Sanders T, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan A, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516629944.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fabricant P, Lakomkin N, Cruz A, Spitzer E, Marx R. ACL reconstruction in youth athletes results in an improved rate of return to athletic activity when compared with non-operative treatment: a systematic review of the literature. J Int Soc Arthrosc Knee Surg. 2016;1(2):62–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2015-000013.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ramski D, Kanj W, Franklin C, Baldwin K, Ganley T. Anterior cruciate ligament tears in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of nonoperative versus operative treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2769–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513510889.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liukkonen R, Ponkilainen V, Reito A. Revision rates after primary ACL reconstruction performed between 1969 and 2018: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221110191.

George M, Dunn W, Spindler K. Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):2026–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506295026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Xu C, Cho E, Huangfu X, Zhao J. Reconstruction for chronic ACL tears with or without anterolateral structure augmentation in patients at high risk for clinical failure: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(16):1482. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.20.01680.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El-Azab H, Moursy M, Mohamed M, Elsayed M. A comparison of the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with large-size graft versus reconstruction with average-size graft combined with extra articular tenodesis. Injury. 2023;54(3):976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.01.033.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2022. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 05 Jan 2024.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.

Article  Google Scholar 

Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1997;33(1):159–74.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wright J. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations: an evaluation of literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238721645_Levels_of_Evidence_and_Grades_of_Recommendations_An_Evaluation_of_Literature#fullTextFileContent. Accessed 05 Jan 2024.

Wright J. A practical guide to assigning levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(5):1128–30. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200705000-00029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suomalainen P, Moisala A, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Jarvela T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: randomized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(8):1615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511405024.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N. Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509347096.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Annear P, Rohr E, Hille D, Gohil S, Ebert J. No clinical difference in 10-year outcomes between standard and minimal graft debridement techniques in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings: a randomized controlled trial. Euro Soc Sports Traumatol Knee Sur Arthrosc. 2019;27(2):516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5146-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barie A, Sprinckstub T, Huber J, Jaber A. Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(10):1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03508-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bottoni C, Smith E, Shaha J, Shaha S, Raybin S, Tokish J, Rowles D. Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515596406.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castoldi M, Magnussen R, Gunst S, Batailler C, Neyret P, Lustig S, Servien E. A randomized controlled trial of bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra-articular tenodesis: 19-year clinical and radiological follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(7):1665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520914936.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chahal J, Whelan D, Hoit G, Theodoropoulos J, Ajrawat P, Betsch M, Docter S, Dwyer T. Anterior cruciate ligament patellar tendon autograft fixation at 0° versus 30° results in improved activity scores and a greater proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinical important difference for knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome. Arthrosc. 2022;38(6):1969–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.018.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Wall M, Scholes C, Patel S, Coolican M, Parker D. Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study comparing metal interference screw and staples with a centrally placed polyethylene screw and sheath. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511406234.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi M, Yagi M, Matsumoto A, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Nishimoto K, Araki D, Kurosaka M. Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthrosc. 2011;27(7):906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.015.

Article  Google Scholar 

Funchal L, Astur D, Ortiz R, Cohen M. The presence of the arthroscopic “floating meniscus” sign as an indicator for surgical intervention in patients with combined anterior cruciate ligament and grade II Medial collateral ligament injury. Arthrosc. 2019;35(3):930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.114.

Article  Google Scholar 

Getgood A, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, McCormack R, Rezansoff A, Peterson D, Bardana D, MacDonald P, Verdonk P, Spalding T, STABILITY Study Group. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519896333.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harilainen A, Sandelin J. A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices- Rigidfix, bioscrew, and intrafix- Randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(4):699–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508328109.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoogeslag R, Huis In’t Veld R, Brouwer R, de Graaff F, Verdonschot N. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: repair or reconstruction? Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(7):1779. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221090527.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ibrahim S, Abdul Ghafar S, Marwan Y, Mahgoub A, Al Misfer A, Farouk H, Wagdy M, Alherran H, Khirait S. Intratunnel versus extratunnel autologous hamstring double-bundle graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 2 femoral fixation procedures. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):161–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514554189.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jarvela T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(5):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0254-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jarvela T, Moisala A, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: Prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):290–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507308360.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jarvela S, Kiekara T, Suomalainen P, Jarvela T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 10-year results. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(11):2578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517712231.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kautzner J, Kos P, Hanus M, Trc T, Havlas V. A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop. 2015;39(1):125–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2495-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koga H, Muneta T, Yagishita K, Watanabe T, Mochizuki T, Horie M, Nakamura T, Otabe K, Sekiya I. Effect of posterolateral bundle graft fixation angles on clinical outcomes in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5):1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514567069.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kosters C, Gl