Easa HK, Mantiuk RK, Lim IS (2013) Evaluation of monocular depth cues on a high-dynamic-range display for visualization. ACM Trans Appl Percept 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504568

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdelrahman M, Belramman A, Salem R, Patel B (2018) Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: a randomized control study. Int J Surg 53:333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.080

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhattacharjee HK, Chaliyadan S, Mishra AK, Agarwal H, Suhani S, Joshi M, Parshad R (2021) Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study. Surg Endosc 35:5328–5337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07980-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhattacharjee HK, Agarwal H, Singla V, Chaliyadan S, Mishra AK, Suhani S, Joshi M, Parshad R (2022) Learning pattern of two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and ultra-high-definition endovision system on standardized phantom tasks: an Ex Vivo randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 32:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0530

Article  Google Scholar 

Pantalos G, Patsouras D, Spartalis E, Dimitroulis D, Tsourouflis G, Nikiteas N (2020) Three-dimensional Versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. In Vivo 34:11–21. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11740

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harada H, Kanaji S, Nishi M, Otake Y, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Sumi Y, Nakamura T, Suzuki S, Sato Y, Kakeji Y (2018) The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices. Surg Endosc 32:582–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5654-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thomaschewski M, Jürgens T, Keck T, Laubert T, Benecke C (2021) Learning laparoscopic surgery skills with a 4K ultra-high definition 2D vs a three-dimensional HD laparoscopic system: results from a prospective randomized trial. Surg Innov 28:760–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350621991224

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zwimpfer TA, Wismer C, Fellmann-Fischer B, Geiger J, Schötzau A, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V (2022) Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study. Updat Surg 74:1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01195-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Kanaji S, Watanabe R, Mascagni P, Trauzettel F, Urade T, Longo F, Guerriero L, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Kakeji Y, Marescaux J (2020) Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial. Surg Endosc 34:5083–5091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07308-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parshad R, Nanjakla Jayappa S, Bhattacharjee HK, Suhani S, Joshi MK, Bhoi D, Kashyap L (2022) Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study. Surg Endosc 36:1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08377-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singla V, Bhattacharjee H, Gupta E, Singh D, Mishra A, Kumar D (2022) Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minimal Access Surg 18:167. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_122_21

Article  Google Scholar 

Harada H, Kanaji S, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Sumi Y, Nakamura T, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2018) The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 32:4228–4234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6169-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beattie KL, Hill A, Horswill MS, Grove PM, Stevenson ARL (2021) Laparoscopic skills training: the effects of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on skill acquisition and transfer. Surg Endosc 35:4332–4344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07923-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Watanabe Y, Ebihara Y, Tamoto E, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S (2017) Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31:1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5074-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kang ML, Wong CMJ, Tan H, Bohari A, Han TO, Soon Y (2021) A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices. Surg Endosc 35:1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07466-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, Arolfo S, Barberio M, Boni L, Brodie R, Bouvy N, Cassinotti E, Carus T, Checcucci E, Custers P, Diana M, Jansen M, Jaspers J, Marom G, Momose K, Müller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Perretta S, Porpiglia F, Sánchez-Margallo F, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Schijven M, Silecchia G, Passera R, Mintz Y (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 33:3251–3274

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sakata S, Grove PM, Hill A, Watson MO, Stevenson ARL (2017) Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy. Br J Surg 104:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10528

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kunert W, Storz P, Dietz N, Axt S, Falch C, Kirschniak A, Wilhelm P (2021) Learning curves, potential and speed in training of laparoscopic skills: a randomised comparative study in a box trainer. Surg Endosc 35:3303–3312

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar