Available online 11 March 2024, 100735

Digital health engagement measures are inconsistent and often limited to system use.

The conceptualisation and definitions of components of engagement lack clarity.

Two recent scales based on similar theory capture engagement differently.

Further work is needed to address gaps in the measurement of engagement.

Digital tools are an increasingly important component of healthcare, but their potential impact is commonly limited by a lack of user engagement. Digital health evaluations of engagement are often limited to system usage metrics, which cannot capture a full understanding of how and why users engage with an intervention. This study aimed to examine how theory-based, multifaceted measures of engagement with digital health interventions capture different components of engagement (affective, cognitive, behavioural, micro, and macro) and consider areas that are unclear or missing in their measurement. We identified and compared two recently developed measures that met these criteria (the Digital Behaviour Change Intervention Engagement Scale and the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale). Despite having similar theoretical-bases and being relatively strongly correlated, there are key differences in how these scales aim to capture engagement. We discuss the implications of our analysis for how affective, cognitive, and behavioural components of engagement can be conceptualised and whether there is value in distinguishing between them. We conclude with recommendations for the circumstances in which each scale may be most useful and for how future measure development could supplement existing scales.

Engagement

Digital health

Telemedicine

eHealth

Measure

Behaviour change

© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V.