Qin S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):199. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01056-1

Moradali MF, Ghods S, and Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: A paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:39. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039.

Pachori P, Gothalwal R, and Gandhi P. Emergence of antibiotic resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit. Genes and Dis. 2019;2(6):109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.04.001.

Khan J, Tarar SM, Gul I, Nawaz U, and Arshad M. Challenges of antibiotic resistance biofilms and potential combating strategies: a review. Biotech. 2021;11(4):428-39. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02707-w.

Ghssein G and Ezzeddine Z. A Review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Metallophores: Pyoverdine, Pyochelin and Pseudopaline. Biol. 2022;18(12):12.339-44. doi: 10.3390/biology11121711.

Sultan M, RArya R, and Kim K. Roles of two-component systems in pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4): 475-487. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212152.

Abo-Ksour MF. Presence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases Genes in E. coli Isolated from Farm Workers in the South of London. Int J Pharm Qua Assur. 2018; 9(1); 64-67.

Grace A, Sahu R, Owen DR, and Dennis VA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference strains PAO1 and PA14: A genomic, phenotypic, and therapeutic review. Fron Micro. 2022; 13(33):75-82. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1023523.

Poulsen BE . Defining the core essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019:20(116): 35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900570116.

Iraida E, Robledo 1, Edna EA, Guillermo JV. Detection of the KPC gene in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii during a PCR-based nosocomial surveillance study in Puerto Rico. Antimic Age Chemo. 2011.55: (6)2968–2970. doi:10.1128/AAC.01633-10

Mohammed F, AboKsour. Virulence genes detection in Brucella isolated from animals farms in west of Iraq. 2021. Biochemical and Cellular Archives 18(1):59-64. 0972-5075.

Hoceini A. Evaluation of Biofilm Forming Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa Isolated from Peripheral Venous Catheters and Urinary Catheters In Algeria, in vitro Study. Advanced Research in Life Sciences. 2023;7(1):83–92. doi: 10.2478/arls-2023-0010.

Fahim MK, AboKsour MF, Hadi S. Bioremediation by bacteria isolated from water contaminated with hydrocarbons. Revis Bionatura 2023;8 (3) 94 doi: 10.21931/RB/2023.08.03.94.

Da JL, Costa Lima, Alves LR, Da Paz JN, Rabelo MA, Maciel MV, and De Morais M. Analysis of biofilm production by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with ventilator-Associated pneumonia. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;3(29):310–316. doi:10.5935/0103-507X.20170039.

Hassuna NA, Darwish MA, Sayed M, and Ibrahem RA. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of high-level resistance to meropenem and imipenem in pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;(1):285–293. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S233808.

LaBauve AE and Wargo MJ. Growth and laboratory maintenance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc06e01s25.

Langendonk RF, Neill DR, and Fothergill JF. The Building Blocks of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Implications for Current Resistance-Breaking Therapies. Fron Cellu Inf Micro. 2021;7(11)698-14. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.665759.

Ahmed MR, Mohammed FA, Mohammed FA, Srwa HM. Evaluation of Anti-Biofilm Formation Effect of Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles (NiO-NPs) Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Int. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.2021; 4(17): 221-230.

Chimi LY, Noubom M, Bisso BN, Singor Njateng GS, Dzoyem JP. Biofilm Formation, Pyocyanin Production, and Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Wounds. Int J Microbiol. 2024;1207536. doi: 10.1155/2024/1207536.

Abdulhaq N, Nawaz Z, Zahoor MA, Siddique AB. Association of biofilm formation with multi drug resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EXCLI J. 2020;19:201-208. doi: 10.17179/excli2019-2049.

Sultan M and Nabiel Y. Tube method and Congo red agar versus tissue culture plate method for detection of biofilm production by uropathogens isolated from midstream urine: Which one could be better. African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology2018;1(20):760-771.

Gurunathan S, Thangaraj P, Das J, Kim JH. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa derived outer membrane vesicles against Streptococcus mutans. Heliyon. 2023;9(12):e22606. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22606.

Almeida AC, de Sá Cavalcanti FL, Vilela MA, Gales AC, de Morais MA Jr, Camargo de Morais MM. Escherichia coli ST502 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 sharing an IncW plasmid harbouring the bla(KPC-2) gene in an Intensive Care Unit patient. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40(4):374-376. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.05.022.

Rajabi H, Salimizand H, Khodabandehloo M, Fayyazi A, Ramazanzadeh R. Prevalence of algD, pslD, pelF, Ppgl, and PAPI-1 Genes Involved in Biofilm Formation in Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains. Biomed Res Int. 2022;716087. doi:10.1155/2022/1716087.

Wang X, Liu M, Yu C, Li J, and Zhou X. Biofilm formation: mechanistic insights and therapeutic targets,” Molecular Biomedicine. 2023;4(1): 457-461.doi: 10.1186/s43556-023-00164-w.

D'Arpa P, Karna SLR, Chen T, Leung KP. Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome adaptations from colonization to biofilm infection of skin wounds. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20632. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00073-4

Rheima, A. M., Al Marjani, M. F., Aboksour, M. F., Mohammed, S. H. Evaluation of Anti-Biofilm Formation Effect of Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles (NiO-NPs) Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Intl J Nano Nanotech. 2021;17(4): 221-230.

Cherny KE, Sauer K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Requires the DNA-Specific Endonuclease EndA To Degrade Extracellular Genomic DNA To Disperse from the Biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2019;22;201(18):59-69. doi:10.1128/JB.00059-19.