Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis: Time for a Paradigm Shift

  SFX Search  Buy Article Permissions and Reprints Abstract

Recent advances in genetics and imaging have ushered substantial breakthroughs in screening and diagnosis for chromosomal and structural abnormalities. Thus, it is imperative that health care providers caring for pregnant individuals should reexamine established practices in prenatal screening and diagnosis. In the past, screening for chromosomal abnormalities was based almost entirely on Down syndrome. Pregnant individuals aged > 35 years were considered at “high risk” or of “advanced maternal age” based on age alone; however, the advent of tests with high sensitivity for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities should lead to abandoning that concept, at least from the perspective of chromosomal abnormalities. Given that first-trimester and second-trimester screenings will fail to detect between 5 and 20% of Down syndrome, in most situations, noninvasive testing with cell-free DNA should be the first-line screen for Down syndrome. The fact that over 99% of fetuses with Down syndrome will be detected prenatally with cell-free DNA gives other fetal chromosomal and structural abnormalities increasing prominence. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) permits prenatal detection of several clinically important chromosomal aberrations that cannot be detected by karyotype and may exist in structurally normal fetuses with low-risk cell-free DNA screening. As such, CMA should be more readily conducted when invasive testing is performed, regardless of the presence of a structural abnormality. Isolated sonographic “soft markers” have no clinical significance in patients who have normal cell-free DNA screening, can cause unwarranted anxiety and a negative impact on pregnancy, and perhaps it is time to stop discussing them. Detailed first-trimester ultrasound allows early detection of several severe fetal anomalies and, therefore, in settings with adequately trained personnel and resources, should be used more frequently. This opinion traces the evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and advocates for a paradigm shift that aligns with recent developments in prenatal screening and diagnostic capabilities.

Key Points

Noninvasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA should be available to all pregnant individuals.

Chromosomal microarray should be available to all pregnant individuals undergoing amniocentesis.

Patients >35 years with low-risk screening are not at “high risk” for chromosomal abnormalities.

Keywords prenatal screening - prenatal diagnosis - chromosomal aberrations - chromosomal microarray - noninvasive prenatal screening - karyotype Summary

Recent advances in genetics and imaging require that health care providers involved in pregnancy care reevaluate current prenatal screening practices and adopt a paradigm shift.

Publication History

Received: 08 January 2024

Accepted: 17 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 April 2024

Article published online:
16 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif