Referencias bibliográficas

1. Weledji EP. An overview of gastroduodenal perforation. Front Surg. 2020;7:573901. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901 [ Links ]

2. Laila B, Vinciane L, Michael V, Patrick F, Awada A, Maria GG, et al. Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of SIRT-induced gastroduodenal ulcers: A systematic literature review. Surg Oncol. 2020;35:520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.10.014 [ Links ]

3. Shirazi M, Zaban MT, Gummadi S, Ghaemi M. Peptic ulcer perforation after cesarean section; case series and literature review. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00732-9 [ Links ]

4. Engemise S, Oshowo A, Kyei-Mensah A. Perforated duodenal ulcer in the puerperium. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(3):407- 10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0722-4 [ Links ]

5. Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 [ Links ]

6. Choi YS, Heo YS, Yi JW. Clinical characteristics of primary repair for perforated peptic ulcer: 10-year experience in a single center. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1790. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081790 [ Links ]

7. Bojanapu S, Malani RA, Ray S, Mangla V, Mehta N, Nundy S. Duodenal perforation: Outcomes after surgical management at a tertiary care centre - a retrospective cross-sectional study. Surg Res Pract. 2020;2020:8392716. doi: 10.1155/2020/8392716 [ Links ]

8. Jidha TD, Umer KM, Beressa G, Tolossa T. Perforated duodenal ulcer in the third trimester of pregnancy, with survival of both the mother and neonate, in Ethiopia: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2022;16(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03562-w [ Links ]

9. Dongo AE, Uhunmwagho O, Kesieme EB, Eluehike SU, Alufohai EF. A five-year review of perforated peptic ulcer disease in Irrua, Nigeria. Int Sch Res Notices. 2017;2017:8375398. doi: 10.1155/2017/8375398 [ Links ]

10. Ansari D, Torén W, Lindberg S, Pyrhönen HS, Andersson R. Diagnosis and management of duodenal perforations: a narrative review. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(8):939-44. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1647456 [ Links ]

11. Ali AM, Mohamed AN, Mohamed YG, Kelesoglu SI. Clinical presentation and surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer in a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia: a 5-year retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg. 2022;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00428-w [ Links ]

12. Malgras B, Placé V, Dohan A, Lo Dico R, Duron S, Soyer P, et al. Natural history of pneumoperitoneum after laparotomy: findings on multidetector-row computed tomography. World J Surg. 2017;41(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3648-1 [ Links ]

13. Häger RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Øian P, Henriksen T. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037 [ Links ]

14. Yang YJ, Bang CS, Shin SP, Park TY, Suk KT, Baik GH, et al. Clinical characteristics of peptic ulcer perforation in Korea. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(14):2566-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i14.2566 [ Links ]

15. Gupta S, Alawad AA, Dacosta K, Mahmoud A, Mohammed T. Operative versus non-operative management for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;82:104643. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104643 [ Links ]