Buy Article Permissions and Reprints Abstract

Objective For many health care providers, an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) may be a contraindication for skin-to-skin contact (SSC). Our aim was to compare the frequency of adverse events between preterm infants who were on SSC with UVC and those who remained in an incubator.

Study Design Prospective observational study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation. UVC-related adverse events were compared between neonates who performed SSC and those who did not. The incidence of catheter-related displacement, leak, loss, hemorrhage, malfunction, and bloodstream infection was studied.

Results From 226 patients, 171 performed SSC with UVC. Their first contact was earlier than in those who remained in an incubator (SSC-UVC, 29 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 21–53] vs. no SSC-UVC, 132 hours [IQR: 96–188]; p < 0.001). Both groups were similar in gestational age (SSC-UVC, 30 weeks vs. no SSC-UVC, 30.3 weeks; p = 0.331) and birth weight (SSC-UVC, 1,285 g vs. no SSC-UVC, 1,355 g; p = 0.2). Studied complications were not more frequent in patients who performed SSC. In fact, although it was not statistically significant, a lower overall incidence of adverse events (SSC-UVC, 13.5% vs. no SSC-UVC, 20%; p = 0.237) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (SSC-UVC, 4.7% vs. no SSC-UVC, 10.9%; p = 0.111) was observed in this group.

Conclusion SSC with a UVC is a safe procedure and there are no more complications in newborns who perform SSC compared to those who remain in the incubator. Due to its demonstrated benefits, SSC should be promoted in premature newborns regardless of the presence of a UVC.

Key Points

SSC in preterm infants with UVCs is safe.

Early SSC does not increase UVC-related bloodstream infection.

Early SSC should be promoted in stable patients regardless of the presence of a UVC.

Keywords prematurity - skin-to-skin contact - umbilical catheter - neonatal intensive care - NIDCAP Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are not openly available due to privacy and confidentiality reasons but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are located in a controlled access data storage in Vall d'Hebron University Hospital.

Publication History

Received: 11 April 2024

Accepted: 06 August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 August 2024

Article published online:
26 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA