Kawka M, Fong Y, Gall TMH. Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2023 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Apr 6];37(9):6672. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37442833/. Accessed 14 Mar 2024
Moore LJ, Wilson MR, McGrath JS, Waine E, Masters RSW, Vine SJ (2015) Surgeons’ display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 29(9):2553–2560
Struk S, Qassemyar Q, Leymarie N, Honart J-F, Alkhashnam H, De Fremicourt K et al (2018) The ongoing emergence of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique 63(2):105–112
Dobbs TD, Cundy O, Samarendra H, Khan K, Whitaker IS (2017) A systematic review of the role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery—from inception to the future. Front Surg 15:4
Jimenez C, Stanton E, Sung C, Wong AK (2022) Does plastic surgery need a rewiring? A survey and systematic review on robotic-assisted surgery. JPRAS Open 33:76–91
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ 29:372
Microsoft Corporation (2018) Microsoft Excel [Internet]. Available from: https://office.microsoft.com/excel. Accessed 14 Mar 2024
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 28:l4898
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Munn Z, Barker T, Moola S, Tufanaru C, Stern C, McArthur A et al (2020) Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evidence Synthesis 18(10):2127–2133
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F (2017) Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (eds) Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017. Available from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/
Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 7.2.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2024. Available at revman.cochrane.org
Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee K, Han DH, Lee DW (2020) Axillary lymph node dissection using a robotic surgical system: initial experience. J Surg Oncol 122(6):1252–1256
Feng AL, Razavi CR, Lakshminarayanan P, Ashai Z, Olds K, Balicki M et al (2017) The robotic ENT microsurgery system: a novel robotic platform for microvascular surgery. Laryngoscope 127(11):2495–2500
van Mulken TJM, Schols RM, Qiu SS, Brouwers K, Hoekstra LT, Booi DI et al (2018) Robotic (super) microsurgery: feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions. J Surg Oncol 118(5):826–831
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malzone G, Menichini G, Innocenti M, Ballestín A (2023) Microsurgical robotic system enables the performance of microvascular anastomoses: a randomized in vivo preclinical trial. Sci Rep 13(1):14003
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ballestin A, Malzone G, Menichini G, Lucattelli E, Innocenti M, Ballestín A, et al (2022) New Robotic System with Wristed Microinstruments Allows Precise Reconstructive Microsurgery: Preclinical Study. Ann Surg Oncol 29(12):7859–7867
Zhu J-H, Deng J, Liu X-J, Wang J, Guo Y-X, Guo C-B (2016) Prospects of robot-assisted mandibular reconstruction with fibula flap: comparison with a computer-assisted navigation system and freehand technique. J Reconstr Microsurg 32(9):661–669
Manrique OJ, Bustos SS, Mohan AT, Nguyen M-D, Martinez-Jorge J, Forte AJ et al (2020) Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest for autologous breast reconstruction: a comparative feasibility study on a cadaveric model. J Reconstr Microsurg 36(05):362–368
Sánchez A, Rodríguez O, Jara G, Sánchez R, Vegas L, Rosciano J et al (2018) Robot-assisted surgery and incisional hernia: a comparative study of ergonomics in a training model. J Robot Surg 12(3):523–527
Chen MM, Orosco RK, Lim GC, Holsinger FC (2018) Improved transoral dissection of the tongue base with a next-generation robotic surgical system. Laryngoscope 128(1):78–83
Tay G, Tan H, Nguyen TK, Phee SJ, Iyer NG (2018) Use of the EndoMaster robot-assisted surgical system in transoral robotic surgery: A cadaveric study. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 14(4):e1930
Friedrich DT, Dürselen L, Mayer B, Hacker S, Schall F, Hahn J et al (2018) Features of haptic and tactile feedback in TORS-a comparison of available surgical systems. J Robot Surg 12(1):103–108
Leijte E, de Blaauw I, Rosman C, Botden SMBI (2020) Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks. BMC Surg 20(1):183
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Groote R, Puliatti S, Amato M, Mazzone E, Rosiello G, Farinha R, et al (2022) Proficiency-based progression training for robotic surgery skills training: a randomized clinical trial. Larcher A Decoene J, Tuyten T, D’Hondt M, Hubert N, Chatzopoulos C, De Troyer B UP, Group JE working group on robot-assisted surgery of the EA of U, the ERUS Education Working, editors. BJU Int 30(4):528–535
Liverneaux PA, Hendriks S, Selber JC, Parekattil SJ (2013) Robotically assisted microsurgery: development of basic skills course. Arch Plast Surg 40(04):320–326
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Perez M, Perrenot C, Tran N, Hossu G, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2013) Prior experience in micro-surgery may improve the surgeon’s performance in robotic surgical training. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9(3):351–358
Alrasheed T, Liu J, Hanasono MM, Butler CE, Selber JC (2014) Robotic Microsurgery: validating an assessment tool and plotting the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):794–803
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Selber J, Alrasheed T (2014) Robotic microsurgical training and evaluation. Semin Plast Surg 28(01):005–010
Willems JIP, Shin AM, Shin DM, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2016) A comparison of robotically assisted microsurgery versus manual microsurgery in challenging situations. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(4):1317–1324
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Clarke NS, Price J, Boyd T, Salizzoni S, Zehr KJ, Nieponice A et al (2018) Robotic-assisted microvascular surgery: skill acquisition in a rat model. J Robot Surg 12(2):331–336
van Mulken TJM, Boymans CAEM, Schols RM, Cau R, Schoenmakers FBF, Hoekstra LT et al (2018) Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(5):1367–1376
Yang M, Peng J, Wang X, Lei H, Li X, Yang K (2022) Reinforcing the effect of microsurgery practice during robotic suturing skill acquisition. Int J Medi Robot Comput Assist Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2350
Beier JP, Hackenberg S, Boos AM, Modabber A, Duong Dinh TA, Hölzle F (2023) First series of free flap reconstruction using a dedicated robotic system in a multidisciplinary microsurgical center. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 11(9):e5240
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Louis V, Chih-Sheng L, Chevallier D, Selber JC, Xavier F, Liverneaux PA (2018) A porcine model for robotic training harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique 63(2):113–116
Thomaier L, Orlando M, Abernethy M, Paka C, Chen CCG (2017) Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31(8):3279–3285
Orlando MS, Thomaier L, Abernethy MG, Chen CCG (2017) Retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills among medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31(8):3306–3312
Jacob MO, Karatassas A, Hewett P, Guirgis M, Hensman C, Catterwell R (2023) The use of a porcine model to teach advanced abdominal wall dissection techniques. Surg Endosc 37(12):9684–9689
Lee J, Park HS, Lee DW, Song SY, Yu J, Ryu JM et al (2021) From cadaveric and animal studies to the clinical reality of robotic mastectomy: a feasibility report of training program. Sci Rep 11(1):21032
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bur AM, Gomez ED, Newman JG, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Rassekh CH et al (2017) Evaluation of high-fidelity simulation as a training tool in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 127(12):2790–2795
Comments (0)