Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52(2):155–170

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

vanSteenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Hermann I (1990) Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5(3):272–281

CAS  Google Scholar 

Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, vanSteenberghe D (2002) Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(4):381–389

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hureler M, Faehen O, Sanavi F (2003) Multicenter prospective clinical trial of 3i machined surface implants: result after 6 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(3):417–423

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neugebauer J, Nickenig HJ, Zöller JE, Bolz W, Bowen A, Deporter D et al (2016) Guidelines of the 11th European Consensus Conference. Short, angulated and diameter-reduced implants. EDI J 12(1):16–19

Google Scholar 

Neugebauer J, Nickenig HJ, Zöller JE (2023) Guideline 2023: 2nd Update on short, angulated and diameter-reduced implants 18th European Consensus Conference (EuCC). EDI Journal 19(1):2–10

Google Scholar 

Benlidayi ME, Ucar Y, Tatli U, Ekren O, Evlice B, Kisa HI et al (2018) Short implants versus standard implants. Implant Dent 27(1):95–100

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lemos CAA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP (2016) Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 47(1):8–17

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hong DGK, Oh JH (2017) Recent advances in dental implants. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 39(1):33

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE (2015) EAO supplement working group 4-EAO CC 2015 short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(11):154–169

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cruz RS, Lemos CA de A, Batista VE de S, Oliveira HFF, Gomes JM de L, Pellizzer EP et al (2018) Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res 32:e86

Nielsen HB, Schou S, Isidor F, Christensen AE, Starch-Jensen T (2019) Short implants (≤8 mm) compared to standard-length implants (≥8 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(2):239–249

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jelovac D, Micic M, Hajdarevic S, Kuzmanovic C, Cukic B, Stefanovic B et al (2023) Immediate placement of extra-short implants in refined scapula tip microvascular free flaps: in house virtual planning and surgical technique–Proof of concept. Heliyon 9(1):e18021

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang F, Huang W, Zhang C, Sun J, Kaigler D, Wu Y (2015) Comparative analysis of dental implant treatment outcomes following mandibular reconstruction with double-barrel fibula bone grafting or vertical distraction osteogenesis fibula: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(2):157–165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shephard DA (1976) The 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and consent. Can Med Assoc J 115(12):1191–1192

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2023) JAMA. 310(20):2191–94.

https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 19.01.2024

ASA Physical Status Classification System. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system. Accessed 19.01.2024

Cosola S, Marconcini S, Boccuzzi M, Menchini FGB, Covani U, Peñarrocha-Diago M et al (2020) Radiological outcomes of bone-level and tissue-level dental implants: systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(18):6920

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Betthäuser M, Schilter R, Enkling N, Suter VGA, Abou-Ayash S, Schimmel M (2022) Clinical outcomes of different implant types in mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a retrospective analysis with up to 20 years follow-up. Int J Implant Dent 8(1):38

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Avağ C, Akkocaoğlu M (2023) The evaluation of stress on bone level and tissue level short implants: a finite element analysis (FEA) study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 124(1):101298

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mombelli A (2000) Lang NP (1994) Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 4(1):81–86

Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Kozlovsky A, Tal H, Laufer BZ, Leshem R, Rohrer MD, Weinreb M et al (2007) Impact of implant overloading on the peri-implant bone in inflamed and non-inflamed peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(5):601–610

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klinberg IJ, Trulsson M, Murray GM (2012) Occlusion on implants-is there a problem? J Oral Rehabil 39(7):522–537

Article  Google Scholar 

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1(1):11–25

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Windisch P, Martin A, Shahbazi A, Molnar B (2017) Reconstruction of horizontovertical alveolar defects. Presentation of a novel split-thickness flap design for guided bone regeneration: a case report with 5-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 48(7):535–547

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shahbazi A, Feigl G, Sculean A, Grimm A, Palkovics D, Molnár B et al (2021) Vascular survey of the maxillary vestibule and gingiva—clinical impact on incision and flap design in periodontal and implant surgeries. Clin Oral Investig 25(2):539–546

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Joób FA, Divinyi T, Fazekas A, Pető G, Karacs A (2000) A fogászati implantátumok felületkezelése nagyteljesítményű lézersugárral. Fogorv Sz 93:169–180

Google Scholar 

Joób FA, Karacs A, Pető G, Körmöczi K, Bogdán S, Huszár T (2016) Effects of a nano-structured surface layer on titanium implants for osteoblast proliferation activity. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 13(7):7–25

Google Scholar 

Körmöczi K, Komlós G, Papócsi P, Horváth F, Joób-Fancsaly Á (2021) The early loading of different surface-modified implants: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 21(1):207

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yin L, Chang Y, You Y, Liu C, Li J, Lai HC (2019) Biological responses of human bone mesenchymal stem cells to Ti and TiZr implant materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 21(4):550–564

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD (2011) Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4):349–356

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Şener-Yamaner ID, Yamaner G, Sertgöz A, Çanakçi CF, Özcan M (2017) Marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive implants. Implant Dent 26(4):592–599

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharma A, Waddell JN, Li KC, Sharma A, L, Prior DJ, Duncan WJ, (2021) Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis. Saudi Dent J 33(7):546–553

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haimov E, Sarikov R, Haimov H, Juozdbalys G (2023) Differences in titanium, titanium-zirconium, zirconia implants treatment outcomes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res 14(3):1–13

Article  Google Scholar 

Naguib GH, Hashem ABH, Natto ZS, Abougazia AO, Mously HA, Hamed MT (2023) The effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution of tooth-implant and implant supported fixed prostheses: an in vitro finite element analysis study. J Oral Implantol 49(1):46–54

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arosio P, Arosio F, Di Stefano DA (2020) Implant diameter, length, and the insertion torque/depth integral: a study using polyurethane foam blocks. Dent J (Basel) 8(2):56

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim S-Y, Ku J-K, Kim H-S, Yun P-Y, Kim Y-K (2018) A retrospective clinical study of single short implants (less than 8 mm) in posterior edentulous areas. J Adv Prosthodont 10(3):191

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tabrizi R, Arabion H, Aliabadi E, Hasanzadeh F (2016) Does increasing the number of short implants reduce marginal bone loss in the posterior mandible? A prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(7):731–735

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vargas-Moreno VF, Ribeiro MCO, Gomes RS, Faot F, Del Bel CAA, Marcello-Machado RM (2023) Clinical performance of short and extra short dental implants with wide diameter: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ku J, Yi YJ, Yun PY, Kim YK (2016) Retrospective clinical study of ultrawide implants more than 6 mm in diameter. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38(1):30

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gottlow J, Sennerby L (2023) Influence of diameter and length on primary stability in various implant site densities—an in vitro study in polyurethane blocks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13290

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu HC, Huang HL, Fuh LJ, Tsai MT, Hsu JT (2023) Effect of implant length and insertion depth on primary stability of short dental implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 38(1):62–70

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Fiore A, Vigolo P, Sivolella S, Cavallin F, Katsoulis J, Monaco C et al (2019) Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on long-term marginal bone loss around short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(4):992–998