Health Care Without Harm. Healthcare climate footprint report. 2019. https://noharmglobal.org/documents/health-care-climate-footprint-report. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Eckelman MJ, Sherman J (2016) Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLOS ONE 11:e0157014
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Picano E, Mangia C, D’Andrea AJ (2022) Climate change, carbon dioxide emissions, and medical imaging contribution. J Clin Med 12:215
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lojo-Lendoiro S, Rovira À, Morales Santos Á (2023) Green Radiology: how to develop sustainable radiology. Radiología (Engl Ed). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2023.06.007.Articleinpress
European Commission. Buying green! A handbook on environmental public procurement. European Commission. Luxembourg; Ed Publications Office of the European Union: 2016. Consulted: 25–05–2023 Available: Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf (europa.eu)
European Commission. EU GPP criteria for electrical and electronic equipment used in the health care sector. Luxemburgo; Ed Publicacions Office of the European Union: 2014. Consulted: 25–05–2023 Available: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/criteria/health/EN.pdf
Public Services and Procurement Canada. Green Procurement Plan—Part A: Checklist. Ed PSPC CA: 2019. Consulted: 25–05–2023 Available: https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/ae-gp/npaea-ngppa-eng.html
Liu B, Tong L, Liu Y, Guo Z (2022) Maintenance and management technology of medical imaging equipment based on deep learning. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 1:1–9
European Coordination Committee of the Radiological, Electromedical and Healthcare IT Industry (COCIR), Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems (JIRA), Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance United States (MITA. Green Paper on Good Refurbishment practice for medical imaging equipment. 12 April 2018. Consulted: 21–03–2023 Available:https://www.cocir.org/fileadmin/6.1_Initiatives_Refurbishment/Good_Refurbishment_Practice_V2.pdf
European Union. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionizing radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. OJEU no. 13, of January 17, 2014, pages 1 to 73.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for health care equipment donations. Genève; Ed WHO: March 2000. Consulted: 21–03–2023 Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70806/WHO_ARA_97.3_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Eckelman MJ, Huang K, Lagasse R, Senay E, Dubrow R, Sherman JD (2020) Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: an update. Health Aff (Millwood) 39:2071–2079
Marwick TH, Buonocore J (2011) Environmental impact of cardiac imaging tests for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart 97:1128–1131
Martin M, Mohnke A, Lewis GM, Dunnick NR, Keoleian G, Maturen KE (2018) Environmental impacts of abdominal imaging: a pilot investigation. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1385–1393
Martin MF, Maturen KE (2020) On green radiology. Acad Radiol 27:1601–1602
Heye T, Knoerl R, Wehrle T et al (2020) The energy consumption of radiology: energy- and cost-saving opportunities for CT and MRI operation. Radiology 295:593–605
Vosshenrich J, Breit HC, Bach M, Merkle EM (2022) Economic aspects of low-field magnetic resonance imaging : acquisition, installation, and maintenance costs of 0.55 T systems. Radiologe 62:400–404
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein JM (2023) Low-field MRI: clinical promise and challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 57:25–44
Heiss R, Nagel AM, Laun FB, Uder M, Bickelhaupt S (2021) Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: a new generation of breakthrough technology in clinical imaging. Invest Radiol 56:726–733
Woolen SA, Kim CJ, Hernandez AM et al (2023) Radiology environmental impact: what is known and how can we improve? Acad Radiol 30:625–630
Hainc N, Brantner P, Zaehringer C, Hohmann J (2020) “Green fingerprint” project: evaluation of the power consumption of reporting stations in a radiology department. Acad Radiol 27:1594–1600
Woolen SA, Becker AE, Martin AJ et al (2023) Ecodesign and operational strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of MRI for energy cost savings. Radiology 307:e230441
https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
D’Alessandro D, Tedesco P, Rebecchi A, Capolongo S (2016) Water use and water saving in Italian hospitals. A preliminary investigation. Ann Ist Super Sanita 52:56–62
Health Technical Memorandum 07–04: Water management and water efficiency—best practice advice for the healthcare sector (https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/water-management-and-water-efficiency-htm-07-04/ ). Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Jouhara H, Khordehgah N, Almahmoud S, Delpech B, Chauhan A, Tassou SA (2018) Waste heat recovery technologies and applications. Therm Sci Eng Prog 6:268–289
Hidalgo-Tobon SS (2010) Theory of gradient coil design methods for magnetic resonance imaging. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 36A:223–242
Stall NM, Kagoma YK, Bondy JN, Naudie D (2013) Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg 56:97–102
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hutchins DCJ, White SM (2009) Coming round to recycling. BMJ 338:b609
Sumner C, Ikuta I, Garg T et al (2023) Approaches to greening radiology. Acad Radiol 30:528–535
Chawla A, Chinchure D, Marchinkow LO, Munk PL, Peh WCG (2017) Greening the radiology department: not a big mountain to climb. CARJ 68:234–236
Brown M, Schoen JH, Gross J, Omary RA, Hanneman K (2023) Climate change and radiology: impetus for change and a toolkit for action. Radiology 307:e230229
Thomas A (2012) Medical imaging: why helium prevails. In: Nuttall WJ, Clarke RH, Glowacki BA (eds) The future of helium as a natural resource. Routledge, London, UK
Nuttall WJ, Clarke RH, Glowacki BA (2012) Resources: stop squandering helium. Nature 485:573–575
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mohr S, Ward J (2014) Helium production and possible projection. Minerals 4:130–144
Brünjes R, Hofmann T (2020) Anthropogenic gadolinium in freshwater and drinking water systems. Water Res 182:115966
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dekker HM, Stroomberg GJ, Prokop M (2022) Tackling the increasing contamination of the water supply by iodinated contrast media. Insights Imaging 13:30
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kovalova L, Siegrist H, Singer H, Wittmer A, McArdell CS (2012) Hospital wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor: performance and efficiency for organic micropollutant elimination. Environ Sci Technol 46:1536–1545
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sengar A, Vijayanandan A (2021) Comprehensive review on iodinated X-ray contrast media: complete fate, occurrence, and formation of disinfection byproducts. Sci Total Environ 769:144846
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jomaah R, Barrat JA, Tripier R et al (2023) Iodine footprint: moving towards environmental responsibility. J Neuroradiol 50:1–2
Moller P, Dulski P, Bau M, Knappe A, Pekdeger A, Sommer-von JC (2000) Anthropogenic gadolinium as a conservative tracer in hydrology. J Geochem Explor 69–70:409–414
Verplanck PL, Taylor HE, Nordstrom DK, Barber LB (2005) Aqueous stability of gadolinium in surface waters receiving sewage treatment plant effluent, Boulder Creek. Colorado Environ Sci Technol 39:6923–6929
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kulaksız S, Bau M (2007) Contrasting behaviour of anthropogenic gadolinium and natural rare earth elements in estuaries and the gadolinium input into the North Sea. Earth Planet Sci Lett 260:361–371
Pereto C, Lerat-Hardy A, Baudrimont M, Coynel A (2023) European fluxes of medical gadolinium to the ocean: a model based on healthcare databases. Envir International 173:107868
Chazot A, Barrat J-A, Gaha M, Jomaah R, Ognard J, Ben SD (2020) Brain MRI make up the bulk of the gadolinium footprint in medical imaging. J Neuroradiol 47:259–265
Balzer T. (2017) Presence of gadolinium (Gd) in the brain and body. Presentation to the Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee, FDA. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Rovira A, Doniselli FM, Auger C et al (2023) Use of gadolinium‑based contrast agents in multiple sclerosis: a review by the ESMRMB‑GREC and ESNR Multiple Sclerosis Working Group. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10151-y
Mallio CA, Radbruch A, Deike-Hofmann K et al (2023) Artificial Intelligence to reduce or eliminate the need for gadolinium-based contrast agent in brain and cardiac MRI: a literature review. Invest Radiol 58:746–753
Bendszus M, Roberts D, Kolumban B et al (2020) Dose finding study of gadopiclenol, a new macrocyclic contrast agent, in MRI of central nervous system. Invest Radiol 55:129–137
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Loevner LA, Kolumban B, Hutoczki G et al (2023) Efficacy and safety of gadopiclenol for contrast-enhanced MRI of the central nervous system: the PICTURE randomized clinical trial. Invest Radiol 58:307–313
留言 (0)