Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, de Smet MD, Gaudric A, Reichel E, et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2611–9.
Cho SC, Park SJ, Byun SJ, Woo SJ, Park KH. Five-year nationwide incidence of macular hole requiring surgery in Korea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1619–23.
Darian-Smith E, Howie AR, Allen PL, Vote BJ. Tasmanian macular hole study: whole population-based incidence of full thickness macular hole. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44:812–6.
McCannel CA, Ensminger JL, Diehl NN, Hodge DN. Population-based incidence of macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1366–9.
Forsaa VA, Lindtjørn B, Kvaløy JT, Frøystein T, Krohn J. Epidemiology and morphology of full-thickness macular holes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:397–404.
Eckardt C, Eckardt U, Groos S, Luciano L, Reale E. [Removal of the internal limiting membrane in macular holes. Clinical and morphological findings]. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94:545–51.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Steel DH, Donachie PHJ, Aylward GW, Laidlaw DA, Williamson TH, Yorston D. Factors affecting anatomical and visual outcome after macular hole surgery: findings from a large prospective UK cohort. Eye. 2021;35:316–25.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:390–3.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ch’ng SW, Patton N, Ahmed M, Ivanova T, Baumann C, Charles S, et al. The manchester large macular hole study: is it time to reclassify large macular holes? Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;195:36–42.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2018–25.
Shiode Y, Morizane Y, Matoba R, Hirano M, Doi S, Toshima S, et al. The role of inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:4847–55.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Agrawal V, Jindal K, Dhakad Y, Rathore P, Khilnani K. Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: a comparative study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70:909–13.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manasa S, Kakkar P, Kumar A, Chandra P, Kumar V, Ravani R. Comparative evaluation of standard ILM peel with inverted ILM flap technique in large macular holes: a prospective, randomized study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:236–40.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kannan NB, Kohli P, Parida H, Adenuga OO, Ramasamy K. Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:177.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Velez-Montoya R, Ramirez-Estudillo JA, Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano C, Bejar-Cornejo F, Sanchez-Ramos J, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, et al. Inverted ILM flap, free ILM flap and conventional ILM peeling for large macular holes. Int J Retin Vitreous. 2018;4:8.
Shen Y, Lin X, Zhang L, Wu M. Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:14.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rizzo S, Tartaro R, Barca F, Caporossi T, Bacherini D, Giansanti F. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes: a comparative study in a large series of patients. Retina. 2018;38:S73–s8.
Murphy DC, Al-Zubaidy M, Lois N, Scott N, Steel DH. The effect of macular hole duration on surgical outcomes: an individual participant data study of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2023;130:152–63.
Chen SN. Large semicircular inverted internal limiting membrane flap in the treatment of macular hole in high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255:2337–45.
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Steel DH, Downey L, Greiner K, Heimann H, Jackson TL, Koshy Z, et al. The design and validation of an optical coherence tomography-based classification system for focal vitreomacular traction. Eye. 2016;30:314–24.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ventre L, Fallico M, Longo A, Parisi G, Russo A, Bonfiglio V, et al. Conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap for small-to-medium idiopathic macular hole: a randomized trial. Retina. 2022;42:2251–7.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baumann C, Kaye S, Iannetta D, Sultan Z, Dwivedi R, Pearce I. Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap on closure rate, postoperative visual acuity, and restoration of outer retinal layers in primary idiopathic macular hole surgery. Retina. 2020;40:1955–63.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Guidance document: Prioritisation of ophthalmic procedures: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. 2020. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/resources-listing/prioritisation-of-ophthalmic-procedures/.
Leisser C, Ruiss M, Pilwachs C, Findl O. ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial. Spektrum Augenheilkd. 2023;37:9–14.
Ehrhardt A, Delpuech M, Luc A, Zessler A, Pastor G, Angioi-Duprez K, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after macular hole surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique with conventional peeling. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7:227–35.
Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H, Iwasaki M, Ogushi Y, Okamoto F, et al. Best surgical technique and outcomes for large macular holes: retrospective multicentre study in Japan. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:e904–e10.
Chou HD, Liu L, Wang CT, Chen KJ, Wu WC, Hwang YS, et al. Single-layer inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus conventional peel for small- or medium-sized full-thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;235:111–9.
Kwak JJ, Byeon SH. Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis. Eye. 2022;37:1207–13.
Baba T, Yamamoto S, Arai M, Arai E, Sugawara T, Mitamura Y, et al. Correlation of visual recovery and presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after successful macular hole repair. Retina. 2008;28:453–8.
Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Oshima Y. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1815–24.
Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, Hiraoka T, Hirakata A. Significant correlation between visual acuity and recovery of foveal cone microstructures after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:111–9.
Bleidißel N, Friedrich J, Feucht N, Klaas J, Maier M. Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:3161–71.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rossi T, Gelso A, Costagliola C, Trillo C, Costa A, Gesualdo C, et al. Macular hole closure patterns associated with different internal limiting membrane flap techniques. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255:1073–8.
Comments (0)