Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists.

Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy

Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally.

Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation.

Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents.

Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development.

Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence.

Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools.

Key message –

Clinicians and researchers should examine and modify: fear of movement, Negative pain beliefs, Maladaptive/avoidance behaviors, catastrophisation and Anxiety (psychological constructs) and Quality of life, work related constructs, sleep quality, education health literacy and social interactions(psychoSOCIAL constructs) during clinical or research work.

Training needs to be developed to improve clinician confidence when assessing and treating psychological and psychoSOCIAL factors in patients with tendinopathy

Further work is needed to examine the barriers and facilitators to the use of appropriate validated psychological and psychoSOCIAL tools in clinical care.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was sought and granted from the University of Leicester Research Ethics Committee (31603-is489-ls:medicine).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors