American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 5th edn. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.

Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schilid HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesion? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moate PJ, Dougherty L, Schnall MD, Landis RJ, Boston RC. A modified logistic model to describe gadolinium kinetics in breast tumors. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:467–73.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1307–18.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007;244: 356–78.

King KF. Chapter 11.2, k-space, chapter 11.3, keyhole, BRISK, and TRICKS. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 378–93.

Zhou XJ. Chapter 11.5, two-dimensional acquisition. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 405–23.

King KF. Chapter 17.5, projection acquition. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 897–927.

Sekine T, Amano Y, Takagi R, Matsumura Y, Murai Y, Kumita S. Feasibility of 4D flow MR imaging of brain with either Cartesian y-z radial sampling or k-t SENSE: comparison with 4D flow MR imaging using SENSE. Magn Reason Med Sci. 2014;13:15–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT, Chandarana H, Kim S, Xu J, Axel L, Sodickson DK, Otazo R. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:707–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takatsu Y, Ueyama T, Iwasaki T, Asahara M, Honda M, Miyati T. Effects of k-space orders on the time-intensity curves in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast based on simulation study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;79:85–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takatsu Y, Ueyama T, Miyati T, Yamamura K. Simulation of the modulation transfer function dependent on the partial Fourier fraction in dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016;39:825–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

King KF, Chap 13.4, partial Fourier reconstruction. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 546–58.

Kazerooni AF, Nabil M, Khah HH, Parviz S, Gity M, Rad HS. A one-step biomarker quantification methodology for DCE-MRI of adnexal masses: capturing kinetic pattern from early to late enhancement. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1165–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

King KF. Chapter 13.2, k-space, gridding reconstruction. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 506–21.

Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L. Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology. 2019;292:520–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MathWorks Help Center. In: Evaluating goodness of fit. The MathWorks, Inc. 1994–2023. Accessed 25 Dec 2023.

King KF, Chap 13.1, Fourier reconstruction. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 491–505.

Dang Y, Guo L, Lv D, Wang X, Zhang J. Classification of breast lesions based on a dual S-shaped logistic model in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Sci China Life Sci. 2011;54:889–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar