R3 Report Issue 11: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Hospitals | The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/r3-report/r3-report-issue-11-pain-assessment-and-management-standards-for-hospitals/#.ZGJLWezMIq2. Accessed 7 July 2023.
Turk DC, Okifuji A. Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:678–90.
Creamer P, Hochberg MC. Why does osteoarthritis of the knee hurt--sometimes? Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:726–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
EQ-5D. https://euroqol.org/. Accessed 7 July 2023.
Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33:337–43.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Longworth L, et al. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1–224.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Payakachat N, Ali MM, Tilford JM. Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change?A systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:1137.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schwenkglenks M, Matter-Walstra K. Is the EQ-5D suitable for use in oncology? An overview of the literature and recent developments. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16:207–19.
Herdman M, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:647–73.
Stucki G, et al. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:796–803.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abou-Al-Shaar H, Adogwa O, Mehta AI. Lumbar spinal stenosis: objective measurement scales and ambulatory status. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:765–74.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hara N, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Japanese version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): reliability and validity. PLoS One. 2016;11
Tomkins CC, Battié MC, Hu R. Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1896–901.
Azimi P, et al. Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score. J Neurosurg Sci. 2014;58:177–82.
Fukushima M, et al. Evaluation of the minimum clinically important differences of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33:E499–503.
Bouknaitir JB, Carreon LY, Brorson S, Andersen MØ. Translation and validation of the Danish Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Global Spine J. 2022;12:53–60.
Comer CM, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:1969–76.
Kreiner DS, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013;13:734–43.
Pratt RK, Fairbank JCT, Virr A. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:84–91.
Lovejoy TI, Turk DC, Morasco BJ. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised short-form McGill pain questionnaire. J Pain. 2012;13:1250–7.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burckhardt CS, Jones KD. Adult measures of pain: The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Verbal Descriptive Scale (VDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and West Haven-Yale Multidisciplinary Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:S96–104.
Williams DA, Arnold LM. Measures of fibromyalgia: Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, and Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MASQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11).
Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:199–202.
Mendoza TR, et al. The utility and validity of the modified brief pain inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:357–62.
Cleeland, C. S. The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide. 2009.
Majedi H, et al. Validation of the Persian version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-P) in chronic pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54:132-138.e2.
Im DD, Jambaulikar GD, Kikut A, Gale J, Weiner SG. Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form: a new method for assessing pain in the emergency department. Pain Med. 2020;21:3263–9.
Dudgeon D, Raubertas RF, Rosenthal SN. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1993;8:191–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ngamkham S, et al. The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in people with cancer: an integrative review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13:27–51.
• Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:503–18. An evaluation of pain assessment tools for low back pain based on psychometric properties and ease of use.
Gauthier LR, et al. Validation of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire-2 in younger and older people with cancer pain. J Pain. 2014;15:756–70.
Stanhope J. Brief Pain Inventory review. Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2016;66:496–7.
Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:491–502.
Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:515–22.
Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Laimi K. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:2116–21.
Thorp J, Willson J. The Neck Disability Index is not correlated with some parameters of temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019;33:39–46.
• Khan I, et al. Does Neck Disability Index correlate with 12-month satisfaction after elective surgery for cervical radiculopathy? Results from a National Spine Registry. Neurosurgery. 2020;86:736–41. Recent study to determine the association of baseline and 12-mo Neck Disability Index (NDI) with patient satisfaction after elective surgery for DCR.
Smeets R, Köke A, Lin CW, Ferreira M, Demoulin C. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11).
Brodke DS, et al. Oswestry Disability Index: a psychometric analysis with 1,610 patients. Spine J. 2017;17:321–7.
Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1484–94.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82:8–24.
Clark P, Lavielle P, Martinez H, et al. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1584–8.
Gracely RH, McGrath P, Dubner R. Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors. Pain (Amsterdam). 1978;5:5–18.
Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:207–19.
Hjermstad MJ, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41:1073–93.
Comments (0)