Biological toxicity of Ruta graveolens essential oil against three species of diptera Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata



    Table of Contents RESEARCH ARTICLE Year : 2022  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 320-326

Biological toxicity of Ruta graveolens essential oil against three species of diptera Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata

Hayette Bouabida, Djemaa Dris
Water and Environment Laboratory, Echahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi University Tebessa, Algeria

Date of Submission18-Jan-2022Date of Acceptance27-May-2022Date of Web Publication07-Feb-2023

Correspondence Address:
Hayette Bouabida
Water and Environment Laboratory, Echahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi University, Tebessa
Algeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9062.353272

Rights and Permissions

Background & objectives: Recently, the use of biodegradable and environment friendly plant-based bioinsecticides has received a great deal of attention from researchers to control insect disease vectors. The aim of this research is to determine the larvicidal efficacy of Ruta graveolens essential oil against third instar larvae of two species of mosquito (Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata) and a biological model Drosophila melanogaster.
Methods: Culiseta longiareolata and Culex pipiens larvae were collected from untreated areas located in Tebessa and Drosophila melanogaster, the wild strain collected from rotten apples in the Tebessa region. Ruta graveolens essential oil has been tested at different concentrations between 2.5μ/mL and 140μL/mL against third instar larvae of the three species under standard laboratory conditions according to the recommendations from the Word Health Organization. The effects were examined on mortality, growth and the main components (proteins, carbohydrates, lipids).
Results: The essential oil showed larvicidal activity with LC50 and LC90 values (10.85μL/mL, 70.95μL/mL and 39.4μL/mL), (26μL/mL, 144.5μL/mL and 89.57μL/mL) against third instar larvae of Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata respectively. In addition, it disrupted the growth and several morphological malformations were observed. It also affected growth and the main components (proteins, carbohydrates, lipids).
Interpretation & conclusion: The essential oil affected growth and energy reserves for all three species. The results indicated that the essential oil of Ruta graveolens has good potential as a source of natural larvicides.

Keywords: larvicidal activity; mosquitoes; essential oil; Drosophila melanogaster; growth; energy reserves


How to cite this article:
Bouabida H, Dris D. Biological toxicity of Ruta graveolens essential oil against three species of diptera Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata. J Vector Borne Dis 2022;59:320-6
How to cite this URL:
Bouabida H, Dris D. Biological toxicity of Ruta graveolens essential oil against three species of diptera Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata. J Vector Borne Dis [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 9];59:320-6. Available from: http://www.jvbd.org//text.asp?2022/59/4/320/353272   Introduction Top

Diptera are dangerous medicinal and veterinary insect pests in the world[1]. In particular, mosquitoes (Culicidae), which transmit many viruses, parasites and nematodes, that cause dangerous diseases[2]. Cx. pipiens is one of the most abundant mosquito species in the Mediterranean region[3] and mates in open spaces and requires a blood meal for laying[4]. Culex pipiens is a vector of West Nile Virus (WNV), periodic filariasis and deadly encephalitis[5]. WNV has caused epidemics such as invasive neurological diseases around the world over the past decades[6]. The mosquito Culiseta longiareolata is multivoltin[7] and hibernated as larvae and adult females[8] with abundance in many countries such as Europe, Africa and Asia[9]. Culiseta longiareolata is the main vector of avian malaria and various arboviruses. It can also be the vector of many human diseases (brucellosis, avian influenza, West Nile Encephalitis)[10]. Thomas Hunt Morgan (in 1910) was the first to introduce Drosophila melanogaster (Drosophilidae) as a research model. Recently, the fruit fly is considered as a model organism in toxicology studies[11],[12],[13]. Control of mosquito larvae depends on the use of synthetic insecticides[14], but unfortunately chemicals are expensive, in addition to their negative impact on human and animal health[15]. Therefore, there is a need to develop insecticides that are safe for the environment and humans. In this context, vegetable essential oils have been shown to be environmentally safe insecticides and have little or no effect on non-target organisms[16],[17]. The aim of the present investigation was to determine the insecticidal properties of a Mediterranean plant Ruta graveolens from the south-eastern region of Algeria, against two species of mosquitoes (Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata) and a biological model Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on growth and main biochemical components (proteins, carbohydrates and lipids).

  Material & Methods Top

Test insects

The two mosquito species (Cx. pipiens and Cs. longiareolata) were collected from sites in the Tebessa region (south-eastern Algeria). Each of the 30 larvae was reared in vessels containing 150 mL of tap water and kept at 25°C. The larvae were fed a mixture of dry biscuit and yeast. The water was changed every 2 days as described previously[18].

Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen, 1830), the wild strain was harvested from rotten apples in the Tebessa region. The flies were reared in 250 mL glass vials containing about 5 mL of standard medium (corn flour, agar and a preservative). They were maintained at a temperature of 25±2°C and a relative humidity of 65% as previously described[19].

Plant material, extraction and yield of essential oil

The leaves of the Ruta graveolens plant (Rutaceae) were harvested in 2020 in a semi-arid region in Algeria (Tebessa), the plant material was dried in the open air and in the shade; 100 g of the dry matter of the plant with 1000 mL of distilled water are introduced into a Clevenger type hydrodistillator for 3 h for extraction. The essential oil has been dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, then recovered and stored at 4°C in the dark in a glass flask. The yield of essential oil is the ratio between the weight of the oil extracted and the weight of the dry matter of the plant, evaluated from 6 extractions.

Larvicidal tests

Larvicidal activity against Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata

The larvicidal activity of Ruta graveolens EO was evaluated as described previously[20]. The preparations of increasing concentrations from 6 μL/mL up to 140 μL/ mL, each concentration dissolved in 1 ml of ethanol. For each concentration carried out, four replicates each contain 30 larvae of the third instar of Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata. The treatment was applied in jars each containing 150 mL of dechlorinated water and food for 24 h according to WHO recommendations. In parallel, the positive control series received 1 mL of ethanol while the negative control series contains only water. Mortality was recorded 24 h after treatment.

Toxicability of Ruta graveolens essential oil against third instar Drosophila melanogaster larvae

The effect of essential oil of Ruta graveolens on the mortality of fruit fly larvae was studied according to the method by (Miyazawa et al, 2004)[21] with some rectifications. In this experiment, the third instar larvae of fruit flies were used to determine the toxicity potential of Ruta graveolens EO. The composition of the feed medium was supplemented by different concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 μL/mL). The test compounds were dissolved in 1 mL of acetone and mixed in 50 mL of artificial diet. A control diet was treated with 1 mL of acetone.

The artificial diet was poured into glass vials; 30 third instar larvae were selected to be placed in each vial, for each concentration 4 replicates. Mortalities were recorded after exposure to EO at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and then corrected according to Abbott’s formula (1925), lethal and sublethal concentrations (LC25, LC50 and LC90).

Growth determination

Newly excavated third instar larvae of the three species (Culex pipiens, Culiseta longiareolata and Drosophila melanogaster) were exposed to the LC50 of Ruta graveolens EO (70.95 μL/mL, 39.41 μL/mL and 10.85 μL/mL) respectively for 24 h. The body weight of the surviving larvae was measured using an analytical balance. Weight data were expressed in mg/larva.

Estimation of biochemical composition

Body biochemical analysis of third instar larvae of three species were extracted and quantified as previously described[1]. The newly moulted Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata larvae (L3) were collected (4 replicate seach containing ten individuals) were weighed and extracted into 1m L of trichloroacetic acid (20%). In short, the quantification of proteins was carried out according to the method of Bradford[22], carbohydrates according to the method of Duchateau and Florkin[23] and lipids by the method of Goldsworthy[24] with the following standards: serum albumin bovine, glucose and sunflower oil. Regarding reagents using Coomassie Brilliant Blue, anthrone and vanillin for protein, carbohydrate and lipids respectively. The data were expressed in μg/larva.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using MINITAB software (version 16, Penn State College, PA, USA) and GRAPH PAD PRISM 7. The results obtained were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD).

Ethical statement: Not applicable

  Results Top

Larvicidal activity against Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata

The application of essential oil of Ruta graveolens with different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 90, 120 and 140 μL/mL), (6, 16, 33, 50, 70, 90 μL/mL) on larvae (L3) of Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata showed larvicidal activity with a dose-response relationship [Figure 1]. Corrected mortality was noted at 24 h after treatment. Positive controls (ethanol) had no significant effect against the two mosquito species. The values of the sublethal and lethal concentrations (LC25, LC50 and LC90) are mentioned in the [Table 1].

Table 1: Toxicity of R. graveolens EO applied on larvae (L3) of Cx. pipiens and Cs longiareolata: Determination of lethal and sublethal concentrations (μL/mL)

Click here to view

Figure 1: Effects of R. graveolens EO applied on larvae (L3) of Cx. pipiens (A) and Cs. longiareolata (B): Corrected mortality(%)

Click here to view

Toxi ability of Ruta graveolens essential oil against third instar Drosophila melanogaster

Larvae

[Figure 2] shows the corrected mortality of Drosophila melanogaster after exposure to different concentrations of the tested EO. The highest mortality was observed at a concentration of 30μL/mL of Ruta graveolens at 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment. All the differences between the concentrations used were significant at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h (P<0.001), the sublethal and lethal concentrations (LC25, LC50 and LC90) of EO with their respective confidence intervals (95%) are calculated and given in [Table 2]. After treatment, physical deformities of pupae and adults were recorded in Drosophila melanogaster as the appearance of wrinkled wings make flight impossible, reduction in size and incomplete pupation [Figure 3].

Table 2: Toxicity of R. graveolens EO applied on larvae (L3) of Drosophila melanogaster: Determination of lethal and sublethal concentrations (μL/mL)

Click here to view

Figure 2: Effects of R. graveolens EO applied on larvae (L3) of Drosophila melanogaster: Corrected mortality (%).

Click here to view

Figure 3: (A) pupa no treated (B) size reduction (C) incomplete pupation (D) Adults no treated (E) wrinkled wings Make (F) wrinkled wings Make

Click here to view

Growth determination

Whole body weights were estimated for the third instar larvae of three dipterus species at different times after treatment with R. graveolens EO [Table 3]. In this study, the treatment with the lethal concentrations CL50 (70.95, 39.41 and 10.85 μL/mL) of R. graveolens EO for the Cx. pipiens, Cs. longiareolata and D. melanogaster species respectively. The treatment induces a significant reduction in weight larvae of Cx. pipiens and Cs. ongiareolata at 24 h (p=0.026, p=0.021) and at 48 h (p =0.024, p=0.016). While this decrease is significant at 72 h (p=0.044) for Cs. longiareolata and not significant for Cx. pipiens. Concerning the D. melanogaster larvae, their weight also affected with the treatment at 24 h (p=0.006), 48 h (p=0.011) and at 72 h (p =0.026) as compared to control.

Table 3: Effects of R. graveolens EO (LC50) on weight (mg) against larvae of Cx. pipiens, Cs. longiareolata and D. melanogaster

Click here to view

Estimation of biochemical composition

The amounts of the protein, carbohydrate and lipid components were determined in the whole bodies of third instar larvae of Cx. pipiens, Cs. longiareolata [Table 4] and D. melanogaster [Table 5] at different times (24 h, 48 h and 72 h). Our study showed a decrease in the protein content of larvae of Cx. pipiens, Cs. longiareolata and D. melanogaster treated with R. graveolens EO at 24 h (p=0.030, p=0.012 and p=0.025), at 48 h (p=0.020, p=0.003 and p=0.013) and at 72 h (p= 0.032, p= 0.022 and p=0.037) respectively. Carbohydrate levels showed significant reduction at 24 h (p=0.028) for Cs. longiareolata larvae and at 72 h (p=0.025) in D. melanogaster larvae.

Table 4: Effects of R. graveolens EO (LC50) on the proteins, carbohydrates and lipids (μg/ individual) on the larvae of Cx. pipiens and Cs. longiareolata

Click here to view

Table 5: Effects of R. graveolens EO (LC50) on the proteins, carbohydrates and lipids (μg/ individual) on the larvae of D. melanogaster

Click here to view

Finally, R. graveolens also reduced lipid levels in third instar larvae of Cx pipiens and D. melanogaster to 24 h (p=0.031 and p=0.023) respectively and a decrease for Cs. longiareolata larvae during the periods tested (24 h p=0.018, 48 h p=0.022 and 72 h p =0.031) as compared to control.

  Discussion Top

Ruta graveolens EO has a larvicidal power against mosquitoes and fruitflies at LC50 after 24 h with the following values: 70.95, 39.41 and 10.85 μL/mL for Culex pipiens, Culiseta longiareolata and Drosophila melanogaster respectively. The Rutaceae family is known as an excellent source of essential oils with insecticidal properties. The essential oil of Zanthoxylum limonella has larvicidal activity against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus with the following concentrations: 1%, 5% and 10% with the values of LT50 = 9.78, 5.61, and 0.24 h for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus had LT50 = 28.46, 20.25 and 1.01 h[25]. The essential oils of citrus limon peels demonstrated significant larvicidal properties against third instar larvae of Aedes aegypti, with an LC50 value = 15.48 mg·L-126. The work of Sheng et al.,[21] showed that the application of 100ppm of essential oils from 8 plants Citrus aurantium (leaf and flower) Citrus bergamia (skin) Citrus paradisi (fruit) Citrus limon (fruit) Citrus vulgaris (skin) Citrus medica (skin) Citrus reticulata var. tangerine (skin) Citrus reticulata (skin) belong to the Rutaceae family showed larvicidal activity against Aedes albopictus with a significant mortality of 97.5 ± 2.9, 82.5 ± 2.9, 50.0 ± 4.1 and 47.5 ± 2.9% with Citrus medica, Citrus paradise, Citrus reticulata and Citrus vulgari respectively. In addition, research from Marin et al.,[28] indicates that leaves of Citrus sinensis and Murraya koenigiiwere (Rutaceae) collected in India show activity on third instar larvae of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus with lethal concentrations LC50 (Citrus sinensisegalle) of 0.69 and 0.61 and for M. koenigii it was 1.05% and 0.54% respectively for the two mosquito species. The essential oil of fruits of Poncirus trifoliata had a significant toxic effect on fruit flies and shows an efficacy of up to 90% depending on the dose and time; doses 100 and 200 μg/ml revealed a mortality of 76.2 and 93.2%, respectively after 36 hours of exposure[29]. In the study by De Lacerda Neto et al.,[30], the Dysphania ambrosioides essential oil presented significant action on D. melanogaster mortality. This effect depends on the exposure time (1 h–8 h) and the oil concentration (1, 2 and 4 mg/mL). Similar results have also been reported by Sousa Silveira et al.,[31], who demonstrated that the toxicity of thymol and carvacrol against D. melanogaster were demonstrated with EC50 values of 17.96 and 16.97 μg/ mL, respectively, with 48 h of exposure. The essential oil of a plant native to Mexico (Hyptis mociniana) has shown larvicidal activity against the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster[32]. The results of Tolou et al.[33] indicated that the following plants (Achillea millefolium, Lavandula angustifolia, and Mentha piperita) of spearmint had toxicity against Bracon hebetor bee in fumigation. Fertility is influenced by the body size of mosquitoes and therefore determines their potential for disease transmission[34]. In the present study, the treatment with the EO of Ruta graveolens (LC50) induced a significant reduction in the weight larvae of Culex pipiens, Culiseta longiareolata and Drosophila melanogaster compared to controls in all periods tested. Several studies have reported similar observations using other plant EOs such as Lavandula dentata[35], Ocimum basilicum21 and Rosmarinus officinalis[16]. In the present study, biochemical analysis revealed a decrease in the protein, carbohydrate and fat content in the whole body of the third instar larvae of Culex pipiens, Culiseta longiareolata and Drosophila melanogaster after exposure of Ruta graveolens essential oil compared to the control series. Our results are in agreement with those of Bouguerra & Boukoucha[17] in which a decrease in proteins, carbohydrates and lipids were recorded after application of essential oils of Origanum glandulosum against Culex pipiens larvae.

  Conclusion Top

The present study confirmed the toxic properties of essential oil of Ruta graveolens and showed larvicidal activity against three species of Diptera Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata. Additionally, the essential oil of Ruta graveolens affected larval growth for all three species, this caused a change in the biochemical composition of the larvae. Based on these results we can suggest that this essential oil can be used as a natural insecticide against insects.

Conflict of interest: None

  Acknowledgements Top

The authors thank University of Echahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi, Tebessa, Algeria and the Ministry of High Education and Scientific Research of Algeria.

 

  References Top
1.Soonwera M, Sittichok S. Adulticidal activities of Cymbopogon citratus (Stapf.) and Eucalyptus globulus (Labili.) Essential oils and of their synergistic combinations against Aedes aegypti (L.), Aedes albopictus (Skuse), and Musca domestica (L.). Environ Sci PollutRes 2020; 27: 20201–20214.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Mohafrash SMM, Fallatah SA, Farag, SM, Mossa, ATH. Mentha spicata essential oil nanoformulation and its larvicidal application against Culex pipiens and Musca domestica. Industrial Crops & Products 2020; 157: 112944.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Fotakis E A, Mastrantonio V, Grigoraki L, Porretta D, Puggioli A, Chaskopoulou A, et al. Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2020; 1–10.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Yurchenko AA, Masri RA, Khrabrova, NV. Genomic differentiation and intercontinental population structure of mosquito vectors Culex pipiens pipiens and Culex pipiens molestus. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 7504.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Smith JL, Fonseca DM. Rapid assays for identification of members of Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: Culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004; 70(4): 339–345.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Brugman V, Hernández-Triana L, Medlock J, Fooks A, Carpenter S, Johnson N. The role of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in virus transmission in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018; 15: 389.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.Török E, Ujvárosi B-L, Kolcsár L-P, Keresztes L. Revised checklist and new faunistic data of the Romanian Culicidae (Insecta, Diptera). STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ- BOLYAI BIOLOGIA. LXIII. 2018; 2: 11–25.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Van Pletzen R, Van Der Linde T C DE K. Studies on the biology of Culiseta longiareolata (Macquart) (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull. ent. Res 2018; 71(1): 71–79.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Becker N, Hoffmann D. First record of Culiseta longiareolata (Macquart) for Germany. Eur Mosq Bull 2018; 29: 143–150.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.T, A, MM, H, S.H, A, et al. Baseline Susceptibility of Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae) to Different Imagicides, in Eastern Azerbaijan, Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis 2018 13(4): 407–415.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Adedara IA, Abolaji AO, Rocha JBT, Farombi EO. Diphenyl Diselenide Protects Against Mortality, Locomotor Deficits and Oxidative Stress in Drosophila melanogaster Model of Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity. Neurochem Res 2016; 41: 1430–1438.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Shilpa O, Anupama KP, Antony A, Gurushankara HP. Lead (Pb) induced Oxidative Stress as a Mechanism to Cause Neurotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicology 2021; 462: 152959.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Matthew S, Xu EG, Dumont ER, Meola V, Pikuda O, Cheong RS, et al. Polystyrene micro-and nanoplastics affect locomotion and daily activity of Drosophila melanogaster Environ Sci Nano 2021; 8: 110–121.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Al-Mekhlafi FA, Abtaha N, AL-Malki AM, Al-Wadaan M. Inhibition of the growth and development of mosquito larvae of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) treated with extract from flower of Matricaria chamomilla (Asteraceae). Entomological Research 2020; 50): 138–145.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Choudhary S, Yamini NR, Yadav SK, Kamboj ML, Sharma A. A review: Pesticide residue: Cause of many animal health problems. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(3): 330–333  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Zeghib F, Tine-Djebbar F, Zeghib A, Bachari K, Sifi K, Soltani N. Chemical Composition and Larvicidal Activity of Rosmarinus officinalis Essential Oil Against West Nile Vector Mosquito Culexpipiens (L.). TEOP 2020; 23(6): 1463–1474.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Bouguerra N, Boukoucha M. GC–MS and GC-FID analyses, antimicrobial and insecticidal activities of Origanum glandulosum essential oil and their effect on biochemical content of Cx pipiens larvae. Int J Trop Insect Sci 2021; 41(4): 3173-3186.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Bouabida H, Dris D. Effect of rue (Ruta graveolens) essential oil on mortality, development, biochemical and biomarkers of Culiseta longiareolata. South African Journal of Botany 2020; 133: 139–143.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Kissoum N, Bensafi-Gheraibia H, Hamida ZC, Soltani N. Evaluation of the pesticide Oberon on a model organism Drosophila melanogaster via topical toxicity test on biochemical and reproductive parameters. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C 2020; 228: 108666.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Dris D, Tine-Djebbar F, Bouabida H, Soltani N. Chemical composition and activity of an Ocimum basilicum essential oil on Culex pipiens larvae: Toxicological, biometrical and biochemical aspects. South African Journal of Botany 2017; 113: 362–369.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Miyazawa M, Tsukamoto T, Anzai J, Ishikawa Y. Insecticidal Effect of Phthalides and Furanocoumarins from Angelica acutiloba against Drosophila melanogaster. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52: 4401–4405.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method of the quantitation microgram quantities of protein utilising the principale dye binding. analytic. The Biochemist 1976; 72: 248–254.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.Duchateau G, Florkin M. Sur la tréhalosémie des insects et sa signication. Archives Indect Physiology and Biochemistry 1959; 67: 306–314  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Goldsworthy AC, Mordue W, Guthkelch J. Studies on insect adipokinetic hormones. General and Comparative Enderinal 1972; 18: 306–314.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Soonwera M, Phasomkusolsil S. Adulticidal, larvicidal, pupicidal and oviposition deterrent activities of essential oil from Zanthoxylum limonella Alston (Rutaceae) against Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2017; 7): 967–978.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Gomes PRB, Oliveira MB, Andrade de Sousa D, da Silva JC, Fernandes RP, Louzeiro HC, et al. Larvicidal activity, molluscicide and toxicity of the essential oil of Citrus limon peels against, respectively, Aedes aegypti, Biomphalaria glabrata and Artemia salina. Eclética Química Journal 2019; 44(4): 85–95.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Shenga Z, Jiana R, Xiea F, Chena B, Zhanga K, Lia D, et al. Screening of larvicidal activity of 53 essential oils and their synergistic effect for the improvement of deltamethrin efficacy against Aedes albopictus. Industrial Crops & Products 2020; 145: 112131.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Marin G, Arivoli S, Tennyson S. Larvicidal activity of two Rutaceae species against the vectors of dengue and filarial fever. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2020; 8(2): 166–175.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Rahman A, SiddiquiI SA, Rahman MO, Kang SC. Insecticidal activity of essential oil from seeds of Poncirus trifoliate (L.) RAF. Bangladesh. J Bot 2018; 47(3): 413–419.  Back to cited text no. 29
    30.De Lacerda Neto LJ, Ramos AGB, da Silva RER, Pereira-de-Morais L, Silva FM, da Costa RHS, et al. Myorelaxant Effect of the Dysphania ambrosioides Essential Oil on Sus scrofa domesticus Coronary Artery and Its Toxicity in the Drosophila melanogaster Model. Molecules 2021; 26: 2041.  Back to cited text no. 30
    31.Sousa Silveira Zd, Macêdo NS, Sampaio dos Santos JF, Sampaio de Freitas T, Rodrigues dos Santos Barbosa C, Júnior DLdS, et al. Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity and Efflux Pump Reversal of Thymol and Carvacrol against Staphylococcus aureus and Their Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecules 2020; 25: 2103.  Back to cited text no. 31
    32.EA, E, J, CL, AM, I, et al. Hyptis mociniana (Benth.) Epling Aerial Parts Essential Oil: Chemical Composition and Insecticidal Activity Against Cydia pomonella and Drosophila melanogaster Larvae. TEOP 2021; 24(4): 786–791.  Back to cited text no. 32
    33.Tolou N, Jamshidi M, Jafarlou M, Hasheminia S M. Toxicity and Repellency Effects of, Achillea Millefolium and Lavandula Angustifolia and Mentha Piperita Plants Extracts on Bracon Hebetor Adult Insect. Animal biology 2022; 14(3): 61–70.  Back to cited text no. 33
    34.Farjana T, Tuno N. Multiple Blood Feeding and Host-Seeking Behavior in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2013; 50(4): 838–846.  Back to cited text no. 34
    35.Dris D, Tine-Djebbar F, Soltani N. Lavandula dentata essential oils: chemical composition and larvicidal activity against Culiseta longiareolata and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). African Entomology 2017; 25(2): 387–94.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
  Top

Comments (0)

No login
gif