Teaching NeuroImage: Severe Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities After Anti-{beta}-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibody Treatment

A 74-year-old woman with mild Alzheimer disease joined a clinical trial of anti–amyloid-β therapy. Three weeks after receiving remternetug, a N3pH-Aβ monoclonal antibody, a scheduled brain MRI showed new periventricular and subcortical FLAIR hyperintensities (Figure, A) suggestive of mild amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA).1,2 Two weeks later, she was hospitalized for rapid cognitive and functional decline. Her admission examination was notable for severe disorientation, inattention, and global aphasia. Repeat MRI showed diffuse and confluent FLAIR hyperintensities consistent with progression to severe ARIA-edema/effusion (ARIA-E), but no hemosiderosis/microhemorrhages (ARIA-H) (Figure, B). She was treated with steroids and continued to have a gradual improvement in her cognition and language. A follow-up MRI 6 weeks later showed a marked reduction in FLAIR hyperintensities (Figure, C). In clinical trials, ARIA-E has often been observed to improve within 3–4 months.2 Early suspicion of ARIAs is essential for identifying and managing this adverse effect of anti–amyloid-β therapy.

FigureFigureFigure Brain MRI

(A) FLAIR hyperintensities in the periventricular and subcortical white matter. (B) At symptom onset 3 weeks later, MRI showed extensive confluent subcortical FLAIR hyperintensities, most prominently in the parieto-occipital lobes and right temporal lobe. No corresponding susceptibility, diffusion restriction, or postcontrast enhancement was observed. (C) Significant improvement after 6 weeks. FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

Author Contributions

S. Bonomi: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; Study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data. A. Samara: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; study concept or design; Analysis or interpretation of data. N. Balestra: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in the acquisition of data; Study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data. A. Padalia: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; Major role in the acquisition of data; analysis or interpretation of data. T.L.S. Benzinger: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; analysis or interpretation of data. P. Kang: drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data.

Study Funding

The authors report no targeted funding.

Disclosure

The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Footnotes

Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Resident & Fellow Section Editor Whitley Aamodt, MD, MPH.

For multiple-choice questions relevant to Teaching NeuroImages and Teaching Video NeuroImages, find @greenjournal on Twitter using the hashtag #NeurologyRF

Received June 26, 2023.Accepted in final form August 22, 2023.© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif