Baker, J. (2021, July 7). The 2021 direct support professional (DSP) survey report. Relias. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.relias.com/blog/direct-support-professional-dsp-survey-report
Cook, T., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Performance feedback and probabilistic bonus contingencies among employees in a human service organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 25, 45–63.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fienup, D. M., Luiselli, J. K., Joy, M., Smyth, D., & Stein, R. (2013). Functional assessment and intervention for organizational behavior change: improving the timeliness of staff meetings at a human services organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33, 252–264.
Gil, P. J., & Carter, S. L. (2016). Graphic feedback, performance feedback, and goal setting increased staff compliance with a data collection task at a large residential facility. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36, 56–70.
Guercio, J. M., & Dixon, M. R. (2011). The observer effect and its impact on staff behavior in an acquired brain injury neurobehavioral treatment setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31(1), 43–54.
Guercio, J. M., & Hunyadi, S. (2022). Using the performance diagnostic checklist-human services (PDC-HS) to enhance data collection procedures in residential treatment settings for clients with significant behavioral challenges. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 43(4), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2022.2159611
Guercio, J. M., Dixon, M. R., Soldner, J., Shoemaker, Z., Zlomke, K., Root, S., & Small, S. (2005). Enhancing staff performance measures in an acquired brain injury setting: Combating the habituation to organizational behavioral interventions. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 91–99.
Jerome, J., Kaplan, H., & Sturmey, P. (2014). The effects of in-service training alone and in-service training with feedback on data collection accuracy for direct-care staff working with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 529–536.
Larson, S. A., Tolbize, M. S. A., Kim, O., & York, B. (2016). Direct support professional turnover costs in small group homes: A case study. University of Minnesota, Research and Training Center on Community Living. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311536964_Direct_Support_Professional_Turnover_Costs_in_Small_Group_Homes_A_Case_Study. Accessed 15 Jan 2024.
Morris, J., & Ellis, J. (1997). The effect of verbal and graphic feedback on the data-recording behavior of direct care trainers. Behavioral Interventions, 12, 77–104.
Miller, M., Carlson, J., & Sigurdsson, S. O. (2014). Improving treatment integrity in a human service setting using lottery-based incentives. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34, 29–38.
Miltenberger, R. G. (1997). Graphing and measuring change. In R. G. Miltenberger (Ed.), Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (pp. 49–53). Brooks/Cole.
Mowery, J. M., Miltenberger, R. G., & Weil, T. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of reactivity to supervisor presence on staff response to tactile prompts and self-monitoring in a group home setting. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 25, 21–35.
Mozingo, D. B., Smith, T., Riordan, M. R., Reiss, M. L., & Bailey, J. S. (2006). Enhancing frequency recording by developmental disabilities treatment staff. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 253–256.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vollmer, T. R., Sloman, K. N., & Pipkin, C. S. P. (2008). Practical implications of data reliability and treatment integrity monitoring. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 4–11.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wooderson, J. R., Cuskelly, M., & Meyer, K. A. (2014). A systematic review of interventions for improving the work performance of direct support staff. Research & Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 1(2), 160–173.
Comments (0)