Effect of addition of polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and zirconia particles on impact strength, surface hardness, and roughness of heat cure PMMA: An in vitro study
Duaa Subhi Rasan1, Firas Abdulameer Farhan2
1 MSc student, Karbala, Iraq
2 Prosthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Bab Al-Muadham campus of the University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Correspondence Address:
Duaa Subhi Rasan
MSc student, Karbala
Iraq
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
CheckDOI: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_151_22
Introduction: This study was designed to examine the effects of addition of the combination of polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and zirconia (ZrO2) particles to heat cure PMMA resin on impact strength, surface hardness, and roughness. Methods: The 70% (w/w) of polymerized PMMA powder (particle size: 0.70 µm) was mixed with 30% (w/w) of zirconia powder (ZrO2) (1 µm) to produce PMMA-ZrO2 filler. Ninety acrylic specimens created were divided into three groups containing 0% wt (Control group), 2% wt, and 4% wt, PMMA-ZrO2 filler. Ten specimens were used for impact strength, surface hardness and roughness test, blindly. Data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test using R 3.6.3. Results: There was statistically significant difference among study groups regarding surface hardness and roughness (p < 0.001). Yet, nonsignificant difference was found on the subject of impact strength (p = 0.33). Post hoc test showed statistically significant difference for all pairwise comparisons as regards surface hardness and roughness (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The incorporation of PMMA-ZrO2 filler did not improve impact strength (resistance during an unexpected blows or dropping). Yet, increased surface roughness and hardness, concentration-dependently.
Keywords: denture base, impact strength, polymerized polymethyl methacrylate particles, polymethyl methacrylate resin, surface hardness, surface roughness, zirconia; zirconium oxide
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin is a well-known polymeric material utilized as a denture base material. This is because of the easy handling, reparability, and biocompatibility with oral tissues. PMMA resin was reported to have insufficient hardness and low-impact strength.[1],[2] The addition of fillers and fibers to PMMA is a popular method to enhance physical and mechanical properties.[3] The addition of polymerized PMMA particles to heat-cure acrylic resin decreased water solubility, water sorption, and residual monomer release.[4]
Metal oxides have piqued the interest of academics and scientists worldwide due to their diverse and promising uses in fields such as materials science, medicine, and industrial inspection.[5] A recent systematic review on influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA showed greater flexural strength than the control group, which can clearly affect users of complete denture. In addition, the impact resistance and surface hardness reduced in comparison with the control group.[6] Another recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed addition of zirconia on PMMA with concentration ranged 0.5 to 5 wt% enhances the flexural strength. [7],[8]
The current study aimed to examine the effects of addition of the combination of polymerized PMMA and zirconia particles to heat cure PMMA resin on impact strength, surface hardness, and roughness.
Materials and methodsThe study was approved by the research ethics committee of the College of Dentistry/University of Baghdad (Ref. No. 755, January 2, 2023).
Balls of heat cure PMMA resin (Spofa Dental, Markova, Czech Republic) were created according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The resulted PMMA balls were grounded by the mechanical grinding-milling machine (Silver Crest, Zhejiang, China) and sieved by the sieving machine (FRITSCH, GmbH, Germany) to produce a powder with an average of 0.70 µm particle. The 70% (w/w) of polymerized PMMA powder (0.70 µm) was mixed with 30% (w/w) of zirconia powder (ZrO2) (1 µm) (FIXANAL, Sigma. Aldrich, Germany) to produce PMMA-ZrO2 filler. The selection of particle sizes and the ratio of the addition of zirconia to PMMA resin were designated according to the pilot study. Ninety acrylic specimens were created and divided into three groups containing 0% Control group, 2% and 4% (w/w) PMMA-ZrO2 filler. Ten specimens were used for each test.
Specimen’s diamines were 65 mm × 10 mm × 2.5 mm according to ADA specification No. 12[9] for hardness and surface roughness tests, and for the impact strength test were 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm according to ISO, 179-1: 2010 (www.iso.org/standard/44852.html).
The Charpy impact strength test was used according to the standard test method ASTM D6110 (www.astm.org/d6110-18.html) using impact tester TMI No. 43-1 (Testing Machines Inc., Amityville, New York, USA). The shore D hardness test was employed according to the standard test method ASTM D2240 (www.astm.org/d2240-15r21.html) and ISO 868:2003 (www.iso.org/standard/34804.html) using Analoger Shore-Härteprüfer 311 x (Härteprüfer, ZwickRoell GmbH & Co., Germany). A portable roughness tester (TR220 Salu Tron, GmbH, Germany) was used to analyze the surface roughness according to ANSI/ADA specification No. 12-2002 (https://urlis.net/80y3976) equipped with a diamond surface analyzer. Before the test, all specimens were ultrasonically cleaned with alcohol to reduce physical and chemical contamination of the surfaces.
All tests were carried out blindly. Data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test using R 3.6.3 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
ResultsThere was statistically significant difference among study groups regarding surface hardness and roughness (p < 0.001). Yet, nonsignificant difference was found on the subject of impact strength (p = 0.33). Post hoc test showed statistically significant difference for all pairwise comparisons as regards surface hardness and roughness (p < 0.05) [Figure 1].
Figure 1 Violin plot summarizes the center, spread, and density of date related to impact strength (kJ/m2) (green), surface hardness (blue), and surface roughness (µm) (pink). DiscussionIn the current study, a mixture of polymerized PMMA and zirconia particles was added as a filler to improve the mechanical and physical properties of PMMA resin. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt in this regard. The impact strength values (resistance during an unexpected blows or) revealed a nonsignificant increase in the 2% and 4% PMMA-ZrO2 filler groups when compared to the control group. Surface hardness and roughness values increased with increasing PMMA-ZrO2 filler ratio.
Ayad N et al., reported addition of 5 and 15% zirconia to PMMA affected the impact strength and surface hardness nonsignificantly.[10] Ozdemir AK et al., showed addition of 1% colemanite to PMMA increased the impact strength.[11] Abdallah RM showed addition of 0.3 wt% halloysite nanotubes increased surface hardness.[12] Zhang XY showed addition of 3 wt% of nano-ZrO₂/aluminum borate whiskers increased surface hardness of PMMA.[13],[14] Hasanen A et al., showed the addition of 3%, 5%, and 7% SiO2 increased surface hardness and reduced impact strength.[15] Narrative review of Gad MM et al., reported the impact strength of PMMA increased via addition of glass fiber, Polyethylene and Polypropylene fiber, aluminum, TiO2, and carbon nanotubes. Surface hardness of PMMA will increase by the addition of aluminum, silanized nano TiO2, nano SiO2. In contrast, they reported addition of carbon nanotubes decreased surface hardness. Addition of silver–zinc zeolite, aluminum, fluoride glass, silanized nono-zirconia slightly increased surface roughness. Yet, addition of 3 wt% of silanized TiO2 significantly increased surface roughness of PMMA.[16],[17] Systematic review of Aldegheishem A et al., showed impact strength lean toward rise if the fillers are chemically fused and well dispersed in PMMA resin.[18]However, readers must note the limitations of in vitro studies, which cannot simulate clinical situations exactly. More long-time clinical studies are required to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety of addition PMMA-ZrO2 filler to denture base resin.
Financial support and sponsorship
The study was not funded by any agency or organization.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
References
Comments (0)