Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:153–160

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:199–207

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104:1443–1450

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268:731–739

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chong CC, Fuks D, Lee KF, Zhao JJ, Choi GH, Sucandy I et al (2022) Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 157:436–444

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, Gillespie TW, Weber SM, Abbott DE et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264:640–649

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sucandy I, Rayman S, Lai EC, Tang CN, Chong Y, Efanov M et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic left and extended left hepatectomy: an international multicenter study propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 29:8398–8406

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1918911

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khachfe HH, Nassour I, Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, Liu H et al (2022) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: increased adoption and improved outcomes—is laparoscopy still justified? Ann Surg

Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL et al (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watkins AA, Kent TS, Gooding WE, Boggi U, Chalikonda S, Kendrick ML et al (2018) Multicenter outcomes of robotic reconstruction during the early learning curve for minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20:155–165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt CR, Harris BR, Musgrove KA, Rao P, Marsh JW, Thomay AA et al (2021) Formal robotic training diminishes the learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: Implications for new programs in complex robotic surgery. J Surg Oncol 123:375–380

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, Miller J, Zureikat AH et al (2017) Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency. J Surg Educ 74:477–485

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, Chen Y, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ et al (2017) Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy biotissue curriculum has validity and improves technical performance for surgical oncology fellows. J Surg Educ 74:1057–1065

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Abbas AI, Wang C, Hamad AB, Knab LM, Rice MK, Moser AJ et al (2021) Mentorship and formal robotic proficiency skills curriculum improve subsequent generations’ learning curve for the robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 23:1849–1855

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, Al Abbas AI, Boone BA, Moser AJ et al (2021) 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg 273:966–972

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen JW, van Ramshorst TME, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U et al (2023) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: an international, retrospective. Cohort Study Ann Surg Oncol 30:3023–3032

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosen L, Jacobson N, Weinberg A, Ascher-Walsh C (2019) Resident simulation training improves operative time of the retropubic midurethral sling procedure for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 30:1359–1363

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Okamura A, Watanabe M, Fukudome I, Yamashita K, Yuda M, Hayami M et al (2018) Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes. Esophagus 15:115–121

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Traynor O, Neary PC (2014) Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre? Am J Surg 207:146–157

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang K, Hersh AM, Bhimreddy M, Weber-Levine C, Davidar AD, Menta AK et al (2023) Learning curves for robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: analysis of operative time for 234 cases. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 25:482–488

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stern N, Li Y, Wang PZ, Dave S (2022) A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency. J Pediatr Urol 18:822–829

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aboudou T, Li M, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Li Y, Feng L et al (2022) Laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 11

Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210 (discussion 210–1)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schneider EB, Canner JK, Gani F, Kim Y, Ejaz A, Spolverato G et al (2015) Early versus late hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 196:74–81

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nota CL, Zwart MJ, Fong Y, Hagendoorn J, Hogg ME, Koerkamp BG et al (2017) Developing a robotic pancreas program: the Dutch experience. J Vis Surg 3:106

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Wang H, Gomez HF, Sun CC et al (2007) The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery 141:694–701

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fisher WE, Hodges SE, Wu MF, Hilsenbeck SG, Brunicardi FC (2012) Assessment of the learning curve for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 203:684–690

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A et al (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–640

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doherty C, Nakoneshny SC, Harrop AR, Matthews TW, Schrag C, McKenzie DC et al (2012) A standardized operative team for major head and neck cancer ablation and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:82–88

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar