National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2006.

Google Scholar 

International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.

Bosch de Basea M, Morina D, Figuerola J, Barber I, Muchart J, Lee C, et al. Subtle excess in lifetime cancer risk related to CT scanning in Spanish young people. Environ Int. 2018;120:1–10.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, effects, and risks of ionizing radiation. Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation. Vol 1, Scientific Annex A. 2020/2021 Report to the General Assembly with annexes. New York: United Nations; 2022.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Medical radiation exposure of patients in the United States. NCRP Report No.184. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2019.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Nuntue C, Krisanachinda A, Khamwan K. Optimization of a low-dose 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography chest protocol using a phantom. Asian Biomedicine. 2016;10:269–76.

Google Scholar 

Tongkum S, Suwanpradit P, Vidhyarkorn S, Siripongsakun S, Oonsiri S, Rakvongthai Y, et al. Determination of radiation dose and low-dose protocol for digital chest tomosynthesis using radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass dosimeters. Phys Med. 2020;73:13–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kwee TC, Dijkstra H, Knapen DG, de Vries EGE, Yakar D. Which patients are prone to undergo disproportionate recurrent CT imaging and should we worry? Eur J Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108898.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rehani MM, Heil J, Baliyan V. Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved. Eur Radiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07734-y.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tamam N, Sulieman A, Omer H, Toufig H, Alsaadi M, Salah H, et al. Assessment of breast dose and cancer risk for young females during CT chest and abdomen examinations. Appl Radiat Isot. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110452.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wall B, Haylock R, Jansen J, Hillier M, Hart D, Shrimpton P. Radiation risks from medical x-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Report HPA-CRCE-028. Chilton: Health Protection Agency; 2011.

Mahmoodi M, Chaparian A. Organ doses, effective dose, and cancer risk from coronary CT angiography examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:1131–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karimizarchi H, Chaparian A. Estimating risk of exposure induced cancer death in patients undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Radioprotection. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2016087.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zewde N, Ria F, Rehani MM. Organ doses and cancer risk assessment in patients exposed to high doses from recurrent CT exams. Eur J Radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110224.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee S, Kim J, Han S. A comparative review of radiation-induced cancer risk models. J Radiat Prot Res. 2017;42:130–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

EPA. Radiogenic cancer risk models and projections for the U.S. population. Report EPA 402-R-11–001. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011.

World Health Organization. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

Google Scholar 

Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235592100.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hendee WR, O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology. 2012;264:312–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Souza Ribeiro JC, de Mendes JDS, de Sá LV. Attributable patient risk in nuclear medicine procedures and establishment of diagnostic reference levels. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13658.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suksancharoen W, Lowong T, Krisanachinda A. Assessment of patient radiation dose from recurrent ct examinations. Medical Physics International. 2021;9:93–6.

Google Scholar 

Brower C, Rehani MM. Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging. Br J Radiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210389.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khan AN, Khosa F, Nikolic B, Shuaib W, Lin PJ, Khan MK. Cancerogenesis risks between 64 and 320 row detector CT for coronary CTA screening. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.131640.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH. Diagnostic radiology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2020.

Google Scholar 

Harbron RW, Chapple CL, O'Sullivan JJ, Best KE, Berrington de González A, Pearce MS. Survival adjusted cancer risks attributable to radiation exposure from cardiac catheterisations in children. Heart. 2017;103:341–6.

Majer M, Knežević Z, Saveta M. Current trends in estimating risk of cancer from exposure to low doses of ionising radiation. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2014;65:251–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kiani M, Chaparian A. Evaluation of image quality, organ doses, effective dose, and cancer risk from pediatric brain CT scans. Eur J Radiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110657.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kiani M, Bagheri J, Chaparian A. Evaluation of image quality, organ dose, effective dose and cancer risk in pediatric chest CT procedure. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2023;40:1029–36.

Google Scholar 

Adeleye B, Chetty N. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections. Open Physics. 2017;15:769–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lim H, Choi J, Kim JH, Cheong HK, Ha M. Estimation of cancer incidence and mortality risks attributed to diagnostic medical radiation exposure in Korea, 2013. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e211.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang B, Li J, Law MW, Zhang J, Shen Y, Khong PL. Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:152–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bayer HealthCare Medical Care. CT organ dose calculations in Radimetrics™ Enterprise Platform by Bayer. Indianola: Bayer Pharma AG; 2016.

National Statistical Office Thailand. Abridged life table for population in Thailand, 2005–2006. 2006. http://www.nso.go.th. Accessed 30 March 2022

World Health Organization (WHO). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today, Thailand: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today. Accessed 1 April 2022

International Atomic Energy Agency. Quality assurance programme for computed tomography: diagnostic and therapy applications. IAEA Human Health Series No.19. Vienna: IAEA; 2012

Brambilla M, Cannillo B, D’Alessio A, Matheoud R, Agliata MF, Carriero A. Patients undergoing multiphase CT scans and receiving a cumulative effective dose of ≥ 100 mSv in a single episode of care. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:4452–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization (WHO). Global Cancer Observatory: Globocan 2020 Thailand. Summary statistic 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/764-thailand-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2022

Maxwell S, Fox R, McRobbie D, Bulsara M, Doust J, O’Leary P, et al. How have advances in CT dosimetry software impacted estimates of CT radiation dose and cancer incidence? A comparison of CT dosimetry software: Implications for past and future research. PLoS ONE. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217816.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar