. Single-Position Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion Improves Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:e786–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.128.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amaral R, et al. “Comparison of segmental lordosis gain of prone transpsoas (PTP) vs. lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04821-1.

Smith TG, Pollina J, Joseph SA, Howell KM. Effects of Surgical Positioning on L4–L5 Accessibility and Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Prone and Lateral Decubitus in Asymptomatic Adults. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:e705–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.113.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tohmeh A, Somers C, Howell K. Saphenous somatosensory-evoked potentials monitoring of femoral nerve health during prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(7):1658–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07224-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salmons HI, Baird MD, Dearden ME, Wagner SC, Sebastian AS. Prone Versus Lateral Decubitus Positioning for Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2022;35(9):351. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001293.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Godzik J, et al. Single-position prone lateral approach: cadaveric feasibility study and early clinical experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(3):E15. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20359.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckland AJ, et al. Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion. Spine J. 2021;21(5):810–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar