Mortality with concurrent treatment with gabapentin and opioids among people with spine diagnoses in the U.S. Medicare population: a propensity-matched cohort study

Abstract

Importance Given the negative impact of opioid use on population health, prescriptions for alternative pain-relieving medications, including gabapentin, have increased. Concurrent gabapentin and opioid prescriptions are commonly reported in retrospective studies of opioid-related overdose deaths.

Objective To determine whether people who filled gabapentin and opioid prescriptions concurrently (“gabapentin + opioids”) had greater mortality than those who filled an active control medication (tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs] or duloxetine) and opioids concurrently (“TCAs/duloxetine + opioids”). We hypothesized that people treated with gabapentin + opioids would have higher mortality rates compared to people treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids.

Design Propensity score-matched cohort study with an incident user, active control design. The median (maximum) follow-up was 45 (1093) days.

Setting Population-based.

Participants Medicare beneficiaries with spine-related diagnoses 2017-2019. The primary analysis included those who concurrently (within 30 days) filled ≥1 incident gabapentin + ≥1 opioid or ≥1 incident TCA/duloxetine + ≥1 opioid.

Exposures People treated with gabapentin + opioids (n=67,133) were matched on demographic and clinical factors in a 1:1 ratio to people treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids (n=67,133).

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was mortality at any time. A secondary outcome was occurrence of a major medical complication at any time.

Results Among 134,266 participants (median age 73.4 years; 66.7% female), 2360 died before the end of follow-up. No difference in mortality was observed between groups (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for gabapentin + opioids was 0.98 (0.90, 1.06); p=0.63). However, people treated with gabapentin + opioids were at slightly increased risk of a major medical complication (1.02 (1.00, 1.04); p=0.03) compared to those treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids. Results were similar in analyses (a) restricted to ≤30-day follow-up and (b) that required ≥2 fills of each prescription.

Conclusions and Relevance When treating pain in older adults taking opioids, the addition of gabapentin did not increase mortality risk relative to addition of TCAs or duloxetine. However, providers should be cognizant of a small increased risk of major medical complications among opioid users initiating gabapentin compared to those initiating TCAs or duloxetine.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/9u6re/

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the University of Washington Clinical Learning, Evidence, And Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Administrative, Methodologic and Resource Cores and NIAMS/NIH grant P30AR072572. The funding source had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit this article for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Institutional Review Board at the University of Washington waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by the University of Washington Clinical Learning, Evidence, And Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Administrative, Methodologic and Resource Cores and NIAMS/NIH grant P30AR072572. The funding source had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit this article for publication.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Comments (0)

No login
gif